YachtMaster dilemma. Need help :)

[jrocks]

Ok, I decided I want a new YM on oysterflex. I can buy the RG 40mm, or the WG 42 for the same price. Like the RG a touch more, but the WG looks better on my wrist (Flat and almost 8") Both from a local AD.

Trading in my TT Sub (116613LN) and getting what I paid for it, so that seems like a fair price.

Typically, I go with "Buy the one you like best", but it's a real tossup!

[N&M]

How will you use it? RG not for business meetings etc

[dottore]

Buy the WG 42 since it looks better on your wrist.

[RJRJRJ]

Size vs aesthetics. Since you like the RG more, I would go with that as long is it doesn't look comically small on you. I own the RG fwiw, but my wrists are also a lot smaller than yours.

[phillyEagles]

Rolex RG is a little too pink to my eye.

[Master_Grogu]

126655 (RG) is much better IMO. There is a very cool, almost sinister look with the WG, however I feel it is nothing special. Honestly go with the WG if it looks better on you wrist.

[BigAppleBill]

For me, the Everose YM40 on oysterflex was love at first sight. Just the right combination of luxury and stealthiness. Then I tried it on (years ago) and, to my eye and on my wrist, the oysterflex bracelet seemed too big/cumbersome compared to the watch. So I ended up having to admire it on other people’s wrists.

When the WG YM42 was released in 2019, I didn’t even bother to try it on because I was already biased against the oysterflex bracelet and the size increase seemed nonsensical.

Fast forward to a few months ago and I happened to be checking out some watches on 47th St. I spotted a WG YM42 and on a whim I asked to try it on. I couldn’t believe how great it looked and felt on my wrist! So after a few weeks of mulling it over I went to my AD and asked them to contact me when the next YM42 came in. A couple of weeks later I got the call. All I can say is that I think it’s an amazing piece.

While I initially preferred the matte dial of the Everose YM40, the lacquered dial of the YM42 is equally impressive. I also like the pure black and white theme of the YM42 and I find the slightly larger hour indices to be very legible and the cyclops date lens is less dominant and more integral to the layout of the dial. Most importantly, I prefer the extra stealthiness of the WG, which makes it more wearable (for me) for a wider variety of occasions. What’s also cool is that at 11.8mm thick, it’s much more balanced on the wrist than the 12.2mm thick Daytona on an oysterflex.

Lastly, I now think I understand why Rolex increased the size of the Submariner to 41mm. I believe Rolex will eventually offer the Sub on an oysterflex bracelet. And the oysterflex bracelet is aesthetically a better match with a slightly larger watch. For those who have not tried on the YM42 for whatever reason, I urge you to give it a try.

[Pinchy]

I really love the dial on the RG. Matte black with RED YachtMaster. It channels old submariner feels. Super class, super stealth. In an office setting though... gold is gold so... a lady can pull it off, I really don't know if it's cool for a guy.

[szabo_martin]

Wearing my 42 today and love everything about it. Im 6'4" so the 42 fits me. RG is nice too, but I also prefer the stealth of the WG and white writing on lacquer

[Jackie Daytona]

Personally I think the rose gold is more fitting for that model. The white gold is still great I just feel like the rose gold is the best variation of it.

[101031-28]

Personally I'm more of a visual vs practical, so I would go with the RG

[2001jesper]

Originally Posted by BigAppleBill

For me, the Everose YM40 on oysterflex was love at first sight. Just the right combination of luxury and stealthiness. Then I tried it on (years ago) and, to my eye and on my wrist, the oysterflex bracelet seemed too big/cumbersome compared to the watch. So I ended up having to admire it on other people’s wrists.

When the WG YM42 was released in 2019, I didn’t even bother to try it on because I was already biased against the oysterflex bracelet and the size increase seemed nonsensical.

Fast forward to a few months ago and I happened to be checking out some watches on 47th St. I spotted a WG YM42 and on a whim I asked to try it on. I couldn’t believe how great it looked and felt on my wrist! So after a few weeks of mulling it over I went to my AD and asked them to contact me when the next YM42 came in. A couple of weeks later I got the call. All I can say is that I think it’s an amazing piece.

While I initially preferred the matte dial of the Everose YM40, the lacquered dial of the YM42 is equally impressive. I also like the pure black and white theme of the YM42 and I find the slightly larger hour indices to be very legible and the cyclops date lens is less dominant and more integral to the layout of the dial. Most importantly, I prefer the extra stealthiness of the WG, which makes it more wearable (for me) for a wider variety of occasions. What’s also cool is that at 11.8mm thick, it’s much more balanced on the wrist than the 12.2mm thick Daytona on an oysterflex.

Lastly, I now think I understand why Rolex increased the size of the Submariner to 41mm. I believe Rolex will eventually offer the Sub on an oysterflex bracelet. And the oysterflex bracelet is aesthetically a better match with a slightly larger watch. For those who have not tried on the YM42 for whatever reason, I urge you to give it a try.

Wow. Looks stunning! Must be a pleasure to wear that every day

[JSol1]

I think either is stunning. I personally own the RG and normally avoid PM pieces, but with OF, which I love I feel the RG is also understated...as soon as I tried one on I couldn’t get it out of my mind, so I ended up buying it. I actually wear it when I want to be under the radar...good luck as I don’t believe there is a wrong choice!

[jrocks]

Hard to beat that. Thanks for the insight

[triple.lindy]

Tried both on at a grey dealer not too long ago. Wanted to like the RG but just not for me. The 42 was incredible! I loved the size, how it wears, pretty much everything about it! I'm wearing my SD43 on a rubberB now to try to convince myself that I don't need the YM42... It hasn't worked yet....

[jrocks]

Thanks everyone. Sleeping on it tonight. Will post a pick when I decide ;)

[Kiddodoc]

Of those two, I would go 42 YM. It is a great looking watch.

[BigAppleBill]

Originally Posted by 2001jesper

Wow. Looks stunning! Must be a pleasure to wear that every day

Thanks! I don't use it as a daily, though it's very comfortable and could be easily worn daily. I got it mostly for a summer fun watch for short sleeved evenings out and resort wear. I personally think of it as a great Miami watch. All I need now is the Yacht.

[LC23]

Originally Posted by jrocks

Ok, I decided I want a new YM on oysterflex. I can buy the RG 40mm, or the WG 42 for the same price. Like the RG a touch more, but the WG looks better on my wrist (Flat and almost 8") Both from a local AD.

Trading in my TT Sub (116613LN) and getting what I paid for it, so that seems like a fair price.

Typically, I go with "Buy the one you like best", but it's a real tossup!

Depends your collection... I'd go white if you don't have one than get a rose after!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[desmomini]

Originally Posted by N&M

How will you use it? RG not for business meetings etc

Huh? Says who?

[Mystro]

Originally Posted by dottore

Buy the WG 42 since it looks better on your wrist.

X2. The organic case design of the YM wears smaller so a 42mm will feel like a 41mm on the wrist.

[NachoNeal]

Originally Posted by N&M

How will you use it? RG not for business meetings etc

. lol

[jerryguo]

42 mm is the way to go


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SS Oyster]

Get 42mm WG for 8” wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[EEpro]

WG42 or the sky dweller

[Sub*Man]

I had the RG, and loved it until I didn’t. I lost money when I sold it. You might regret trading your Sub towards it.

[Doood]

YM42. I really like this watch. Probably my favorite PM Rolex ATM. Similar wrist size as the OP.

[Becweb]

Rose gold on Oysterflex looks much better visually IMO

[greg19]

Of course we all know fit is everything, then looks. If it looks too small it's going to drive you crazy. I opted for the RG when faced with making a choice. BTW my wrist is 7 1/4. Good luck on your decision