ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

presario · 7 May 2009, 04:16 AM

No, they will not. The Tudor line might though.

StarSovereign · 7 May 2009, 01:18 PM

40mm is the perfect size, anything too much bigger is tacky and gauche, IMHO. Brietlings are teetering on this fence...

onkyo · 7 May 2009, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

42 mm at the most.....but no more than that!!

Agree with JJ on this.... 41-42 mm max for a sports watch. 45 mm is huge.

I would love to see it.

SLS · 7 May 2009, 01:27 PM

40mm is perfect for me, so if they do I'll stick with my current collection.

Wildwing · 7 May 2009, 01:58 PM

I see no need to want beyond my 36mm Datejust and 40mm Sea Dweller. They have excellent proportions for what they do.

7 May 2009, 04:16 AM	#31
presario "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Andrew Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,428	No, they will not. The Tudor line might though. __________________

7 May 2009, 01:27 PM	#34
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	40mm is perfect for me, so if they do I'll stick with my current collection. __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

7 May 2009, 01:18 PM	#32
StarSovereign "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Erik Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: 116234, 116710LN Posts: 936	40mm is the perfect size, anything too much bigger is tacky and gauche, IMHO. Brietlings are teetering on this fence...

7 May 2009, 01:58 PM	#35
Wildwing "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Virginia, USA Posts: 593	I see no need to want beyond my 36mm Datejust and 40mm Sea Dweller. They have excellent proportions for what they do.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)