ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21 May 2021, 10:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Denmark
Posts: 139
|
Is the bracelet of the new 2020 OP36 and the new explorer 36 the same in size?
As headline says, do anyone know the exact measurements if the bracelet, size of links, etc? I just want to confirm whether it's identical, except the clasp of course.
|
22 May 2021, 12:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Turkey
Posts: 56
|
Why don’t you measure them yourself? And maybe take some side by side photos too. I would love to see that.
|
22 May 2021, 12:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: fl
Watch: 124060 126000
Posts: 43
|
Believe I heard that the 2020 OP 36mm is 20mm and the 2021 EXP is 19mm. I have the OP36. I love it - but it runs 8 seconds slow daily. My new 2021 Sub only runs 2 seconds slow daily. Eventually will send back for recalib. Would have preferred the 31xx movement in hindsight.
|
22 May 2021, 01:08 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
From what I understand (and this post should be your resource: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=803695 ) it goes like this:
Exp36 lug width: 19mm bracelet tapers to: 14mm clasp width: 16mm OP36 lug width: 20mm bracelet tapers to: 16mm clasp width: 16mm (not sure if this is right?)
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
22 May 2021, 01:17 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Denmark
Posts: 139
|
Quote:
|
|
22 May 2021, 01:32 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
This has been well-established...the new EXP is only 19mm lug width, whereas most other 36mm Rolex use a 20mm lug width.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
22 May 2021, 01:37 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
Can you post a picture of the two clasps side-by-side?
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
22 May 2021, 01:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Denmark
Posts: 139
|
Here you go. It is noticably smaller. Personally I like it
|
22 May 2021, 01:53 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Denmark
Posts: 139
|
Quote:
|
|
22 May 2021, 02:04 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
Hmm then I must have the OP36 clasp measurement on my earlier post wrong. Is it 17mm? 18mm?
I'm certain on the OP36 lug width and taper, just not sure how much larger the clasp is compared to the removable links.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
22 May 2021, 02:09 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Denmark
Posts: 139
|
No idea honestly. If I had a plastic calipher I'd use it. But op clasp is bigger.
|
22 May 2021, 03:01 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Turkey
Posts: 56
|
Thank you for great comparison pics of two current 36mm models.
As far as I’m concerned, these are the correct measurements: OP36 Bracelet: 20mm to 15.5mm Clasp: 17.5mm Exp36 Bracelet: 19mm to 14mm Clasp: 16.2mm |
18 July 2021, 02:05 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
|
Great information!
|
18 July 2021, 02:21 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Space
Posts: 64
|
Wow….
I like the older explorer |
18 July 2021, 03:13 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
Oh no really? :( Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
18 July 2021, 07:45 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: HKG
Posts: 41
|
Hi! They're not identical. The explorer's bracelet tapers significantly.
|
19 July 2021, 01:16 AM | #17 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
A piece of paper and a pencil is all you need to show actual relationships.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
20 July 2021, 11:44 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: canada
Posts: 457
|
I'd love to see a side on comparison of the bezels if you had one! Should show the domed of the OP vs angular of the Exp. Thanks
|
21 July 2021, 07:04 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The UK
Watch: I love them all.
Posts: 1,860
|
Quote:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=786299
__________________
Regards, CharlesN Member of the IWJG. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.