ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 July 2021, 11:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
|
A “new” 1675
This post is likely to cause some on here to have their hair curl. I’ll start off with a small preface.
I don’t like modern Rolex - the Daytona excluded. I’ve tried. They appeal visually to me, but not on the wrist. My sweet spot are the 5 digit reference. That said, I have always wanted a 4 digit reference. My concern however is always the same - condition. The prices of an all original 1675 for example can be north of 20k for rusted hands, flaking tritium and missing bracelets. Perfect condition all originals are north of 25k and there’s still no guarantees with these prices in term of “under the hood”. I just can’t justify purchasing a 50 year old watch for these prices and not be able to wear it without worry. Two weeks ago a 1675 2.8mm serial (‘71-‘72) came across WatchRecon that was RSC factory serviced (w/ papers) with genuine replacement bezel, dial, hands, crown, tubes, gaskets, crystal and bracelet. To me, it was a brand new 1675 as if Rolex produced them today. The watch may not have anything other than the case and movement original (I believe the date wheel is also the original brushed silver open 6/9 flat 3), but it maintains all the design esthetics of the 1675 and in a fully working, serviced package: - Matte dial with large lume plots - WG no surrounds - Open 6/9, flat 3 date wheel - Raised crystal - Wide bezel I jumped. It was exactly what I was looking for. The watch came a few days ago and as far as I can tell, the watch was never used post service. The bracelet hinges are stiff, loctite glue was still in all the screws, not a mark on the case or bracelet and it runs within superlative spec. I’m very happy. To me the beauty of this 50 year old watch is that 50 years later, it works as it originally did when first purchased. Since RSC serviced, I don’t have to worry about non-genuine parts or needing to service anytime soon. Also price wise, it’s at the bottom of the 1675 price spectrum for arguably the most everyday wearable on that 1675 spectrum. The vintage guys here I know are going to scoff at this. It’s fine, I totally get that side too. All collectors are different. But this 50 year old beauty I expect to last another 50 without issue. Cheers! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by Tools; 1 August 2021 at 03:04 AM.. Reason: Title Correction |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.