ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

iTreelex · 1 September 2020, 10:20 AM

Yuck

steve099 · 1 September 2020, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey

jeeez that colours even more cartoony than the blnr!

its the same blue as the 116619LB, its just brighter under certain lighting.

samson66 · 1 September 2020, 10:26 AM

That just doesn't look like a $40K watch. For that kind of money ill get a DayDate

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk

speedbird · 1 September 2020, 10:27 AM

Cannot be a real picture, surely...

NewbieRollie · 1 September 2020, 10:27 AM

Looked better In other pics and sucks it’s white gold. Really thought it was stainless smh fail

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

justdate · 1 September 2020, 10:31 AM

Another angle

https://www.instagram.com/p/CEksxMYA...=1n9yhuw5txysq

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Plebs · 1 September 2020, 10:42 AM

Need to see it in natural lighting, here looks way to bright. Photos looked better on site, darker blue would have worked better imo.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tonysoprano100 · 1 September 2020, 10:45 AM

The blue of the website is much more beautiful.

Darker blue.

Check the website....thats the truth

Roger Lococco · 1 September 2020, 10:49 AM

Looks pretty bad

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Springfield · 1 September 2020, 10:51 AM

Yikes.

Fallranger · 1 September 2020, 10:52 AM

If that’s real it’s terrible.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jjfesq · 1 September 2020, 10:54 AM

Fugazy.
Nice try

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jchthe3rd · 1 September 2020, 10:56 AM

Should have used that same new blue dial for all sub variants, that would look way better on the WG instead of the sharky look

StackLexus17 · 24 August 2021, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjfesq

Fugazy.
Nice try

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This aged well

Handey0465 · 24 August 2021, 09:32 AM

Everyone claiming they dislike it. We need to see their post history since this thread was started a year ago. I guarantee some of them flip flopped on their opinions.

1 September 2020, 10:49 AM	#39
Roger Lococco "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Real Name: Roger Lococco Location: Asia Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi Posts: 2,980	Looks pretty bad Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 116500 Daytona White Dial 126710BLNR GMT II 126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II

1 September 2020, 10:52 AM	#41
Fallranger "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Real Name: Nate Location: Ohio Watch: Hulk (116610LV) Posts: 296	If that’s real it’s terrible. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex Submariner \| Zenith El Primero \| Tag Aquaracer \| Zodiac Grandrally

1 September 2020, 10:20 AM	#31
iTreelex "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Watchrecon Posts: 1,352	Yuck

1 September 2020, 10:26 AM	#33
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,793	That just doesn't look like a $40K watch. For that kind of money ill get a DayDate Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk

1 September 2020, 10:27 AM	#34
speedbird "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: N/A Posts: 164	Cannot be a real picture, surely...

1 September 2020, 10:27 AM	#35
NewbieRollie "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Gary Location: PA Posts: 41	Looked better In other pics and sucks it’s white gold. Really thought it was stainless smh fail Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 September 2020, 10:31 AM	#36
justdate "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: RJ Location: UK Coast Watch: PP/AP/Rolex Posts: 1,359	Another angle https://www.instagram.com/p/CEksxMYA...=1n9yhuw5txysq Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 September 2020, 10:42 AM	#37
Plebs "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2020 Real Name: Bobby Location: Antarctica Posts: 376	Need to see it in natural lighting, here looks way to bright. Photos looked better on site, darker blue would have worked better imo. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 September 2020, 10:45 AM	#38
tonysoprano100 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: chile Posts: 109	The blue of the website is much more beautiful. Darker blue. Check the website....thats the truth

1 September 2020, 10:51 AM	#40
Springfield "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Springfield, IL Posts: 120	Yikes.

1 September 2020, 10:54 AM	#42
jjfesq "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: NY Watch: 116618 LB smurf Posts: 154	Fugazy. Nice try Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 September 2020, 10:56 AM	#43
jchthe3rd "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: - Location: US of A Watch: Sub, GMT, DD Posts: 84	Should have used that same new blue dial for all sub variants, that would look way better on the WG instead of the sharky look

24 August 2021, 09:32 AM	#45
Handey0465 Banned Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Mark Location: South Carolina Watch: 126711CHNR Posts: 511	Everyone claiming they dislike it. We need to see their post history since this thread was started a year ago. I guarantee some of them flip flopped on their opinions.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)