ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 May 2009, 01:21 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: NC
Posts: 61
|
Real or fake?
I think this one is good but I am not 100%.
|
6 May 2009, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: NC
Posts: 61
|
One more pic
|
6 May 2009, 01:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
|
Looks OK, but I'm sure one of the real experts will chime in soon.
__________________
"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V" |
6 May 2009, 01:35 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
...be careful...
...of what I can SEE in the pic's, the band is NON-descending in thickness...which would be suspect FAKE.
...but like I say, based on the pic's. Stan. |
6 May 2009, 06:26 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
*bump* to the top
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
6 May 2009, 08:41 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
Do you have access to other information, reference numbers, pics from other angles?
|
6 May 2009, 09:26 PM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
The crown and crown lugs, along with the dial font appear genuine based on my observations when the photos are magnified significantly.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
6 May 2009, 10:31 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: NC
Posts: 61
|
These are the only other pics I have. It is a D serial.
|
7 May 2009, 12:20 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
I think the watch looks good but that is my opinion. You should try to get reference numbers and other pictures to get a good definite decision.
|
8 May 2009, 05:23 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
IMO those marker surrounds look too thick and the 'o' diver release mark too pronounced. I would want to hold this one prior to purchase.
__________________
E |
16 May 2009, 03:33 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 17
|
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...%3DI%26otn%3D2
The seller doesn't know so i figured I would ask some people that are knowledgeable. Im sure its hard to tell by looking but hopefully someone can let me know. thanks! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.