ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 January 2022, 06:48 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,673
|
No Glidelock.
Was the 116610LV ever available without Glidelock? |
21 January 2022, 06:54 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 351
|
No expert here, but my initial thought is that it's probably legit. Can't say I'm all that confident since the super clones are so close to the real thing.
Can you post a closeups of the dial? |
21 January 2022, 06:57 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
|
21 January 2022, 07:05 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 44
|
|
21 January 2022, 07:06 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NWA, USA
Watch: BLRO/Daytona/OP41s
Posts: 5,387
|
Hulk always had Glidelock. If this one doesn’t then it’s 99% no bueno.
|
21 January 2022, 07:06 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: NYC
Watch: 321, Pepsi, Bond60
Posts: 112
|
As the photos were taken with a potato its hard to tell. That said, all evidence points to it being fake or at least extremely suspect.
No one with a super desirable Rolex is going to be willing to negotiate that much of a price difference unless 1) they are desperate 2) its stolen(would explain the lack of box and papers) 3) Its fake(most likely) 4)they dont know the market on these. I find it hard to believe that 4, considering its fairly easy to get a quote for this, they do know its worth more than they paid, so they arent stupid. I find the desperate even harder to believe because in reality, if they were desperate to sell it quick to raise money, they would sell it at any number of known sellers(DavidSW and such). They would at least get most of their asking price, if legit. It also just looks off in the potato photos. I would run far away |
21 January 2022, 07:34 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Looks fake to me. The seller may not know it’s fake, but I wouldn’t buy it.
|
21 January 2022, 08:12 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Harold Brown
Location: Nebraska
Watch: DSSD 126660,116506
Posts: 74
|
Imagine how your mood would sink when you sent it to a Rolex Service Center and they
returned it refusing to work on it. Shop around with Trusted Sellers and pay a little more. The additional cost divided by the years of peace of mind knowing it’s legit will be worth it. You can save some money with a Trusted Seller getting one without box and papers if you’re OK with that. Smart asking folks here, they know a lot more than me too. |
21 January 2022, 08:35 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Real Name: Greg
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 287
|
I agree with many of the comments calling it a questionable watch. Additional observations: (a) the “X” of the “ROLEX” in the rehaut should exactly line up with the 25 minute mark; (b) the serial number in the rehaut should exactly start at the 26.5 minute mark and end exactly at the 33.5 minute mark and be centered; (c) the depth of the numbers and hash marks in the bezel insert appear to be deeper; and (d) I’m curious of the lume - is it bright, lasts long, is uniform, and in Chromalight?
__________________
Rolexes, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Breguet, Blancpain, Omegas, Breitling, Zenith, Cartier, Heuers, Longines, Bell & Ross, Laco, Doxa, Zodiac, Glycine, Movado, Seikos, Casios, Victorinox, and Tugaris. |
21 January 2022, 10:26 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Watch: Sometimes
Posts: 1,197
|
It depth of the print in the clasp is too deep, too sharp. Definitely not a genuine clasp.
|
23 January 2022, 05:43 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Sweden
Posts: 16
|
Doesnt look like mine. I'd stay away
|
23 January 2022, 10:08 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 947
|
As others have mentioned "T1G" is a well known super clone code. If you Google "T1G Rolex" you'll see.
|
23 January 2022, 10:40 AM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Yes, my guess is he’s pretty negotiable on price Because the watch appears to be fake, which would be corroborated by his ridiculous statement that the box and papers were lost in the flood. Mine were eaten by locusts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 January 2022, 12:03 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SUB LV-C/Pepsi C
Posts: 423
|
100% fake. The bracelet code and the cyclops are the biggest tells. Bezel sucks too.
Rehaut alignment doesn’t matter fwiw. I have a 2012 Yatchmaster that is off by about 1mm and cannot be fixed without risk of breaking the posts on the dial. |
1 February 2022, 01:09 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: bulgaria
Posts: 3
|
fake for me !
|
1 February 2022, 01:26 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,223
|
Looks fake, no glide lock
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021 |
3 February 2022, 03:36 PM | #47 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
I’ll agree you’re no expert since it’s clearly a fake. Look how terrible the bezel Font is and how bad the cyclops is, there’s no AR on it. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.