The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 January 2022, 06:48 AM   #31
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,673
No Glidelock.

Was the 116610LV ever available without Glidelock?
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 06:54 AM   #32
Shazbot302
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 351
No expert here, but my initial thought is that it's probably legit. Can't say I'm all that confident since the super clones are so close to the real thing.



Can you post a closeups of the dial?
Shazbot302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 06:57 AM   #33
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry-57 View Post
No Glidelock.

Was the 116610LV ever available without Glidelock?
One of my very first thoughts, too! However I can't tell if it is in fact hidden underneath the clasp blade, which provides just enough coverage to conceal it.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 07:05 AM   #34
xriddle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantD View Post
T1G clasp code is well known fake code.
Great catch! For that reason i'm out.

Glad i came to the right place. You guys all rock.

Thanks so much
xriddle
xriddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 07:06 AM   #35
ArtNouveau
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NWA, USA
Watch: BLRO/Daytona/OP41s
Posts: 5,387
Hulk always had Glidelock. If this one doesn’t then it’s 99% no bueno.
ArtNouveau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 07:06 AM   #36
neekon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: NYC
Watch: 321, Pepsi, Bond60
Posts: 112
As the photos were taken with a potato its hard to tell. That said, all evidence points to it being fake or at least extremely suspect.

No one with a super desirable Rolex is going to be willing to negotiate that much of a price difference unless 1) they are desperate 2) its stolen(would explain the lack of box and papers) 3) Its fake(most likely) 4)they dont know the market on these.

I find it hard to believe that 4, considering its fairly easy to get a quote for this, they do know its worth more than they paid, so they arent stupid.
I find the desperate even harder to believe because in reality, if they were desperate to sell it quick to raise money, they would sell it at any number of known sellers(DavidSW and such). They would at least get most of their asking price, if legit.

It also just looks off in the potato photos. I would run far away
neekon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 07:34 AM   #37
RazorD
"TRF" Member
 
RazorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
Looks fake to me. The seller may not know it’s fake, but I wouldn’t buy it.
RazorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 08:12 AM   #38
Brucehbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Harold Brown
Location: Nebraska
Watch: DSSD 126660,116506
Posts: 74
Imagine how your mood would sink when you sent it to a Rolex Service Center and they
returned it refusing to work on it. Shop around with Trusted Sellers and pay a little more.
The additional cost divided by the years of peace of mind knowing it’s legit will be worth it.
You can save some money with a Trusted Seller getting one without box and papers if you’re
OK with that. Smart asking folks here, they know a lot more than me too.
Brucehbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 08:35 AM   #39
yorkzilla
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Real Name: Greg
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 287
I agree with many of the comments calling it a questionable watch. Additional observations: (a) the “X” of the “ROLEX” in the rehaut should exactly line up with the 25 minute mark; (b) the serial number in the rehaut should exactly start at the 26.5 minute mark and end exactly at the 33.5 minute mark and be centered; (c) the depth of the numbers and hash marks in the bezel insert appear to be deeper; and (d) I’m curious of the lume - is it bright, lasts long, is uniform, and in Chromalight?
__________________
Rolexes, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Breguet, Blancpain, Omegas, Breitling, Zenith, Cartier, Heuers, Longines, Bell & Ross, Laco, Doxa, Zodiac, Glycine, Movado, Seikos, Casios, Victorinox, and Tugaris.
yorkzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 10:26 AM   #40
siempreko
"TRF" Member
 
siempreko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Watch: Sometimes
Posts: 1,197
It depth of the print in the clasp is too deep, too sharp. Definitely not a genuine clasp.
siempreko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2022, 05:43 AM   #41
Helseth
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Sweden
Posts: 16
Doesnt look like mine. I'd stay away
Helseth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2022, 10:08 AM   #42
Laostuh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 947
As others have mentioned "T1G" is a well known super clone code. If you Google "T1G Rolex" you'll see.
Laostuh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2022, 10:40 AM   #43
GGGMT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by xriddle View Post
It's not super cheap he's asking 25k i got him down under 20k

Yes, my guess is he’s pretty negotiable on price Because the watch appears to be fake, which would be corroborated by his ridiculous statement that the box and papers were lost in the flood. Mine were eaten by locusts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2022, 12:03 AM   #44
SwissmadeTexan
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SUB LV-C/Pepsi C
Posts: 423
100% fake. The bracelet code and the cyclops are the biggest tells. Bezel sucks too.

Rehaut alignment doesn’t matter fwiw. I have a 2012 Yatchmaster that is off by about 1mm and cannot be fixed without risk of breaking the posts on the dial.
SwissmadeTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2022, 01:09 AM   #45
jasaam
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: bulgaria
Posts: 3
fake for me !
jasaam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2022, 01:26 AM   #46
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,223
Looks fake, no glide lock
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2022, 03:36 PM   #47
cht
2024 Pledge Member
 
cht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazbot302 View Post
No expert here, but my initial thought is that it's probably legit. Can't say I'm all that confident since the super clones are so close to the real thing.



Can you post a closeups of the dial?

I’ll agree you’re no expert since it’s clearly a fake. Look how terrible the bezel Font is and how bad the cyclops is, there’s no AR on it.
cht is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.