116600 vs 16600? Worth considering?

[Fritzli]

Originally Posted by fishingbear

Didn’t wear that 16600 for years. Bought NOS from AD after it was discontinued. Some references have sentimental and useful values to me, some didn’t. The 16600 was part of an always evolving collection that I’ve enjoyed the hobby almost always through my AD. The ones that didn’t, like the 16600, generally get moved along.

Oh, and here below is my “low budget roller” collection accumulated over the last 25 years…..

Very sorry fishingbear, wrong assumptions and expressions from my side! Amazing collection, enjoy and wear in good health!

[Linuxpenguins]

The 116600 is remarkable. It's also becoming difficult to obtain here in the U.K.

It's a iykyk kind of watch.

[fishingbear]

Originally Posted by Fritzli

Very sorry fishingbear, wrong assumptions and expressions from my side! Amazing collection, enjoy and wear in good health!

[fishingbear]

Originally Posted by Linuxpenguins

It's a iykyk kind of watch.

Totally agree and makes me love this reference more.

[rockmastermike]

I’ve owned both and the 5 digit was the ultimate and best until I tried the 5 digit which is ultimater and bestest

[sherrill]

I have the current Omega Speedmaster 321 Ed White and the current 3861 Speedmaster. Thinking about trading the Ed White 321 for a Rolex 116600. Is this an even trade or bad idea?

[Fritzli]

Originally Posted by fishingbear

[Ferdelious]

116600 for the win.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Miker86]

Originally Posted by sherrill

I have the current Omega Speedmaster 321 Ed White and the current 3861 Speedmaster. Thinking about trading the Ed White 321 for a Rolex 116600. Is this an even trade or bad idea?

Surely a bad trade? The Ed White is a more special and more expensive watch?

[c3pastor]

I put my 16600 on and Everest Rubber Strap and kept the 116600 on glide-lock… 2 different looks, 2 different feels… both are amazing!

[Schmed]

I traded up from a 16600 to 116600.

I almost bought back my 16600, as I missed it. I would like to have both:

16600: smaller/lighter/really comfortable on the wrist. Works great on a NATO (lug holes on mine).

116600: love the larger indices, glide lock, heavier clasp, better lume. It helps that it's about +1 after two days, too.

Like c3pastor, I'd keep the 16600 on a strap and 116600 on a bracelet if I had both.

[tarmatimes]

116600 my choice

[sah]

Originally Posted by Schmed

I traded up from a 16600 to 116600.

I almost bought back my 16600, as I missed it. I would like to have both:

16600: smaller/lighter/really comfortable on the wrist. Works great on a NATO (lug holes on mine).

116600: love the larger indices, glide lock, heavier clasp, better lume. It helps that it's about +1 after two days, too.

Like c3pastor, I'd keep the 16600 on a strap and 116600 on a bracelet if I had both.

Ditto the strap for my 16600

[Schmed]

Originally Posted by c3pastor

I put my 16600 on and Everest Rubber Strap and kept the 116600 on glide-lock… 2 different looks, 2 different feels… both are amazing!

Interesting that the 16600 looks bigger than the 116600 in that pic.

[Roy Rolls]

16600 for 46 years. Love it today as much as when I bought it new from an AD.

[fskywalker]

Originally Posted by Fritzli

i dont understand this guys-selling a watch they worn for years? Are you low budget rollers or what is the reason to do so?!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[scottb23]

SD4K is my forever watch. As others have said the ceramic bezel, clasp, 40mm case w slightly slimmer lugs and date with no Cyclops just work so well. Add in a limited run as well before the jump to 43mm. It’s the daily driver and been through thick and thin. I also like new sea dwellers but this is the final modern “classic” and as a result a very important (and underrated) reference in the line up imho.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Redsub71]

16600 the original, ceramic a copy

[Meyrin]

Originally Posted by TheEscapist

...and am happy with it in every single aspect, the size, dial and hands balance, lack of cyclops… except for just one thing: the lack of lume.

I know exactly what you mean! I have an old 14060 Submariner, my daily watch, and while I treasure it and will never sell it the dead-as-a-dodo tritium lume does sometimes bug me, like last night when I was out and about in the dark. But this one little niggle wouldn't drive me to look for a new Submariner, excellent and much-improved though the new model undoubtedly is!

[Daytona88]

116600 is a stud of a watch. It still represents a decent value IMHO, relative to the more widely produced date and no date subs. Limited to 3 years of production may make it a true collectible in the future - or not.

[rum77]

16600