The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2009, 08:27 AM   #31
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxmoore View Post
By holding their values, I presume you mean to append "at the expense of potential owners"? I can't figure out how this could be a sustainable model.
I've thought about this for a while, and I can't see how it would be sustainable. Now it would make sense that they push these back into the market place at a later date. For example, my AD tends to get M-series watches shipped to them when they need to add to their inventory. So this may be the result of Rolex releasing their old stock back out, or repurchased stock. This method does not make sense in the long run if they continue to make watches at the rate that they do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebot View Post
That would also make sense, but you can't have a limited production for most or all models.
Actually, considering the prices that they have started charging and the fact that their watches don't change all that frequently (noting the exceptions of the new big cased watches), the only things that Rolex tends to change are dial options on DJs and the like, they could decrease their output. They would have to probably lay off some workers, but ultimately this may be better than than their current strategy. The sub has been the same for the most part for many years. If the want to charge the prices that they do, then they need to be more exclusive. The sheer volume they produce alone diminishes the air of exclusivity. Don't get me wrong, I like it that they can keep the secondary market prices higher, but that doesn't really affect me as I'm not looking to sell.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:42 AM   #32
pdmlynek
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
Wouldn't it make more sense to make less?

Well, there is a happy medium that you'd like to be at.

A business normally would just set the price so that the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost. (dP/dq = 0, if I remember college correctly). You do not want to set the price too low (because although you'd be selling more units there will be too little profit per unit), nor would you set the price too high (because although you'd be making more profit per unit you'd be selling too few units).
pdmlynek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:51 AM   #33
pdmlynek
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablojota View Post
I would prefer they do it by limiting production versus buying back what they make.
Aside from the transaction costs, from our view as customers isn't this effectively the same thing?

From the company's perspective, limiting production in bad times and increasing production in good times is extremely expensive proposition: they'd need to hire people, train them, lay them off, build new production lines, shut them down, etc. Especially in labor intensive, expensive labor, market. If they have the capital to carry the produced unshipped goods, it might be better to have a steady stream of units being produced, and warehousing them.

But I must assume that Rolex knows very well what they are doing.
pdmlynek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:07 AM   #34
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
i would assume rolex knows they have a huge mess on their hands. nobody is going to pay retail for a product they know was selling so badly it had to be bought back by the factory, sorry but people aren't that stupid. that would be like expecting auto buyers to pay retail for a new car now, it's not going to happen.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:32 AM   #35
jlovda
"TRF" Member
 
jlovda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmr View Post
i would assume rolex knows they have a huge mess on their hands. nobody is going to pay retail for a product they know was selling so badly it had to be bought back by the factory, sorry but people aren't that stupid. that would be like expecting auto buyers to pay retail for a new car now, it's not going to happen.
A lot of people have no idea about this kind of economic manipulation and Rolex business would probably only show up in the business section of Swiss newspapers, not the Chicago Tribune, etc. (forget the exotic watch magazines).

I can remember the first time I read in a magazine article that Rolex makes between 750,000 and 1,000,000 watches a year. That sounded like Timex to me. I couldn't believe it! It probably makes sense but subconsciously we are programmed by advertising to think that only a few hundred thousand leave the factory for worldwide distribution. The fact that we see a windowed clean room with maybe a dozen people in white lab coats laboring over the movements (in no particular hurry) reinforces that.

One thing you won't hear about is how many finished movements, cases without serial numbers or other assemblies are being stockpiled in order to maintain production.
jlovda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:39 AM   #36
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
It's all very interesting, Rolex will probably be forced to reduce production. I was with Jess yesterday and he got a very good discount on a very popular model. Discount a typically very hard to obtain in Orlando and I have seen tire kickers laughed at and even asked to leave the store for asking for discount, that was in the past. You could tell the AD really did not want to give the discount and it took awhile to get, but they need to move watches and caved in.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:09 AM   #37
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlovda View Post
A lot of people have no idea about this kind of economic manipulation and Rolex business would probably only show up in the business section of Swiss newspapers, not the Chicago Tribune, etc. (forget the exotic watch magazines).

I can remember the first time I read in a magazine article that Rolex makes between 750,000 and 1,000,000 watches a year. That sounded like Timex to me. I couldn't believe it! It probably makes sense but subconsciously we are programmed by advertising to think that only a few hundred thousand leave the factory for worldwide distribution. The fact that we see a windowed clean room with maybe a dozen people in white lab coats laboring over the movements (in no particular hurry) reinforces that.

One thing you won't hear about is how many finished movements, cases without serial numbers or other assemblies are being stockpiled in order to maintain production.
if they don't know it is their own fault, the internet is here and working well. in bad economic times people research tings better than most think. 20 years ago i would have agreed with that line of thinking but not now.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:17 AM   #38
DARK_KNIGHT
"TRF" Member
 
DARK_KNIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jack
Location: Dothan
Watch: Cartier
Posts: 1,236
Icon14

I can't see why ROLEX will be forced to do anything. The ones forced to do something is the human race that has been affected by the economy, because there might not be as much credit available [as before] and some people got Madoff-tized or other little wicked investment schemes, but in the grand order of things, how many people have actually lost part of it or all of it from the total multi-billion population of planet earth?

Why do I opine so?

There are enough of us that buy into the: "oh it's got such and such a movement...........", "yeah but it can go down to this depth............." "yeah but it can withstand electrical fields..............." "but this one passed the wiggle test............" We have given ourselves a reason to justify the expense, investment, or whatever we tell ourselves. The name is related to the coming of success, wealth, wannabe-ism, etc.....

There are the new generations (that we are training) that will repeat the mantra of : "oh it's got such and such a movement...........", "yeah but it can go down to this depth............." "yeah but it can withstand electrical fields..............." "but this one passed the wiggle test............".

If ROLEX is buying back stock, I won't be surprised. They must have cash stocks as large as the Federal Reserve. It's a mass produced watch but not many know that and those of us that do, don't seem to care. It's well made thou. Those of us that own them are happy and those that don't might want one. We are part of the 1,000,000.00 per year club, wow, how exclusive is that (lol)!!!!!
Rolex does want it wants, not what we want...........they can do it because the 1million per year club continues to buy them despite the yearly increases, all Geneva needs to do is to keep making minor changes and giving it fancy names like (parachrome blue). It's not going to change until the buyers force it to change............look at the former largest corporation in the world, GMC. Change came and big time. But ROLEX is pretty much on firm footing and will probably never come in danger of us forcing them to do anything. When I say "us", I mean the market.

My prediction is:

Once the new TT/SUB becomes available later this year..........people will pay premiums to be the first to own one. 6 - 8 months later the prices will come down and settle.............but the first on the bandwagon, the ones that cannot wait for a better deal............now that dear reader is the power of the ROLEX NAME. It's amazing. Economy? What economy?
DARK_KNIGHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:21 AM   #39
allanofcalifornia
"TRF" Member
 
allanofcalifornia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
I think it makes sense and it's good for those who own or plan to own a Rolex. If they did nothing, then the value of a Rolex could go way down and lose the high end appeal. I would hope everyone on TRF would like to keep the image of their Rolex watches as special and not just a watch that everyone buys.


Allan
allanofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:44 AM   #40
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
makes sense to me - they have a name and reputation to protect.
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 11:04 AM   #41
jlovda
"TRF" Member
 
jlovda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmr View Post
if they don't know it is their own fault, the internet is here and working well. in bad economic times people research tings better than most think. 20 years ago i would have agreed with that line of thinking but not now.
There was another thread on this forum about bad customer service at an AD. To make a long story short, this fellow "had a good sales month" and on the spur of the moment stopped in at his AD on the was home from work and was ready to drop down up to $20K except there was only one salesman and the guy was busy with another customer. He left emptyhanded. It didn't sound to me like he was doing Google searches at his office before he got in his car. I don't doubt that he probably knew roughly what kind of discount he could expect from previous purchases. There are a lot of people who walk into stores on Fifth Ave. or Rodeo Dr. and just buy what they like. Their accountant is the only one who sees the bill.
jlovda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 11:07 AM   #42
trickyric
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: florida
Watch: Daytona ss
Posts: 51
I get the idea of reducing supply on the street so when we break out of reccesion the prices and values for new watches won't be reduced by overstock in the marketplace but they should also do a price freeze because raising your prices with reducing sales is ussually a bad plan in any buisness.
trickyric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 11:41 AM   #43
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
interesting read....thanks for posting this!
+1
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 01:27 PM   #44
STEELINOX
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
STEELINOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
Interesting.

Why don't they just reduce production? If they are so cash rich, that saves them money too instead of continuing to flood the market with product only to "possibly" buy it back. Reducing supply is certainly more palatable than removing comleted product from stores.
I think on this point the idea for ROLEX to have inventory returned from market is to have these pieces taken apart and destroyed, the casings at least; this keeps their staff "working" and not laying them off, canibalizing the remaining parts for future cases with new serials. It in fact keeps people working and removes inventory from market and keeps things in order, somewhat anyways...
Thanks,
Randy
STEELINOX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 03:38 PM   #45
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
I would think this "buyback" maybe an option for AD's who are having problems. However, I still see watches that are several years old that are still sitting at AD's, the oldest is a W serial. I don't see Rolex buying those back and help the AD's out. Maybe they will only take back the more recent models?
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 03:45 PM   #46
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdmlynek View Post
Well, there is a happy medium that you'd like to be at.

A business normally would just set the price so that the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost. (dP/dq = 0, if I remember college correctly). You do not want to set the price too low (because although you'd be selling more units there will be too little profit per unit), nor would you set the price too high (because although you'd be making more profit per unit you'd be selling too few units).
Differential calculus in TRF - must be a first!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 03:56 PM   #47
C. Davidson
"TRF" Member
 
C. Davidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: WXSW
Watch: GMT (116710)
Posts: 2,723
Thanks for the post, very enlightening.
__________________
-Cheers, Chris
#15,634

"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out."
C. Davidson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:05 PM   #48
DanP
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
Good thing I got a rad discount on the GV in HK. Im wondering if this(OP) stated was a north america thing and not elsewhere? interesting both ways. I know from relatives in HK business is smooth as silk for luxury watches
DanP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:05 PM   #49
Starwalker
"TRF" Member
 
Starwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by argee1977 View Post
Quite a lot of companies do this, and depending on the product a lot of them manipulate the second hand market as well to keep the new price within a set parameter. The way they do this is to use some of the production run for employees and other personnel, then once they've used them for 3 months change over, then they stockpile the 'secondhand' items and put them onto the market depending on how the price is doing, if the price is too low they reduce the stock they put on the market, if it's too high they put more on.

With Rolex though they've gone too high, too quickly, the market allowed the prices to rise to this level due to the economy being on a high, credit being freely available and people moving their collateral around to free up money and buy that watch they always wanted. But now we're in a recession, the people who had equity or freedom to spend thousands aren't doing so, or can't, yet the Rolex prices stay the same. I think it may come to a head in the next couple of years, Rolex can't continue to buy back stock for an extended period of time, and that's going to mean they'll need to change something within their business plan.
X2! Bring out new models to justify high prices...GMT-Cs (w/colored cereamics) / New Subs / Facelift the YM / New DJ II / New DD II / New Daytonas......Milgauss.....make a lotta funky watches, and maintain exlusivitivy....lets just hope the dont furthere increase there prices....and our wages....increase with the soon to be high rate of inflation
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds
Starwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:40 PM   #50
handdoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 328
good idea for rolex considering the second hand market pricing is at the lowest in years
handdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:22 PM   #51
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Makes perfect sense, It's just like a cash rich company buying it's own stock to maintain it's share price and the value of shares for the shareowners. Normal supply and demand models are different for luxury goods, brands like Breitling and Omega go down the discount route and we all know what that does for resale values.
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:34 PM   #52
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlovda View Post
There was another thread on this forum about bad customer service at an AD. To make a long story short, this fellow "had a good sales month" and on the spur of the moment stopped in at his AD on the was home from work and was ready to drop down up to $20K except there was only one salesman and the guy was busy with another customer. He left emptyhanded. It didn't sound to me like he was doing Google searches at his office before he got in his car. I don't doubt that he probably knew roughly what kind of discount he could expect from previous purchases. There are a lot of people who walk into stores on Fifth Ave. or Rodeo Dr. and just buy what they like. Their accountant is the only one who sees the bill.

don't get me wrong, there are a few people that will do that. the problem is once you have sold to that 1% then you have to get the other 99% of your customers to buy. in the car business those people are called a rollover. they just rollover and pay the price, they are few and far in between.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 09:41 PM   #53
Rolex116520
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex116520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: EEC
Watch: Daytona & Deepsea
Posts: 2,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARK_KNIGHT View Post
I can't see why ROLEX will be forced to do anything. The ones forced to do something is the human race that has been affected by the economy, because there might not be as much credit available [as before] and some people got Madoff-tized or other little wicked investment schemes, but in the grand order of things, how many people have actually lost part of it or all of it from the total multi-billion population of planet earth?

Why do I opine so?

There are enough of us that buy into the: "oh it's got such and such a movement...........", "yeah but it can go down to this depth............." "yeah but it can withstand electrical fields..............." "but this one passed the wiggle test............" We have given ourselves a reason to justify the expense, investment, or whatever we tell ourselves. The name is related to the coming of success, wealth, wannabe-ism, etc.....

There are the new generations (that we are training) that will repeat the mantra of : "oh it's got such and such a movement...........", "yeah but it can go down to this depth............." "yeah but it can withstand electrical fields..............." "but this one passed the wiggle test............".

If ROLEX is buying back stock, I won't be surprised. They must have cash stocks as large as the Federal Reserve. It's a mass produced watch but not many know that and those of us that do, don't seem to care. It's well made thou. Those of us that own them are happy and those that don't might want one. We are part of the 1,000,000.00 per year club, wow, how exclusive is that (lol)!!!!!
Rolex does want it wants, not what we want...........they can do it because the 1million per year club continues to buy them despite the yearly increases, all Geneva needs to do is to keep making minor changes and giving it fancy names like (parachrome blue). It's not going to change until the buyers force it to change............look at the former largest corporation in the world, GMC. Change came and big time. But ROLEX is pretty much on firm footing and will probably never come in danger of us forcing them to do anything. When I say "us", I mean the market.

My prediction is:

Once the new TT/SUB becomes available later this year..........people will pay premiums to be the first to own one. 6 - 8 months later the prices will come down and settle.............but the first on the bandwagon, the ones that cannot wait for a better deal............now that dear reader is the power of the ROLEX NAME. It's amazing. Economy? What economy?
VERY VERY TRUE , would we buy the exact same watch at the same price if it doesn't say ROLEX on it ? It is certainly an excellent watch but we do pay 50% for the product itself and we are also willing to pay 50 % extra for the name and what it represents ... succes , some wealth etc..
I was a couple of weeks with my uncle ( he has enormous business contacts all over the world and one particularly with the owner of one of the largest watch stores in Hong Kong ) he recently bought a Richard Mille with 40% discount , but I still could not afford 25 % of that , we sat down at a terrace with some friends and family . A couple of people made remarks about my SDDS being it the latest Rolex ... blabla and how expensive they and hence as I got a couple of them how well I must be doing . Nobody remarked my uncle's , none had a clue what it was let along its price tag. Can't say that Richard Mille watches are discrete looking watches really .
Just to say that ROLEX has this world wide image and they sell it well .
Rolex116520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:07 PM   #54
jdc
"TRF" Member
 
jdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
Sounds a strange business model and/or is evidence that they have there pricing wrong and a panic measure to prop up their stance.
If it is true they are hoping that the economy gets back to levels of a couple of years ago, if not they are going to have egg on their faces and will have to admit pricing is wrong and start discounting or lowering prices before all the AD's go out of business
jdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:51 PM   #55
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
I don't have a MBA, but it seems all very simple to me. Let's pretend that Rolex isn't manufacturing and selling fine watches, but instead it's the lowly widget. They have an assembly line with widgets coming out at the end. Demand doesn't meet the supply of the widgets, so they start piling up at the end of the distribution chain. Market pressures prices down, as those who hold title to the amassing widgets want to turn them over, to free up capital.

There is only two ways of dealing with the problem: either decrease production, or increase consumer demand. Buying back inventory is not a solution.

What buying back inventory does, is open a possibilty to take over full vertical distribution of their product. Being a global company, Rolex can not, all at one time, globally replicate their current distribution system with company owned retail stores, being the exclusive source for Rolex watches. But they can do it in a key market, provided the domstic antitrust alws permit complete vertical intergration.

So my thought is, lets say they take a large market: USA, GB, or France for example. Pick a country. Start terminating AD's, and buy back their inventories, so as not to make waves in the marketplace, and keep things hush hush with as a condition of buying back the terminated AD's inventory, the AD agrees to sign a MDA. That way everything is kept quiet. I don't know the term of the distributor agreements with Rolex AD's but usually those agreements don't run more than a year or two, they have to be annually or biannually renewed. So they can cycle out all the existing AD's in the subject market, in a couple of years. Once the only legitimate way of buying a new Rolex in that particular market is at a Rolex boutique at full SR, then Rolex is complete control of the market for their watches.

Now, the big issue is antitrust. I do not pretend to be an anti-trust expert, so I defer to the other memebrs of this board as to whether such a plan would violate price fixing laws. Once there is a restrain on the prices the consumer pays, it becomes circumspect to me.

Whattya think?
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 10:52 PM   #56
djoseph1174
"TRF" Member
 
djoseph1174's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Daphne, AL
Posts: 38
Good info
djoseph1174 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 11:13 PM   #57
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by nylawbiz View Post
I don't have a MBA, but it seems all very simple to me. Let's pretend that Rolex isn't manufacturing and selling fine watches, but instead it's the lowly widget. They have an assembly line with widgets coming out at the end. Demand doesn't meet the supply of the widgets, so they start piling up at the end of the distribution chain. Market pressures prices down, as those who hold title to the amassing widgets want to turn them over, to free up capital.

There is only two ways of dealing with the problem: either decrease production, or increase consumer demand. Buying back inventory is not a solution.

What buying back inventory does, is open a possibilty to take over full vertical distribution of their product. Being a global company, Rolex can not, all at one time, globally replicate their current distribution system with company owned retail stores, being the exclusive source for Rolex watches. But they can do it in a key market, provided the domstic antitrust alws permit complete vertical intergration.

So my thought is, lets say they take a large market: USA, GB, or France for example. Pick a country. Start terminating AD's, and buy back their inventories, so as not to make waves in the marketplace, and keep things hush hush with as a condition of buying back the terminated AD's inventory, the AD agrees to sign a MDA. That way everything is kept quiet. I don't know the term of the distributor agreements with Rolex AD's but usually those agreements don't run more than a year or two, they have to be annually or biannually renewed. So they can cycle out all the existing AD's in the subject market, in a couple of years. Once the only legitimate way of buying a new Rolex in that particular market is at a Rolex boutique at full SR, then Rolex is complete control of the market for their watches.

Now, the big issue is antitrust. I do not pretend to be an anti-trust expert, so I defer to the other memebrs of this board as to whether such a plan would violate price fixing laws. Once there is a restrain on the prices the consumer pays, it becomes circumspect to me.

Whattya think?
i agree, the anti trust they could probably deal with in one fashion or another but keeping it quiet i think would be a problem. too many ways for the info to leak out.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2009, 01:07 AM   #58
rolexBuddy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas, US
Posts: 123
I don't think antitrust really applies to the buyback program for Rolex. Antitrust would've applied if Rolex was buying back their competitors and increasing the prices on those watches to drive customers to buy Rolex. In Rolex case, all they are doing is buying back inventory AD cannot sell. And I'm sure they don't have to strong arm dealers either, as those are happy to free up capital to buy something they can move - either jewelry or other brand of watches. The only company with risk here is Rolex themselves. They either out wait the resession and keep the trademark of never decreasing prices, or being forced to allow bigger discounts or actually lowering MSRP. In both last cases they loose as they have to figure out what to do with old inventory.
rolexBuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2009, 01:10 AM   #59
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexBuddy View Post
I don't think antitrust really applies to the buyback program for Rolex. Antitrust would've applied if Rolex was buying back their competitors and increasing the prices on those watches to drive customers to buy Rolex. In Rolex case, all they are doing is buying back inventory AD cannot sell. And I'm sure they don't have to strong arm dealers either, as those are happy to free up capital to buy something they can move - either jewelry or other brand of watches. The only company with risk here is Rolex themselves. They either out wait the resession and keep the trademark of never decreasing prices, or being forced to allow bigger discounts or actually lowering MSRP. In both last cases they loose as they have to figure out what to do with old inventory.
I believe the question of antitrust was actually with regards to Rolex revoking AD licenses verse the buyback. Buy back is not illegal, just a question of being a sustainable business practice.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2009, 04:48 AM   #60
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexBuddy View Post
I don't think antitrust really applies to the buyback program for Rolex. Antitrust would've applied if Rolex was buying back their competitors and increasing the prices on those watches to drive customers to buy Rolex. In Rolex case, all they are doing is buying back inventory AD cannot sell. And I'm sure they don't have to strong arm dealers either, as those are happy to free up capital to buy something they can move - either jewelry or other brand of watches. The only company with risk here is Rolex themselves. They either out wait the resession and keep the trademark of never decreasing prices, or being forced to allow bigger discounts or actually lowering MSRP. In both last cases they loose as they have to figure out what to do with old inventory.
I was referring to a scheme where Rolex eliminates their AD's in a particular market, and only sell direct to consumers at Rolex company owned stores, at full MSRP.
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 32 (0 members and 32 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.