ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JRell · 8 January 2023, 12:09 AM

You don’t bring all 3 watches around with you. You wear one at a time. If you love wearing each one uniquely, then that is all that matters.

Dr.Stu · 8 January 2023, 04:23 PM

I voted for "redundant". But, pretty-much everyone on this forum appreciates the differences between them, why one would want to own (keep) all of them, and recognizes that to the general public they are visually identical.

If you only had these 3 watches & had to move one out to move one in, I'd move one or two out & diversify your look. (I, for one, would keep the GMT and move the others.) That not being the case, I'd keep enjoying them all just as you are!

Nairn1980 · 8 January 2023, 06:26 PM

It’s all a bit dull colour wise.
I’d change the Exp2 to polar, GMT to a Pepsi or BLNR and you’re headed in the right direction
Personally I’d lose the 36mm explorer as well, way too small in my opinion, when clearly you’re able to wear a 42mm explorer 2

Just my humble thoughts

T3rmina1 · 8 January 2023, 07:22 PM

Think the sub and the LN GMT are too similar, and the LN GMT and the Explorer 2 have the same complication. I think I completely agree with Nairn1980

View Poll Results: Redundant or good 3 watch combo?
Redundant	165	77.83%
Good Land Air Sea combo	47	22.17%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

8 January 2023, 12:09 AM	#61
JRell "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Pittsburgh Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee Posts: 7,084	You don’t bring all 3 watches around with you. You wear one at a time. If you love wearing each one uniquely, then that is all that matters. __________________ 126710 BLNR Jubilee

8 January 2023, 04:23 PM	#62
Dr.Stu 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: New York City Posts: 625	I voted for "redundant". But, pretty-much everyone on this forum appreciates the differences between them, why one would want to own (keep) all of them, and recognizes that to the general public they are visually identical. If you only had these 3 watches & had to move one out to move one in, I'd move one or two out & diversify your look. (I, for one, would keep the GMT and move the others.) That not being the case, I'd keep enjoying them all just as you are! __________________ “Own time or time will own you.” —Brian Norgard

8 January 2023, 06:26 PM	#63
Nairn1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: UK Watch: GMT Posts: 8,385	It’s all a bit dull colour wise. I’d change the Exp2 to polar, GMT to a Pepsi or BLNR and you’re headed in the right direction Personally I’d lose the 36mm explorer as well, way too small in my opinion, when clearly you’re able to wear a 42mm explorer 2 Just my humble thoughts

8 January 2023, 07:22 PM	#64
T3rmina1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2022 Location: The Wired Posts: 77	Think the sub and the LN GMT are too similar, and the LN GMT and the Explorer 2 have the same complication. I think I completely agree with Nairn1980

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)