ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 July 2009, 05:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Jet
Location: SoCal, USA
Watch: SD/Sub/GMT/Daytona
Posts: 796
|
|
30 July 2009, 07:48 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,254
|
Good enough for Sean Connery/007....good enough for me.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
30 July 2009, 07:54 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hampshire,England
Watch: TT Datejust
Posts: 446
|
The Sub and the Datejust to me are the most iconic watches because in 50+ years they have changed so little and they share a damn good movement which will keep good time even with the odd bump or two. Ok. I own both so I'm biased...
__________________
No present like the time. |
30 July 2009, 08:02 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 16
|
My first love was the Sub. As soon as I could afford it, I bought the TT Blue Sub. I have had it for 5 years and love it as much now as I did when I first go it.
The irony is that I usually hate the quotidian and I think a lot more people have the sub over the GMT. However, I had to get my Sub. I'm mad I'm not wearing it today |
30 July 2009, 08:03 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 16
|
Also, I like how well this thread went. I thought the OP was going to get skewered, but everyone played nice.
I do like the GMT and could see myself buying it in a few years, but the Sub was my Grail watch. |
30 July 2009, 10:25 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 117
|
Missing a 'U' in your log in name
|
30 July 2009, 03:29 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
__________________
E |
30 July 2009, 03:53 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
To each his own. I think the Sub is the qunitessential Rolex, embodying all the qualities that the brand stands for, such as good looks, toughness and elegance. Then again, I dislike the shape and looks of Ferraris and Porsches and would never buy one, even if I had the money.
|
30 July 2009, 04:22 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: David
Location: UK/Qatar
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 470
|
A green limited was my first Rolex I have since swapped it for a Yachtmaster SS which I still own. I have never missed the Sub and have had several other Rolex sporrts models,the new Sub holds no real appeal though a single/double red will be a watch that I will own in the future (the older ones do appeal to me)
|
30 July 2009, 05:03 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
|
30 July 2009, 05:00 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 417
|
I love the Sub. I thought the Datejust was THE iconic Rolex, but after having the opportunity to own one it was not the right one for me (still hugely iconic). I like the sporty watches better, and I would love to own a Sub one day.
__________________
I have to be successful because I like expensive things. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.