ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 August 2023, 02:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 4
|
Hello. Advice on Explorer 1016?
Hello all,
This is my fathers 1959 1016 Explorer. He wore this watch pretty much every day for most of his life and at some point in time he replaced the original bracelet with an aftermarket one. I have no idea where the original bracelet is. Anyway, I would like to know if it is worth seeking out a replacement riveted Rolex bracelet for it from around the same period, or to simply put a new bracelet on which a local AD offered to me for just over 1000 bucks. Thanks much. photos attached. |
27 August 2023, 03:16 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
We can't see the photos, but I think it's really a matter of personal preference.
With some patience, you can find a nice Swiss rivet bracelet, but you will probably pay about $2500. Personally, I like rivet bracelets a lot, so I would prefer to wear it on a rivet bracelet. But I would be satisfied with finding the correct type of bracelet. Finding one from 1959 would be challenging, and maybe not worth the trouble. If I found a good one from 1966, for example, I'd be fine with that. Other people will say that rivet bracelets feel flimsy, they don't like wearing them, and they're afraid they will break. Modern bracelets have a more solid feel, and obviously a brand new bracelet will be more robust. So it really depends on budget, taste, and how much emotional value you place on having a period-correct bracelet.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
27 August 2023, 04:05 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I would not have any issues with putting a more modern bracelet on an early classic watch. It's new, fresh, and in top shape.
Bracelets and straps were never meant to last forever and are expected to be replaced when they wear out and is common to see. If for some reason you have a bug to have it "era correct", then that is valid too, and part of the enjoyment for a watch enthusiast. No right or wrong here.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
27 August 2023, 04:34 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 4
|
Hi all,
Thanks for that feedback, and sorry I couldn't post the images here. I tried to post a link to the photos on Flickr but it didn't work. I've searched Chrono24 and some other places and there are a few older bracelets out there, circa 1960s. They seem to go for around 3 or 4k. Last edited by Lightexplorer; 27 August 2023 at 04:49 AM.. Reason: made mistake |
27 August 2023, 04:54 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 4
|
I think I will take your advice and get a new one from my AD in town here. I'm guessing my dad replaced the original a very long time ago when I was in high school. I have the boxes, paperwork, and warranty with it, which is at least something.
Many Thanks to you all. |
27 August 2023, 04:58 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
Quote:
Still, even $2500 is a lot of money for a bracelet. I just really like the rivet bracelets.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
27 August 2023, 05:09 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Yes, I agree. I think they look good too. Unfortunately, I will never know what my dad did with the original. Perhaps I will sit on it for a while and think it over. I did see a 1959 riveted bracket in very good order for just under 10k which I most certainly can't afford. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.