The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 July 2023, 12:16 AM   #31
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,549
I respect the engineering marvel of the reference but it kinda reminds me of a desk clock put on a bracelet.
Not for me but good luck getting one to those whom desire to wear it.
__________________
___________________

GMT II 126719 Meteorite + GMT II 126710BLRO + Daytona 116500LN (White) + Submariner 16610LV + Explorer II 16570 Polar
+ Submariner 116610LV + GMT II 16713 Rootbeer + Sky-Dweller 336934 (Blue) + GMT II 16710 (Pepsi & Coke) + Sea-Dweller 116600

Breitling Premier B25 Datora

2FA Security Active
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2023, 12:33 AM   #32
diracpoint
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
Exactly, and as a diver and collector of Sub and Sea Dweller it's a marvel of engineering. That's my pull to it.
Of course, and considering what it means for Rolex and and their history of deep-sea explorations, it was a no-brainer for me. When I was reading the news release last year (I think it was Nov 1), I just couldn't believe they decided to release this historically significant piece. I was pretty much done with Rolex but after this release I had to get in touch with my AD! Just when I thought I was out, they pulled me back in! Ha ha!

Are you planning on getting one?


diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 01:18 AM   #33
creepy neville
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Neville
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: 136660 Deepsea
Posts: 127
Awesome watch !

Apparently I’m the next to receive one at my AD - literally can’t wait!
creepy neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 11:12 AM   #34
diracpoint
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepy neville View Post
Awesome watch !

Apparently I’m the next to receive one at my AD - literally can’t wait!
Looking forward to the incoming, my friend! You'll love it!!!
diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 11:42 AM   #35
CFR
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,075
6" (154mm) wrist. Had to try to try it on!



CFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 01:55 PM   #36
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
Have you had the opportunity to try one on in the wild?
Not yet, but I hope to.
Not wishing to derail the thread but I di try on a Titanium Ultra Deep a few days ago and a SS version. The SS is nice and bright where as the Titanium is very matte and grey.

The Titanium of the Challenge looks great in pics.
Hopefully I'll get to see one
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 02:00 PM   #37
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
Exactly, and as a diver and collector of Sub and Sea Dweller it's a marvel of engineering. That's my pull to it.
And rightly so
With a 7 3/4" wrist you'll be fine to indulge

I fear it will be too big for me so I'll have to settle for its little brother.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 02:35 PM   #38
RCC watches
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay,California
Watch: EXPII & OP41
Posts: 150
Display model on my 7.5 inch wrist
Attached Images
   
RCC watches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 05:19 PM   #39
waterman1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 889
Wrist shot

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCC watches View Post
Display model on my 7.5 inch wrist
Hold on! Is this even the same giant watch? It actually looks “appropriately” sized in these photos on 7.25” wrist!! Looks good!
waterman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 05:21 PM   #40
waterman1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 889
I see 7.5, not 7.25 but still. Not a large wrist and it does not look too large. Surprising me.
waterman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 07:14 PM   #41
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 879
Incredibly entertaining thread.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2023, 09:18 PM   #42
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterman1 View Post
I see 7.5, not 7.25 but still. Not a large wrist and it does not look too large. Surprising me.
Oh it really does look too large!
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 11:45 AM   #43
gtnator
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCC watches View Post
Display model on my 7.5 inch wrist

Fits perfect


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 12:16 PM   #44
georgew
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: George
Location: USA
Watch: mostly Subs
Posts: 804
that is indeed a MASSIVE watch! Sorry, but in other than true professional use (diving/maritime pursuits) it does kind of look "contrived" and maybe working too hard to stand out - personal view. But, to each their own.
georgew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 12:24 PM   #45
samsmart
"TRF" Member
 
samsmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
I will get torched for this, but it seems comically large. Invicta-ish

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
samsmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 12:26 PM   #46
Gaussian
"TRF" Member
 
Gaussian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 116400GV Z-Blue
Posts: 205
To all the naysayers, I will say a Rolex is not a watch intended for every person, just as the Challenge is not a Rolex intended for every wrist.

My James Cameron almost gets lost on my wrist.

I’ve been downright yearning for a Rolex that would solve this problem, and now that one exists, I’m stuck battling for an allocation with people that will buy this for a short-term profit or else buy it and lament on TRF that Rolex shouldn’t produce something that looks like a clock on their five-inch wrist.

Are you listening Doug?





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gaussian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 04:18 PM   #47
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by donq View Post
I have yet to see a pic of anyone wearing this that doesn’t look like a little kid wearing his daddy’s watch.

Maybe a body builder or Andre the Giant could pull it off?

Seriously it’s cringy on anyone else.

Totally agree! Looks too large on everybody! What is the diameter and thickness?

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 05:24 PM   #48
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaussian View Post
To all the naysayers, I will say a Rolex is not a watch intended for every person, just as the Challenge is not a Rolex intended for every wrist.

My James Cameron almost gets lost on my wrist.

I’ve been downright yearning for a Rolex that would solve this problem, and now that one exists, I’m stuck battling for an allocation with people that will buy this for a short-term profit or else buy it and lament on TRF that Rolex shouldn’t produce something that looks like a clock on their five-inch wrist.

Are you listening Doug?





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This doesn't look lost on your wrist at all though.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 09:34 PM   #49
georgew
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: George
Location: USA
Watch: mostly Subs
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsmart View Post
I will get torched for this, but it seems comically large. Invicta-ish

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
this is my initial reaction as well. YMMV of course
georgew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 11:37 PM   #50
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
I'm fine with people buying and wearing whatever they are comfortable with. In terms of looks to me, the top end of the range is "it doesn't look as bad I as I would have thought." Knowing the technology behind it, I think it looks better than when someone with a five inch wrist posts a shot with their 44mm AP ROO.

It seems to me that the thickness of it is impossible to overcome, even for those with a giant wrist.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2023, 11:46 PM   #51
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
I can appreciate it for what it is … a technical achievement and innovative reference.

I wouldn’t be a buyer or wearer but that’s not to disparage anyone who chooses to own it or wear it
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2023, 12:53 AM   #52
Brian Page
"TRF" Member
 
Brian Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,625
Enjoying mine

Sent from my SM-F731U1 using Tapatalk
Brian Page is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2023, 06:17 AM   #53
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgew View Post
that is indeed a MASSIVE watch! Sorry, but in other than true professional use (diving/maritime pursuits) it does kind of look "contrived" and maybe working too hard to stand out - personal view. But, to each their own.
Seriously?
From what i can see of it, it doesn't "work too hard" at anything other than establishing the minimum size required for a watch that's literally engineered to withstand the water pressure at the very bottom of the ocean in accordance with the international standard for a dive watch which is tested to 125% of its depth rating.
In summary, it can't possibly be any smaller given the materials chosen so how can it be contrived other than its reason for existing?
Depending on context a lot of or most divers watches could fall into the category
If it was made of Tungsten then maybe it could be more compact? But it would be heavier

The whole point of the watch is for it to be the very last word/knock out punch in the depth rating technology wars in a non-liquid filled format and still be wearable. By any measure, it succeeds in an admirable fashion.
I put it to you that if it goes against your sensibilities then so be it and you have the option of not puting in an expression of interest on it
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2023, 06:30 AM   #54
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Page View Post
Enjoying mine

Sent from my SM-F731U1 using Tapatalk
It looks sensational on that strap
Which strap is that one Brian?
I think I'll put mine(when I get it) on that strap for when I'm out on the boat for a quiet get away.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2023, 06:34 AM   #55
aehaas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: A. E. Haas, MD
Location: Sarasota, FL
Watch: DS Challenge
Posts: 140
7. 1/2" wrist:
Attached Images
   
aehaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2023, 11:19 AM   #56
georgew
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: George
Location: USA
Watch: mostly Subs
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Seriously?
From what i can see of it, it doesn't "work too hard" at anything other than establishing the minimum size required for a watch that's literally engineered to withstand the water pressure at the very bottom of the ocean in accordance with the international standard for a dive watch which is tested to 125% of its depth rating.
In summary, it can't possibly be any smaller given the materials chosen so how can it be contrived other than its reason for existing?
Depending on context a lot of or most divers watches could fall into the category
If it was made of Tungsten then maybe it could be more compact? But it would be heavier

The whole point of the watch is for it to be the very last word/knock out punch in the depth rating technology wars in a non-liquid filled format and still be wearable. By any measure, it succeeds in an admirable fashion.
I put it to you that if it goes against your sensibilities then so be it and you have the option of not puting in an expression of interest on it
I'm pretty sure you just made my point. Engineering and watchmaking marvel it certainly is - and suited for the very depths of the oceans. And by all means, wear whatever you like.
georgew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2023, 04:08 AM   #57
hbu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: san francisco
Posts: 53
On 6in / 154mm wrist.
Attached Images
   
hbu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2023, 04:32 AM   #58
messikens
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbu View Post
On 6in / 154mm wrist.

I think it works for you
messikens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2023, 05:44 AM   #59
georgew
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: George
Location: USA
Watch: mostly Subs
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by messikens View Post
I think it works for you
georgew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.