ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 November 2023, 08:19 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: mike
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 1,088
|
Historical relevance for justification
Every few months or so, I find myself thinking I need to pick up an Omega Speedmaster, and a Cartier Santos, simply for the historical relevance of each, respectively.
Had the newest version of the Santos, but sold it and regret that I did that. I’ve never owned a Speedmaster. Anyone else factor in historical significance as part of their collection?
__________________
DD40 RG, DD40 Platinum, Submariner Bluesy, WG YM 42, YM 40 |
6 November 2023, 08:26 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,071
|
I started down that road, it will twist your head pretty hard. One of the factors in my Santos purchase. I keep the Santos, sold the Speedy. No matter how many times I tried to convince myself of the historical significance of the Moon Watch, I just never wore it, doesn’t move me at all. Maybe if I could find a 321 I would sing a different tune on that piece.
It’s a hard collection philosophy. Where do you start and end? You can find yourself making some really weirdo justifications. Good luck. |
6 November 2023, 08:41 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,160
|
Get what makes you happy. I love my speedy, tho it is the special 50th anniv buzz butt. Hoping for Snoopy at some point.
__________________
__________________ ----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
6 November 2023, 08:49 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,982
|
Sort of. I don't think there's much historical weight to buying something that is heavily produced right now though.
It's why I have a 1960s 5513 and will probably grab a vintage chronograph at some point too. |
6 November 2023, 11:25 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,718
|
I think any historical significance has to come second to you liking/wanting a watch. The backstory is just the icing on the cake. But who the history behind a watch to me is meaningless unless you love a piece.
I appreciate a lot of watches for their historical contributions but just don’t love them enough to add it to the collection. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 November 2023, 11:46 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,074
|
I can relate OP.
Historical significance definately played a part in my decision to buy these three references. Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk |
6 November 2023, 04:59 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Basel
Watch: LF Sport & Pepsi
Posts: 1,008
|
You need to like the way the watch looks and fits on you. Everything else, like historical significance, brand prestige, power reserve, and what people on a forum think, is secondary.
I have a Speedy because it looks cool, feels good, and fits me perfectly. Sold my Daytona because it didn't feel as nice on my wrist as the Speedy (tho the Dayton is more prestigious... these days anyway). |
6 November 2023, 08:24 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Old continent
Posts: 2,462
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.