Rolex Submariner 124060 or Rolex Explorer 224270

[Daniel23456]

I am camp 36mm Explorer and own one. Also have a 14060m from 2012. 224270 vs 124060 the Sub is the winner for me. Now if it was a 124270… 124270 is nicer but sub 14060m is oit of this world good!

[londondude]

Sub first then explorer!

[Krash]

Submariner. No contest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sigmak]

You can't go wrong with both, but Submariner for sure!

[subtona]

Imho Explorer would have been ideal at 38mm while maintaining proper proportions and lugs.

While each size has been fine , they all seem to miss the mark by just a little.
As a result they each become very particular to the wearers wrist size.

[Meyrin]

The Submariner, for sure. I´d miss the bezel on the explorer...

[piratfisk]

Originally Posted by logo

At 40mm, the sub. If 36mm Exp vs sub, I choose explorer.

Correct answer IMO

Originally Posted by espanol

+1

+2!

Originally Posted by nyc2la

I choose the Explorer (39mm). It’s so comfortable, legible, and does everything I need.

This is a great answer. It's a good "middle ground" between the two.

[RoloRonnie]

Both great choices. I love how under the radar and less common the Explorer is.

But, for me, I can no longer live without glidelock. I just can’t. My wrist changes throughout the day.

Glidelock is the difference for me … so Sub. I own a 114060.

[Big Tex Rolex]

Not a fair fight … Submariner.

[Torshalla]

The Sub :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2b32dn]

submariner! the exp 2's case is a bit tad big for my wrist

[t65tampa]

Submariner hands down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Cassian739]

Submariner!

[Lacerta]

From these two Sub. But if compared to 36mm Explorer, that would be a tough choice for me )))

[Jerrocop]

Originally Posted by Abcdefg123

Which watch would you choose a Rolex Submariner 124060 or a Rolex Explorer 224270?

Currently an owner of a Rolex Explorer 2 226570 Polar dial

Go for the explorer but I know you want the sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk