The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 February 2024, 02:46 AM   #1
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,982
Ceramic Showdown - Zenith VS Girard-Perregaux VS Hublot VS Blancpain

For about a year now I’ve been looking for a ceramic watch that I can wear on vacations, to random countries I have to go to for work, etc. and not worry too much about. I love the idea of something basically scratchproof.

In March of 2023, I walked into a Hublot boutique and was totally surprised…

I thought they were all chunky 44mm+ watches in tacky colors.

But the boutique handed me a 42mm watch with an amazing integrated black ceramic bracelet and I immediately fell in love.

I ended up buying one used, but…

It turned out that was one in titanium not black!

I had accidentally bought the wrong one because I was browsing at like 2 am on my phone with lowlight settings engaged. Derp.

I liked the watch a lot but in black ceramic it was objectively much cooler and completely scratch resistant due to the ceramic.

Anyways, rebooted the hunt this month for a black ceramic watch…

I considered the following:

Zenith Defy Skyline.
Both openworked and closed dial variants. Felt like a less sleek version of some APs I’ve had. Didn’t really love that part of it. The weird pointless 10 second complication annoys me as well, feels like adds thickness without function to the watch. These are still weirdly pricey second hand. It just felt...jarring? With that said, I almost bought this somewhat impulsively from an AD I like. The openworked version has architecture that doesn’t help the watch and makes the open working look cheap, IMO. I ultimately couldn’t get over how it just felt like a worse version of the APs I’ve owned. I think with a few tweaks to make these more visually differentiated and sleek, they could be more interesting.

GP Laureato.
I considered the regular closed dial and much pricier openworked variant. I wanted this to win but the bracelet isn’t nearly as cool as the zenith or the Hublot. It’s too bulbous/round. I could not find the openworked in person to try, which may have made me ok with the bracelet…so passed on this. Couldn’t help but feel this was the inbred cousin of a nautilus. If I had been able to see the openworked in person first, maybe I’d change my mind. Finishing was a little underwhelming on the closed dial variants that I messed with.

Blancpain Bathyscaphe
This was the watch I was most surprised by. Wow. The finishing here is mind blowing for what these go for used. Very thick anglage and well done. Dial was kinda boring though and there is no bracelet for the ceramic case version. Other issue is that these are a little big. I think one of these is in my future anyways…hard to resist at the price point. I’m shocked these aren’t more popular in the 6k used price range. Side note, chronograph variant was great too but a little thick for me.

Bvlgari Octo Finissimo.
I had one of these before in grey and considered the matte black ceramic version. However, my other one had a rotor issue and apparently it’s quite common for the previous generation of the finissimo…so that killed my want for it. Additionally wasn’t huge on how wide/large that watch wears. It’s kind of awkward for every day wear.

So that led me to the Hublot…

Here is why I picked it:

Awesome integrated ceramic bracelet. It looks very aggressive and the light play is amazing. Being able to desk dive all I want without scratching my watch is great. Extremely comfortable as well and no crazy sharp ends. Relatively thin and very very comfy. Super important to me because this is my new daily. Maybe one of the most comfortable watches I’ve owned? The watch isn’t crazy thin or anything but the case shape and sharply downturned lugs make a huge difference, especially when you compare it to something like the Zenith Defy. That being said would still have preferred 40mm to 42mm.

The finishing on this watch isn’t anything crazy or special on the movement/dial. The movement architecture does a much better job of making it look good versus the openworked defy - which looks cheap. The industrial finishing is ok for a very industrial looking piece like this imo. Suits it well when you look at the watch more holistically. There is some nice black polishing visible and a few other touches I enjoyed like the brushing etc. It’s easy to see a lot of effort went into the bracelet and case, both of which are very very exceptional, especially the bracelet. Lots of polished parts that pop in light and are difficult to photograph. Given the bracelet makes or breaks an integrated watch like this, I don’t mind that they clearly allocated some $ into that over movement finishing. You are clearly paying a premium for ceramic here, but that’s the same thing with just about every other ceramic variant of a watch.

All that said, it’s a little annoying my grand seikos are better finished in a lot of ways. I know this has a chronograph and is ceramic, but still...lol. For example, Grand Seiko hands are definitely better made, as are the indices on my GS SBGE275. To be fair though, GS is a weird amount of horological punch for the dollar and nothing Swiss in general stacks up to them when comparing similarly priced watches.

Chronograph! The other watches don’t have one. This does, and it’s 10x more fun because you can see the column wheel on the dial side. LVMH owns both Zenith and Hublot, so it’s no surprise the chrono here is great. Smooth to operate, not overly jumpy, etc.

Overall, I’m very happy with this as a daily. Hublot did a good job of something that beats competitors in the same range (used) and higher because the watch works so well as a package. Differentiated design, architecture that plays to strengths of the watch, a great movement, and a gorgeous ceramic bracelet to top things off.

I also considered the smaller 40mm version without the chronograph but I like chronographs a lot and the time only version is, imo, has an ugly movement because there’s a giant chunk of plain metal in the middle.

Finally, I buy all of my watches used. I paid way, way, way less than MSRP for this watch and it’s basically brand new. I would not feel like I got nearly as much bang for buck if I bought new lol :) Although, I feel that way about most watches.

Side note - the warranty thing is SUPER cool. You download the app and scan your watch, then you’re done. It worked well with this one and the titanium variant I had. IMO every brand should do this since it basically makes the watches impossible to fake (?). Shocked Hublot hasn’t licensed out the tech. Seems like it would do a lot of net good for an industry plagued with fakes???

This watch is super hard to photograph, I think video does it way more justice: https://www.instagram.com/p/C3S0-OyRuQx/





WatchEater666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 04:33 PM   #2
John Doyle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 745
Stunning watch - huge congrats! Much prefer it to ceramic APs for instance
John Doyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.