ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Psilonaught · 4 September 2009, 01:03 AM

ok i have to admit it was an impulse purshase as it was mint, and I mean mint, and the black roman numeral dial looks fantastic, but compared to my speedmaster broadarrow it looks like a girl's watch

I'm not sure I can live with it and may have to sell it after only one day - I think the main problem is that it's on a leather strap, I'm wondering if the oyster bracelet would balance it up a bit and make it look less like a children's watch?

kcmo · 4 September 2009, 01:15 AM

How about a wrist shot?

Psilonaught · 4 September 2009, 01:21 AM

i'll post a shot later

Dan Pierce · 4 September 2009, 01:24 AM

Don't be too hasty. Embrace the diversity of the size difference. Might turn out to be a nice change of pace to wear a smaller, lighter watch. Just got my DJ back from my wife and must say I'm thrilled to get it back.

dP

Timber Loftis · 4 September 2009, 01:34 AM

These watches live a life measured in decades and centuries. Styles will change. The flava-flave trend for huge watches will not last forever.

Gerardus · 4 September 2009, 03:01 AM

I agree, the big, bigger, biggest size, it is all a trend.
I friend of mine he went recently from a Breitling Crosswind back to the new model SS Datejust.
His reaction: it wears great!

bodybump · 4 September 2009, 03:05 AM

cant wait for the pics!!

Mrdi · 4 September 2009, 03:18 AM

If you can read it, it is the correct size.

PHPuser · 4 September 2009, 03:27 AM

I rather enjoy smaller but then my wrist is small compared to my hands. I had to go to a strap because it was difficult getting a bracelet over my hand. Course then you could always go for this instead.

JJ Irani · 4 September 2009, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psilonaught

ok i have to admit it was an impulse purshase as it was mint, and I mean mint, and the black roman numeral dial looks fantastic, but compared to my speedmaster broadarrow it looks like a girl's watch

I'm not sure I can live with it and may have to sell it after only one day - I think the main problem is that it's on a leather strap, I'm wondering if the oyster bracelet would balance it up a bit and make it look less like a children's watch?

Can't say I blame you, buddy. I dislike those smaller sizes.

I love the Jubilee bracelet so much but can't seem to find a 40 mm watch to fit it. One reason why I don't buy the 36 mm DJ.......just too small for my wrist.

JJ

Engi · 4 September 2009, 05:30 AM

If I were you, I would sell it; when you are used to larger watches, it's quite difficult to come back to smaller sizes ...

Ciao

Engi

Psilonaught · 4 September 2009, 06:40 AM

here is a photo of it - it's really stunning and the condition is superb, all for £720.

What I really want is one identical to this but larger. I know there is the new perpetual DJ which has the same dial but it has more shiny edges and is less classic and quite blingy

Are there any generations of rolexs like this but larger?

Nicko · 4 September 2009, 06:42 AM

The bigger the better, I really dislike the smaller ones. Anything smaller than a Sub I don't want.

Timber Loftis · 4 September 2009, 06:45 AM

Frankly, it looks awesome in my opinion.

td1500 · 4 September 2009, 06:53 AM

those overized modern watches are far too in your face and i find them really garish.
think in years to come when you are older, these classic designs are timeless.
that is a great watch and for the money an absolute steal.

DRAWTOOL · 4 September 2009, 06:57 AM

That watch looks superb on your wrist, I do think I would prefer an Oyster bracelet.

acce1999 · 4 September 2009, 06:57 AM

It looks great! And it do not look tiny on your wrist. Enjoy it for a while.

Best,

A

sushisummo · 4 September 2009, 06:58 AM

It looks great but I do understand your concern. When I wear my DJ 36mm it looks small.
I personally will never buy a watch that is below 40mm anymore.

Dan Pierce · 4 September 2009, 06:59 AM

Great example.

Size looks fine to me.

dP

Black Bay Dan · 4 September 2009, 07:00 AM

Gorgeous watch. As already said shell out £300 and put an Oyster bracelet on it.

Dan

kwood · 4 September 2009, 07:17 AM

Looks great. I do prefer the oyster bracelet myself, though. Remember, the Datejust is for a gentleman, and a gentleman's watch is not supposed to be ostentatious and attract attention. A Datejust is not supposed to stand out like an alarm clock and a Datejust is not a sports watch requiring extra size for extra visibility. Presidents, Popes, and dignitaries have gotten by without the need for extra large watches.

Perdu · 4 September 2009, 07:42 AM

That looks the right size on your wrist.

shandy · 4 September 2009, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psilonaught

here is a photo of it - it's really stunning and the condition is superb, all for £720.

What I really want is one identical to this but larger. I know there is the new perpetual DJ which has the same dial but it has more shiny edges and is less classic and quite blingy

Are there any generations of rolexs like this but larger?

That looks the perfect size for your wrist! It is a beautiful watch, I would say a keeper

One trick that was told me by my AD, whilst wearing your watch look at it in a mirror, you will get a much better, truer idea of what the watch looks like on the wrist then.
I have several vinatge watches that are about the same size as yours and they are wonderful to wear, in fact way more comfortable than my bigger watches. I too think that the trend toward bigger is a phase but I do think it will settle down to something around the 40mm mark.

I am glad so many like the new DJ11 but for me each time I see it it just does not work for me, the 36mm is perfect!

shandy · 4 September 2009, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwood

Looks great. I do prefer the oyster bracelet myself, though. Remember, the Datejust is for a gentleman, and a gentleman's watch is not supposed to be ostentatious and attract attention. A Datejust is not supposed to stand out like an alarm clock and a Datejust is not a sports watch requiring extra size for extra visibility. Presidents, Popes, and dignitaries have gotten by without the need for extra large watches.

I really could not have put it better sir

Psilonaught · 4 September 2009, 07:47 AM

thanks for the feedback. I have to say photos are deceiving it does look a lot smaller on the wrist in reality but it is stunning isn't it!

So is there any other later model with the same basic shape and dial that is available in a bigger size?

pz93c · 4 September 2009, 08:27 AM

Whatever the model number is for the plain bezel steel DJ will get you to 36mm.

I think it looks great.

tomc1944 · 4 September 2009, 08:52 AM

That is a truely stunning watch and looks great on your wrist!!!!

greekbum · 4 September 2009, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psilonaught

ok i have to admit it was an impulse purshase as it was mint, and I mean mint, and the black roman numeral dial looks fantastic, but compared to my speedmaster broadarrow it looks like a girl's watch

I'm not sure I can live with it and may have to sell it after only one day - I think the main problem is that it's on a leather strap, I'm wondering if the oyster bracelet would balance it up a bit and make it look less like a children's watch?

If YOU dont like it or think its small SELL it and get what you like.It looks good but its your watch so you make the call.

dweller · 4 September 2009, 10:14 AM

I agree with everyone else, looks great on your wrist, but if you cant overcome the size shock sell it. Personally I would give it a few days of wear though...

Blue Lantern · 4 September 2009, 11:47 AM

Looks great! But if you don't see exactly what you want to see on your wrist, I say flip it and keep looking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psilonaught

here is a photo of it - it's really stunning and the condition is superb, all for £720.

What I really want is one identical to this but larger. I know there is the new perpetual DJ which has the same dial but it has more shiny edges and is less classic and quite blingy

Are there any generations of rolexs like this but larger?

4 September 2009, 01:03 AM	#1
Psilonaught Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: london Posts: 16	Oyster Precision arrived today and it's TINY!? ok i have to admit it was an impulse purshase as it was mint, and I mean mint, and the black roman numeral dial looks fantastic, but compared to my speedmaster broadarrow it looks like a girl's watch I'm not sure I can live with it and may have to sell it after only one day - I think the main problem is that it's on a leather strap, I'm wondering if the oyster bracelet would balance it up a bit and make it look less like a children's watch?

4 September 2009, 01:24 AM	#4
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	Don't be too hasty. Embrace the diversity of the size difference. Might turn out to be a nice change of pace to wear a smaller, lighter watch. Just got my DJ back from my wife and must say I'm thrilled to get it back. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

4 September 2009, 03:01 AM	#6
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,147	I agree, the big, bigger, biggest size, it is all a trend. I friend of mine he went recently from a Breitling Crosswind back to the new model SS Datejust. His reaction: it wears great! __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

4 September 2009, 03:05 AM	#7
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	cant wait for the pics!! __________________

4 September 2009, 06:40 AM	#12
Psilonaught Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: london Posts: 16	here is a photo of it - it's really stunning and the condition is superb, all for £720. What I really want is one identical to this but larger. I know there is the new perpetual DJ which has the same dial but it has more shiny edges and is less classic and quite blingy Are there any generations of rolexs like this but larger? Attached Images

4 September 2009, 01:15 AM	#2
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	How about a wrist shot?

4 September 2009, 01:21 AM	#3
Psilonaught Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: london Posts: 16	i'll post a shot later

4 September 2009, 01:34 AM	#5
Timber Loftis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Jon Location: Chicago Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z Posts: 2,857	These watches live a life measured in decades and centuries. Styles will change. The flava-flave trend for huge watches will not last forever.

4 September 2009, 03:18 AM	#8
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	If you can read it, it is the correct size.

4 September 2009, 03:27 AM	#9
PHPuser Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: John Location: River City Ky Watch: none anymore Posts: 249	I rather enjoy smaller but then my wrist is small compared to my hands. I had to go to a strap because it was difficult getting a bracelet over my hand. Course then you could always go for this instead.

4 September 2009, 05:30 AM	#11
Engi "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Everywhere Posts: 1,434	If I were you, I would sell it; when you are used to larger watches, it's quite difficult to come back to smaller sizes ... Ciao Engi

4 September 2009, 06:42 AM	#13
Nicko Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Not here anymore Posts: 4,787	The bigger the better, I really dislike the smaller ones. Anything smaller than a Sub I don't want.

4 September 2009, 06:45 AM	#14
Timber Loftis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Jon Location: Chicago Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z Posts: 2,857	Frankly, it looks awesome in my opinion.

4 September 2009, 06:53 AM	#15
td1500 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: UK Posts: 95	those overized modern watches are far too in your face and i find them really garish. think in years to come when you are older, these classic designs are timeless. that is a great watch and for the money an absolute steal.

4 September 2009, 06:57 AM	#16
DRAWTOOL "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill Location: Olden Texas Watch: 14060M & 16570 Posts: 1,941	That watch looks superb on your wrist, I do think I would prefer an Oyster bracelet.

4 September 2009, 06:57 AM	#17
acce1999 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: GMT+1 Posts: 2,711	It looks great! And it do not look tiny on your wrist. Enjoy it for a while. Best, A

4 September 2009, 06:58 AM	#18
sushisummo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: JT Location: in a house....:) Watch: Hmmm......? Posts: 1,776	It looks great but I do understand your concern. When I wear my DJ 36mm it looks small. I personally will never buy a watch that is below 40mm anymore. __________________ Collections: -- R-O-L-E-X --AP-ROO -- P-A-N-E-R-A-I -- B-R-E-G-U-E-T -- I-W-C -- B-A-L-L -- O-T-H-E-R-S WISHLIST: Too many to list...... Member #23367

4 September 2009, 06:59 AM	#19
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	Great example. Size looks fine to me. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

4 September 2009, 07:00 AM	#20
Black Bay Dan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Dan Location: Chichester Watch: Tudor Black Bay Posts: 1,600	Gorgeous watch. As already said shell out £300 and put an Oyster bracelet on it. Dan __________________ Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79220R (2015) Tudor Black Bay GMT 79830RB (2022) Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight 79030B (2023)

4 September 2009, 07:17 AM	#21
kwood "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Kevin Location: Midland, TX Watch: DateJust Posts: 98	Looks great. I do prefer the oyster bracelet myself, though. Remember, the Datejust is for a gentleman, and a gentleman's watch is not supposed to be ostentatious and attract attention. A Datejust is not supposed to stand out like an alarm clock and a Datejust is not a sports watch requiring extra size for extra visibility. Presidents, Popes, and dignitaries have gotten by without the need for extra large watches.

4 September 2009, 07:42 AM	#22
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	That looks the right size on your wrist. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

4 September 2009, 07:47 AM	#25
Psilonaught Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: london Posts: 16	thanks for the feedback. I have to say photos are deceiving it does look a lot smaller on the wrist in reality but it is stunning isn't it! So is there any other later model with the same basic shape and dial that is available in a bigger size?

4 September 2009, 08:27 AM	#26
pz93c "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: Republic of Texas Posts: 2,776	Whatever the model number is for the plain bezel steel DJ will get you to 36mm. I think it looks great.

4 September 2009, 08:52 AM	#27
tomc1944 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: Sun City, Florida Watch: DSSD Deepsea Posts: 89	That is a truely stunning watch and looks great on your wrist!!!! __________________ Rolex 1011 Oyster Perpetual Rolex DSSD Rolex Airking Christopher Ward C4

4 September 2009, 10:14 AM	#29
dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: usa Posts: 249	I agree with everyone else, looks great on your wrist, but if you cant overcome the size shock sell it. Personally I would give it a few days of wear though...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)