The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 November 2024, 04:58 AM   #1
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
6426: Case shape is interesting...

I'm looking at 6426's and other Oyster's and came across this one. Not necessarily considering it, but the price is cheap ($1.8K). One thing that stood out immediately is how thick the lugs are. They seem too wide and misshaped...and the case seems like it's in far too good of condition.

It looks abnormal compared to my 34mm cased Tudor Oyster and all other 6426's that I've seen.

Am I making sense or completely off?


studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 05:19 AM   #2
TimeToGo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
.
I think the watch is fine. The issue may be the bracelet. Possibly a 17mm bracelet or the largest links to the case removed w/19mm ends..
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 05:31 AM   #3
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
Looks normal to me.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 05:33 AM   #4
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToGo View Post
.
I think the watch is fine. The issue may be the bracelet. Possibly a 17mm bracelet or the largest links to the case removed w/19mm ends..
Ahh, perhaps that's what the issue is
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 05:42 AM   #5
TimeToGo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
Does not look right. See here and compare on the net..
.
Attached Images
 
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 09:34 AM   #6
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
Yes, the bracelet is missing its largest link
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2024, 02:19 PM   #7
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,010
6426: Case shape is interesting...

It could be missing its first link on both sides - or more probable - the bracelet isn't the original one at all - and from a different model with narrower lugs.

Looks like a 17mm bracelet to me - but the picture doesn't help since it's not showing the clasp and rear view.

Vintage Rolex watches with a 17mm lug width had folded link Oyster bracelets. Maybe from an older Oyster Precision?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2024, 01:27 AM   #8
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Thanks all, appreciate the eyes. The more that I look at these the more I realize they used a different case than the Tudor Oysters of the same era. The Rolex cases have a slightly different shape, and thicker lugs. I always assumed (wrongly) that they were the same case across the 34mm models. Interestingly, the Rolex OP's also seem to have a slightly thinner case (like the Tudors) than the manual wound Oysters like the 6426.



The 6426 above has thicker lugs than the OP and Tudor below suggesting a different case design.



studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 12:44 PM   #9
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
For anyone who has been hands on with both an Air King and a 6426/7, can you please describe how the case shape differs between the two? I kind of like the the slightly thicker case of the 6426/7’s.
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 05:04 PM   #10
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
there are various case shapes, particularly the Tudor models; from very slim to chunky for the automatic models. My 7909 is particularly thick.
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 11:49 PM   #11
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
We are also talking about watches from 80 years ago. A lot of the examples have been heavily polished and with the current trend of laser welding lugs, who knows what is correct and what isnt anymore. Scrupulous sellers may build lugs back up bigger than they are supposed to be in order to appeal to buyers who own current models, who are used to larger lugs.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 12:19 AM   #12
TimeToGo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
Here is side view.
.
Attached Images
 
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 01:19 AM   #13
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
We are also talking about watches from 80 years ago. A lot of the examples have been heavily polished and with the current trend of laser welding lugs, who knows what is correct and what isnt anymore. Scrupulous sellers may build lugs back up bigger than they are supposed to be in order to appeal to buyers who own current models, who are used to larger lugs.
I totally understand that. But I do believe Rolex sourced different cases for their manual wind (I.e. 6426) model(s) than the Perpetual models. When I look at the 1002, 1003, 1005, and 5500 references they all appear to be differently shaped than the 6426 and 6694–which look thicker and have a different side profile.
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 01:20 AM   #14
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToGo View Post
Here is side view.
.
This is really helpful. I’m guessing the bottom watch is either a 6426 or 6694?
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 01:29 AM   #15
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
We are also talking about watches from 80 years ago. A lot of the examples have been heavily polished and with the current trend of laser welding lugs, who knows what is correct and what isnt anymore. Scrupulous sellers may build lugs back up bigger than they are supposed to be in order to appeal to buyers who own current models, who are used to larger lugs.
Many are absolutely polished, but I don't know how many of these 34mm OPs have been heavily laser welding. Obviously, it's possible, but the cost of that type of laser welding, to actually build up the mass of lugs, is pretty high for a watch in this price range. Most sellers probably just want to move these lower-end pieces on without investing in them.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 01:58 AM   #16
TimeToGo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by studioal View Post
This is really helpful. I’m guessing the bottom watch is either a 6426 or 6694?
6426 on top !
Air king on the bottom.
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 02:12 AM   #17
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToGo View Post
6426 on top !
Air king on the bottom.
Well, that's interesting. I humbly concede that I don't know enough about these yet.
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 02:42 AM   #18
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
The lugs on that Air King look to be polished down to a nub. So close to the pin hole
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2024, 03:35 AM   #19
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
The lugs on that Air King look to be polished down to a nub. So close to the pin hole
We'll try another then. I do see a difference. I was thinking that perhaps the 6426 used a Spillman case like some early Rolex and Tudor Oyster Prince's given they are slightly thicker around the lugs than the Air Kings / OP's. But I'm not seeing any CRS hallmarks on the casebacks of either. Not claiming anything, just thinking that it's possible.



studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2024, 10:48 AM   #20
perry911113
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albany
Watch: 1970 Air King 5500
Posts: 53
There is no question the shapes of Oysters within 34 mm are different.
Your 6426 case is much like the of my 6494 with thicker lugs. The case back is flatter as well which makes the watch sit lower on my wrist in comparison to my 5500 and my 15010.

I also can say my Tudor 7904 has thicker lugs than both my 7909 and my 7965. However the 7905 has extended lugs and it make the 34mm 7965 look more like a 36mm.

This is great discussion for 34mm Rolex and Tudor collectors.
Attached Images
           
perry911113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2024, 05:11 PM   #21
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
Side view of my Tudor 7909 from late 50s
Attached Images
 
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2024, 05:12 PM   #22
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by perry911113 View Post
There is no question the shapes of Oysters within 34 mm are different.
Your 6426 case is much like the of my 6494 with thicker lugs. The case back is flatter as well which makes the watch sit lower on my wrist in comparison to my 5500 and my 15010.

I also can say my Tudor 7904 has thicker lugs than both my 7909 and my 7965. However the 7905 has extended lugs and it make the 34mm 7965 look more like a 36mm.

This is great discussion for 34mm Rolex and Tudor collectors.
Lovely collection.
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2024, 11:20 PM   #23
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
The larger 6424 has a very similar shape, with the wider lugs.
Attached Images
 
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2024, 12:47 AM   #24
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
You also have to keep in mind that these watches are over 80 years old and a lot of them are heavily polished. You can find original catalogs and youll be able to see how far the lugs protrude past the end link. It will give you an idea of how long they should be and also how thick the lugs are. Another area to check is at the 3 O-clock position and the 9 O-clock position on the case. Material from the case should be wider than the bezel. If the case is flush with the bezel then the case is over polished. But, thats saying that the bezel on the watch is the correct bezel. So many parts on these old watches have been replaced with those from other watches as well as aftermarket.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2024, 07:57 AM   #25
studioal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by perry911113 View Post
There is no question the shapes of Oysters within 34 mm are different.
Your 6426 case is much like the of my 6494 with thicker lugs. The case back is flatter as well which makes the watch sit lower on my wrist in comparison to my 5500 and my 15010.

I also can say my Tudor 7904 has thicker lugs than both my 7909 and my 7965. However the 7905 has extended lugs and it make the 34mm 7965 look more like a 36mm.

This is great discussion for 34mm Rolex and Tudor collectors.
Thank you for sharing your observations and visuals. So helpful.

I took a side by side of my 6426 (thanks to Norman) and my 9050/0. Very different case shape. The Tudor clearly has stubbier lugs which makes the lug to lug length quite a bit shorter. I would have that Tudor would have used Rolex cases like they with the Subs. Apparently not. Worth noting: my Tudor has the Spillman C.R.S. hallmark.




Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
You also have to keep in mind that these watches are over 80 years old and a lot of them are heavily polished. You can find original catalogs and youll be able to see how far the lugs protrude past the end link. It will give you an idea of how long they should be and also how thick the lugs are. Another area to check is at the 3 O-clock position and the 9 O-clock position on the case. Material from the case should be wider than the bezel. If the case is flush with the bezel then the case is over polished. But, thats saying that the bezel on the watch is the correct bezel. So many parts on these old watches have been replaced with those from other watches as well as aftermarket.
Something to consider for sure, but they are definitely different cases between the 6426, and the other 34mm offerings from Rolex and Tudor of that era. It's interesting. Good point about the mid case extending beyond the bezel...assuming the bezel is OEM.
studioal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2024, 05:17 AM   #26
perry911113
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albany
Watch: 1970 Air King 5500
Posts: 53
The difference in cases defines underlying beauty within each model Oyster watch.

Here shows the low sleekness of the Tudor 7965.

A watch I find to be a must in any collection. A 34mm that looks like a 36mm.
Attached Images
   
perry911113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.