ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 November 2024, 04:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
6426: Case shape is interesting...
I'm looking at 6426's and other Oyster's and came across this one. Not necessarily considering it, but the price is cheap ($1.8K). One thing that stood out immediately is how thick the lugs are. They seem too wide and misshaped...and the case seems like it's in far too good of condition.
It looks abnormal compared to my 34mm cased Tudor Oyster and all other 6426's that I've seen. Am I making sense or completely off? |
26 November 2024, 05:19 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
|
.
I think the watch is fine. The issue may be the bracelet. Possibly a 17mm bracelet or the largest links to the case removed w/19mm ends.. |
26 November 2024, 05:31 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
|
Looks normal to me.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
26 November 2024, 05:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
|
26 November 2024, 05:42 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
|
Does not look right. See here and compare on the net..
. |
26 November 2024, 09:34 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
Yes, the bracelet is missing its largest link
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
26 November 2024, 02:19 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,010
|
6426: Case shape is interesting...
It could be missing its first link on both sides - or more probable - the bracelet isn't the original one at all - and from a different model with narrower lugs.
Looks like a 17mm bracelet to me - but the picture doesn't help since it's not showing the clasp and rear view. Vintage Rolex watches with a 17mm lug width had folded link Oyster bracelets. Maybe from an older Oyster Precision? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
27 November 2024, 01:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
Thanks all, appreciate the eyes. The more that I look at these the more I realize they used a different case than the Tudor Oysters of the same era. The Rolex cases have a slightly different shape, and thicker lugs. I always assumed (wrongly) that they were the same case across the 34mm models. Interestingly, the Rolex OP's also seem to have a slightly thinner case (like the Tudors) than the manual wound Oysters like the 6426.
The 6426 above has thicker lugs than the OP and Tudor below suggesting a different case design. |
2 December 2024, 12:44 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
For anyone who has been hands on with both an Air King and a 6426/7, can you please describe how the case shape differs between the two? I kind of like the the slightly thicker case of the 6426/7’s.
|
2 December 2024, 05:04 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
there are various case shapes, particularly the Tudor models; from very slim to chunky for the automatic models. My 7909 is particularly thick.
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
2 December 2024, 11:49 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
We are also talking about watches from 80 years ago. A lot of the examples have been heavily polished and with the current trend of laser welding lugs, who knows what is correct and what isnt anymore. Scrupulous sellers may build lugs back up bigger than they are supposed to be in order to appeal to buyers who own current models, who are used to larger lugs.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
3 December 2024, 12:19 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
|
Here is side view.
. |
3 December 2024, 01:19 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
|
|
3 December 2024, 01:20 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
|
3 December 2024, 01:29 AM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
|
Quote:
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
3 December 2024, 01:58 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,734
|
|
3 December 2024, 02:12 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
|
3 December 2024, 02:42 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
The lugs on that Air King look to be polished down to a nub. So close to the pin hole
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
3 December 2024, 03:35 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
|
|
5 December 2024, 10:48 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albany
Watch: 1970 Air King 5500
Posts: 53
|
There is no question the shapes of Oysters within 34 mm are different.
Your 6426 case is much like the of my 6494 with thicker lugs. The case back is flatter as well which makes the watch sit lower on my wrist in comparison to my 5500 and my 15010. I also can say my Tudor 7904 has thicker lugs than both my 7909 and my 7965. However the 7905 has extended lugs and it make the 34mm 7965 look more like a 36mm. This is great discussion for 34mm Rolex and Tudor collectors. |
5 December 2024, 05:11 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
Side view of my Tudor 7909 from late 50s
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
5 December 2024, 05:12 PM | #22 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
Quote:
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
|
5 December 2024, 11:20 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,286
|
The larger 6424 has a very similar shape, with the wider lugs.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
6 December 2024, 12:47 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
You also have to keep in mind that these watches are over 80 years old and a lot of them are heavily polished. You can find original catalogs and youll be able to see how far the lugs protrude past the end link. It will give you an idea of how long they should be and also how thick the lugs are. Another area to check is at the 3 O-clock position and the 9 O-clock position on the case. Material from the case should be wider than the bezel. If the case is flush with the bezel then the case is over polished. But, thats saying that the bezel on the watch is the correct bezel. So many parts on these old watches have been replaced with those from other watches as well as aftermarket.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
6 December 2024, 07:57 AM | #25 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
I took a side by side of my 6426 (thanks to Norman) and my 9050/0. Very different case shape. The Tudor clearly has stubbier lugs which makes the lug to lug length quite a bit shorter. I would have that Tudor would have used Rolex cases like they with the Subs. Apparently not. Worth noting: my Tudor has the Spillman C.R.S. hallmark. Quote:
|
||
8 December 2024, 05:17 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albany
Watch: 1970 Air King 5500
Posts: 53
|
The difference in cases defines underlying beauty within each model Oyster watch.
Here shows the low sleekness of the Tudor 7965. A watch I find to be a must in any collection. A 34mm that looks like a 36mm. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.