ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 July 2009, 01:35 AM | #121 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Ian
Location: canada
Posts: 1,724
|
Debates like this always tickle me, all the talk about man sized having to be bigger, what watch to where with what cloths as it may be deemed incorrect to wear one thing with another.
Luckily some of us do not subscribe to the corperate success ladder mentality or old fashioned values that judge a person on what they wear as to be an indicator as to who they are! I grew up in a highly conservative, big C and little c family where such things were debated frequently as a way to gaining success, I was told from a young age that my appearence and attire would be one of the deciding fatcors in how succesfull I would be in the world. I bought into that for years, had an ulcer, got depression and basically led my life for others approval and where did it get me, deeper into that mire! Funny thing is now I do not give a $h*% about what people think of me! I am happy knowing I am an OK sort of person who does no harm to people. My watch wearing habits changed along with that and now I wear dress watches with jeans if I feel inclined and sports watches with smarter wear. If I like wearing it then that is all that matters! What anyone else percives me to be based on what I am wearing at the time will be a sure way to get me walking away very quickly from them as as a rule I know they have little or no ability to think anywhere near outside the box and thus will be very generic and usually very boring people! James mate, where what you like with what ever you want to wear it with and have fun in doing so, life is way too short to care a flying F$%K what anyone thinks of you when you do. Real people base their opinions of you By your actions and good deeds not what you wear! There, that is my rant of the day! Now, I think I will put on my nice leather strapped 34mm gold vintage Omega and walk outside in on this beautiful day with my shorts and Tatty old Tshirt! |
17 July 2009, 01:44 AM | #122 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
17 July 2009, 02:23 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: KL
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer II Black
Posts: 1,480
|
Will have to see the new sized DJ in the 'flesh' to know how it looks - the bezel/dial/bracelet proportions can be tough to get right. Plus how does it fit on a (your) wrist.
I think that among the 'major' brands Rolex has been the most resistant to joining in the BIG watch trend (fad?). Not all of these size trends last, and for me, one attraction of Rolex has been that it stands apart from the 'bigger is better' crowd.
__________________
Explorer II 1655; Day Date 1803; Submariner 14060; Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660; 5-Digit Datejusts; Perpetual Date 1500 and 15000; Pelagos FXD M25707B; Omega Dynamic 'Targa Florio' 5291.51.07; 'Good Planet' GMT 232.30.44.22.03.001; Planet Ocean 215.30.40.20.03.002; Zenith Chronomaster Original 03.3200.3600/22.M3200. |
22 July 2009, 09:20 AM | #124 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Texas
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 2,352
|
Hey James,
I gotta contact you... send me a PM... I want to know if you can contact me with your AD and get 15% off as well. |
22 July 2009, 09:24 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
is the DJ2 out yet? what about the Sub-C TT?
|
22 July 2009, 11:50 AM | #126 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 69
|
I really like it, but would not wear it with a suit due to that bezel. It reminds me more of a sport watch to be honest. They should have saved the large bezels for sport watches imho. But the real test will be how it looks on my wrist; 36mm has always been too small for my wrist, but I do see the need to continue producing them for many men on this earth. Not all of us are 250lb Americans.
|
22 July 2009, 11:53 AM | #127 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: 1655 EXP
Posts: 36,337
|
|
22 July 2009, 11:57 AM | #128 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: *******
Posts: 233
|
|
22 July 2009, 12:25 PM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 162
|
It's a lovely watch, but not really my cup of tea. I prefer a sports watch to be 39-40mm or 42mm at the maximum, if the case is thin (like a speedmaster professional). For dressier watches I prefer smaller sizes. Perhaps I'm old fashioned, but I prefer the proportions of the older 36mm DJ.
__________________
♛ Rolex Submariner (14060M) | Explorer 2 White Dial (16570) | Day Date (1803) ♛ Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (15400) | Edward Piguet (15015ST) Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronometer (42042) | Overseas Chronograph (49140) JLC Master Control Hometime (Q1628420) |
22 July 2009, 12:57 PM | #130 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WI
Watch: 16233, 15200
Posts: 66
|
I like the looks of the DJII, but would never consider it a dress watch. I personally think the normal DJ is just barely a dress watch. I really don't know what I'd consider the DJII, as I don't think I'd call it a sports watch either.
And on another note, since he's been brought up a few times in the topic, let's laugh at this guy and his tiny, feminine watch. |
22 July 2009, 01:50 PM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 417
|
I think the larger size definitely says "more sporty" than the 36mm...looks like a good blend to me!
__________________
I have to be successful because I like expensive things. |
22 July 2009, 03:20 PM | #132 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
|
|
22 July 2009, 05:51 PM | #133 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 131
|
36 mm is OK for me, growth accelaration (all chemicals, hormons in the food) has not gone so fast everywhere.
By the way, the more I try and look new rolexes the more I like my Exp, new DJ looks a bit blocky and too shiny, the bezel is more prominent and I seem to like more subtle ones. I am planning to get one but have doubts. Maybe I am a one-watch guy. |
23 July 2009, 03:23 AM | #134 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
I have only seen and tried on the DayDate II, but I like the size and fit of it.
Personally, if I ever get a Datejust II, it won't be until they offer it on jubilee. I think the options are too limited at the moment relative to the wealth of options available with the regular Datejust. |
25 July 2009, 01:57 AM | #135 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
I fear that is the sound heard round the world as your statement flew over the heads of many. |
|
25 July 2009, 02:01 AM | #136 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
Exactly, it would be hard to put a 20k watch in the same drawer with the bell bottoms, thin ties and parachute pants. If the DJ is anything like the DDII it will make me throw up in my mouth. I actually laughed out loud when I tried on the DDII. It looked like a clown costume accessory. |
|
25 July 2009, 03:27 AM | #137 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
too big for "dress"
36 mm is still the more appropriate business/dress style, for my taste. Unless you've got eyesight problems, I don't see a reason to get bigger.
|
30 July 2009, 12:31 AM | #138 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: NH
Watch: Pam 312 & DJ II
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------ PAM 312, DJ II |
|
16 September 2009, 04:03 PM | #139 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 26
|
James,
That is the best looking DJ2 I have seen. It just needs the Jubilee. |
16 September 2009, 11:02 PM | #140 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 460
|
Have the DJ & DJ II.
I love them both but unless you are large guy with large wrists the DJ II is not a true dress watch... If you wear European shirts the cuffs can be a bit too tight for the DJ II (again this is for smaller wrists) I would say the DJ II best fills the role of a daily wear watch for someone who is not a suit or button down and tie guy. That is just my two cents based on experience being smaller (6.8 in wrist and wearing quite a bit of European designers when it comes to my suit) |
17 September 2009, 12:16 AM | #141 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 69
|
Looks like half the forum wants it (the other half hates it) but nobody buys it. It's been up for sale here in the forum (blue with roman) for 4 days now.
|
17 September 2009, 12:56 AM | #142 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
I do not like the new DJ2.
A dresswatch that is bigger then an EX2 or SUB etc.wich are furthermore toolwatches??? Horrible development imho! Maybe i am oldschool....
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
18 September 2009, 05:50 AM | #143 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1
|
Hi all,
My first post on this forum so please excuse any ignorance. Am just about to buy my first ever Rolex and am torn between a Sub and a DateJust - however the latter does look a little small on my wrist and I was excited to learn about the new 2009 DJII. Does anybody know if this has been released in the UK yet (in particular the steel and white gold style shown in the first picture in this thread)? Thanks |
5 October 2009, 10:21 AM | #144 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: John
Location: arkansas
Watch: 114060, IWC
Posts: 562
|
I only wish they had gone with the brushed bracelet. Not a big fan of the brushed/polished as a casual bracelet
|
5 October 2009, 10:28 AM | #145 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Get it - wear it - enjoy it
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
5 October 2009, 10:28 AM | #146 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
Too big for a dress watch. This is a fine sport model, but SS and 40mm+ is not a dress watch.
Nice watch, though. |
5 October 2009, 11:00 AM | #147 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: 116234
Posts: 4,150
|
I LOVE it and will be buying one as soon as possible!!
|
5 October 2009, 11:53 AM | #148 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
|
I don't like the DJ II. I saw nothing wrong with the size of the DJ! Perhaps it'll grow on me; I don't know. The proportions seem all "fun house mirror."
|
5 October 2009, 12:32 PM | #149 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 459
|
I disagree I think the Date Just II was needed, I am 6'0" tall and would never were the tiny 36mm DJ it's just too small. looks like a kids watch or woman watch. It's been a long time coming and I think Rolex finally realized that they need to make a bigger dress watch. look at Panerai Nice biggger and dressy. big watches are in style now and Rolex knows it
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.