ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jcatral14 · 15 November 2009, 09:35 AM

So, I've had my 88 for a few months now and hanging around this place has made me realize that having just one PAM will not cut it

I'm already drawing up plans for the next "one".

I've been scoping out different PAMs. My requirements for my next one are, exhibition case back, GMT, automatic, in-house movement. I can be flexible on one or two of those but the more requirements met, the better. So far, I've identified the following as probables: 005, 190, 312, 320, 328, 233, 270.

As I've blown this year's budget and next year's as well, I'm going to have to be a bit crafty getting this acquisition past the CEO. Esp the 190, 233 and 270

I think planning world domination is easier....

NavitimerNut · 15 November 2009, 09:56 AM

312 would be the cheapest that would fit in all of your requirements

dalip · 15 November 2009, 10:20 AM

great to hear

good luck

mike · 15 November 2009, 10:49 AM

For me if $$$ were no object the 270 wins.

jcatral14 · 15 November 2009, 11:04 AM

I think I should add the 305 and 321 to that list. Is there a submersible with a GMT function?

Quote:

Originally Posted by NavitimerNut

312 would be the cheapest that would fit in all of your requirements

It's a very nice piece worthy of being the second PAM in my collection. I don't think it has a GMT function though. I meant to put 321 instead of the 328. Bedsides GMT it also has a power reserve meter

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalip

great to hear

good luck

Hahaha. Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

For me if $$$ were no object the 270 wins.

Aye, there's the rub. Too much $$$ but what a gorgeous piece

If there was but one PAM to own, that would be it for me

Trurolexer · 15 November 2009, 02:35 PM

Whatever you choose, those are GREAT!!! Good luck for finding one.

ocwatching · 15 November 2009, 04:33 PM

233 or 270 for the nice GMT...

Nica64 · 16 November 2009, 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

Whatever you choose, those are GREAT!!! Good luck for finding one.

X2

B. Doggy · 16 November 2009, 03:12 AM

The 190 is phenomenal!

15 November 2009, 09:35 AM	#1
jcatral14 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Jay Location: NJ Watch: aholic Posts: 726	Jonesing for my next PAM... So, I've had my 88 for a few months now and hanging around this place has made me realize that having just one PAM will not cut it I'm already drawing up plans for the next "one". I've been scoping out different PAMs. My requirements for my next one are, exhibition case back, GMT, automatic, in-house movement. I can be flexible on one or two of those but the more requirements met, the better. So far, I've identified the following as probables: 005, 190, 312, 320, 328, 233, 270. As I've blown this year's budget and next year's as well, I'm going to have to be a bit crafty getting this acquisition past the CEO. Esp the 190, 233 and 270 I think planning world domination is easier.... __________________ -Jay

15 November 2009, 10:20 AM	#3
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	great to hear good luck __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

15 November 2009, 04:33 PM	#7
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	233 or 270 for the nice GMT... __________________ too much into watches...

16 November 2009, 03:12 AM	#9
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	The 190 is phenomenal! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

15 November 2009, 09:56 AM	#2
NavitimerNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Caleb Location: California Watch: Rolex 1500 Posts: 1,295	312 would be the cheapest that would fit in all of your requirements

15 November 2009, 10:49 AM	#4
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	For me if $$$ were no object the 270 wins.

15 November 2009, 02:35 PM	#6
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Whatever you choose, those are GREAT!!! Good luck for finding one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)