112 v 312 size

[A1000]

Originally Posted by Pulpdiction

the SDDS seems to have a smaller surface area on the back which is in contact with the wrist, so its sits proud with only aqbout 75% of the diameter of the watch in contact with your wrist, whereas the 312 is more like 90%, add this to the fact the the strap is 24mm on the 312 and only about 18mm, then the whole balance seemed off on my wrist and it just seemed to want to fall off to the side, which made it uncomfortable.

x2 You've possibly just managed to articulate how the SDDS felt to me when I tried it on vs the PAM 1950 cased watches. In addition the aesthetics of the bezel and dial may also have a factor as the simple bezel and face make the 312 appear smaller than its size IMHO, whereas a sports watch such as the SDDS with a contrasting bezel with numbers on it has the effect of accetuating the size.