The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 February 2010, 03:26 AM   #61
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
See, TRF photog Kyle agrees with me.

That's one of the reasons I love my bay window. Ten AM or even late afternoon on a weekend is a fun time to take some shots.

I would -as others recommended - get a Tripod and a cable or wireless release. I need to do likewise so I don't have to sift through so many shaky cam / blurry shots!
Window lighting is excellent for a lot of applications.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 03:51 AM   #62
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Most compacts are capable of excellent macro output. But like another poster said, manual focus can be wonky, if the camera has it at all. The DoF inherent to small-sensor cameras does mitigate this to a certain extent, but there's nothing like having the full manual control of an SLR and a dedicated macro lens. Still, I've had really good luck with a camera like my SD700.

Ideal? An SLR with a macro lens, a sturdy tripod and a little practice. I've also found the Liveview of my 40D to be a boon to my macro photography. It's amazing the precise level of focus you can get using it. Since manual focus is not the strength of the DSLR, it's a great feature to have.

The tripod is also critical because you will have to stop your lens down quite a bit to get a good amount of DoF, and that means slower shutter speeds. Coupled with the effects of extreme magnification inherent to close-in photography, you are going to have a tough time getting sharp shots without a pod.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 08:00 AM   #63
presario
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBat View Post
Most compacts are capable of excellent macro output. But like another poster said, manual focus can be wonky, if the camera has it at all. The DoF inherent to small-sensor cameras does mitigate this to a certain extent, but there's nothing like having the full manual control of an SLR and a dedicated macro lens. Still, I've had really good luck with a camera like my SD700.

Ideal? An SLR with a macro lens, a sturdy tripod and a little practice. I've also found the Liveview of my 40D to be a boon to my macro photography. It's amazing the precise level of focus you can get using it. Since manual focus is not the strength of the DSLR, it's a great feature to have.

The tripod is also critical because you will have to stop your lens down quite a bit to get a good amount of DoF, and that means slower shutter speeds. Coupled with the effects of extreme magnification inherent to close-in photography, you are going to have a tough time getting sharp shots without a pod.
Excellent advice, John. Put into words brilliantly.

The only thing I'd like to add is make the background interesting.

Guys, your photos are amazing. Thanks for the constant inspiration!

__________________
presario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 08:04 AM   #64
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
Nikon CoolPix's have never disappointed me.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 08:15 AM   #65
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke View Post
Nikon CoolPix's have never disappointed me.
I think we would all attest to that, Jocke.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 08:16 AM   #66
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Thanks, Andrew, and great shot.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 09:12 AM   #67
MilgaussMan
"TRF" Member
 
MilgaussMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Indiana
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBat View Post
Thanks, Andrew, and great shot.
Definitely!
__________________
116400V
14060M


"3 O'Clock Lume Club" - Charter Member
Join the group:http://www.rolexforums.com/group.php?groupid=20
MilgaussMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 09:35 AM   #68
presario
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,428
Thanks, guys!

Jocke, Nikon should hire you for their Coolpix campaigns.
__________________
presario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 09:36 AM   #69
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by presario View Post
Thanks, guys!

Jocke, Nikon should hire you for their Coolpix campaigns.
Problem is the only thing Jocke can shoot is watches.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 09:44 AM   #70
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by presario View Post
Guys, your photos are amazing.

IMHO your photo is amazing One of the best GMT IIC shots I've ever seen. Please post more.
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 01:50 AM   #71
omg
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Tommy
Location: US
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBat View Post
The tripod is also critical because you will have to stop your lens down quite a bit to get a good amount of DoF, and that means slower shutter speeds. Coupled with the effects of extreme magnification inherent to close-in photography, you are going to have a tough time getting sharp shots without a pod.
Very good information John!

Now I need a good tripod, can any one recommend one with a reasonable price?
I have Rebel T1i.

omg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 01:56 AM   #72
omg
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Tommy
Location: US
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by presario View Post
Ah! I got it, my pictures suck b/c I don't have GMT IIc

I need to get one before buying more camera gear

In the serious note, this is the best picture of GMT IIc I have ever seen.
Good job Andrew!
omg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 02:01 AM   #73
snow_rocks
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
Used a Canon Powershot 1000 for this! Didn't clean up the image since I wanted only to crop the LEC! Can you guess the shutter speed?
Attached Images
 
snow_rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 02:33 AM   #74
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by omg View Post
Very good information John!

Now I need a good tripod, can any one recommend one with a reasonable price?
I have Rebel T1i.

Hey, Tommy,

You have to define what reasonable is for you. Like most photography gear, tripods and heads can easily go up into the thousands of dollars. Carbon fiber is great, but pricey. I have a Gitzo tripod and Really Right Stuff ballhead that I love. Great setup, light, rigid and very high quality, but I paid mucho dinero for it.

If you're looking for something more economical, an aluminum pod is a great value, and they work very well. Manfrotto makes good quality stuff, and you should be able to get into one with a decent head for around $200.

If you have your heart set on carbon fiber, this company makes excellent products at a much better price than Gitzo, and by most accounts they are very good tripods:

http://www.feisol.net/tripods-standa...ds-c-1_12.html

When shopping for a pod, keep an eye on any given models max height without its center column (if it has one) extended. It can be annoying to have to stoop all the time to look through your viewfinder. Also, make sure the max weight rating of the tripod (and whatever head you choose) is higher than your heaviest lens/camera setup.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 02:35 AM   #75
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by presario View Post
Thanks, guys!

Jocke, Nikon should hire you for their Coolpix campaigns.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 03:09 AM   #76
nilomis
"TRF" Member
 
nilomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT-3
Watch: Many
Posts: 36
Depends how far you want to go

I normally use the semi-pro setup (Canon 50d, 100mm f2.8 macro, Manfroto tripod, remote shutter) but it gives less mobility.

I went shopping for a small camera and got a Canon G11. The G11 can capture pictures in RAW and this is great for adjustments.

G11 - Not bad:



I'm imagine what this camera can do after I read the manual!

Of course, the semi-pro setup offers more options (50d):






Cheers,

Nilo
nilomis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 03:18 AM   #77
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Nice shots, nilomis. A G series Canon is a good option. It gives you much of the manual control and SLR does, and IQ is very good. The only place is really lacks is speed of AF and high ISO performance. Many pros use them as portable back-ups.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 03:30 AM   #78
nilomis
"TRF" Member
 
nilomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT-3
Watch: Many
Posts: 36
Thanks,

Since I only use manual focus and low ISO, I'm at home with the G11.
The only missing point, so far, is the lack of a polarized filter. I use this filter a lot with my 100mm.

Please notice that the last two shots were made with the 50d not with the G11.

Nilo
nilomis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2010, 08:21 AM   #79
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
The quality of the lens is what makes the difference. So many times I have seen people buy top notch camera bodies and have cheaper tamron or sigma lenses.
You will need to have aperture priority as a minimum setting to control depth of field. A form of remote shutter release, a tripod and lighting, a light box will give evenly diffused light a spot light or two for harsh and or directional lighting.
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.