ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ChickoftheSea · 17 February 2010, 01:17 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-OYSTER-PER...item3caa41b969

This REEKS!!! Please, men of TRF, take out this trash!!!

meloncap78 · 17 February 2010, 01:21 PM

KAKA. It also looks like our seller could use a spelling lesson as well.

mcjp6 · 17 February 2010, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChickoftheSea

This REEKS!!! Please, men of TRF, take out this trash!!!

This nasty thing is on its way to the deep Cissy.....

tudorman8276 · 17 February 2010, 04:08 PM

idk01 · 17 February 2010, 08:31 PM

Fungus Amongus!

TimeToGo · 17 February 2010, 11:06 PM

sparrowslocker09 ( 321)

OUCH!

ChickoftheSea · 18 February 2010, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcjp6

This nasty thing is on its way to the deep Cissy.....

You guys are my heros!!

jnmarshall · 18 February 2010, 12:27 AM

Can some of you experts educate the rest of us? I took a quick look and besides it truely being "nasty" in need of a good steam bath, what makes this a fake?

ChickoftheSea · 18 February 2010, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jnmarshall

Can some of you experts educate the rest of us? I took a quick look and besides it truely being "nasty" in need of a good steam bath, what makes this a fake?

Prior to posting here, I contacted the seller and asked for the first few digits of the watch's serial number. The first response I received was "69173". With that, I replied that this was the model number, not the serial number. To that I received the question, "Where do I find the serial number?" I wrote back with the location of the SN as being 1) on the certificate or 2) on the case. I have not heard back yet as to whether or not the seller wishes to learn or disclose the serial number, if such a thing exists on this particular watch.

By posting here and showing what I believe to be a fake, I am not implying expert status. However, if I didn't have strong suspicions based on the seller's ignorance, a number of components of the listing itself, and the generally sloppy construction of the watch, I would not post. If I am wrong and can learn something from the expertise of others, I welcome the opportunity for elucidation and will gladly stand duly corrected.

jnmarshall · 18 February 2010, 01:24 AM

The 69173 might raise the question. Isn't that a two tone model or was their an SS only? This doesn't look like a two tone.

ChickoftheSea · 18 February 2010, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jnmarshall

The 69173 might raise the question. Isn't that a two tone model or was their an SS only? This doesn't look like a two tone.

Precisely! One of number of red flags!

idk01 · 18 February 2010, 07:27 AM

Took a while bit it has departed

This listing (260554471785) has been removed, or this item is not available.

The big giveaway on this little fungus is the date magnification and date font, the winding crown is set wrong and crooked meaning it aint attached to genuine Rolex movement, the grade of the steel on the case is as dull as hell compared to the genuine, and that dial where do I start :-)

tudorman8276 · 18 February 2010, 01:20 PM

17 February 2010, 01:17 PM	#1
ChickoftheSea "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: South Texas Watch: YM 168623 Posts: 241	Rolex oyster perpetual lady datejust ladies watch used - "nasty"!!! http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-OYSTER-PER...item3caa41b969 This REEKS!!! Please, men of TRF, take out this trash!!!

17 February 2010, 04:08 PM	#4
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	...good catch Cissy...time for da TIN BIN...

17 February 2010, 08:31 PM	#5
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Fungus Amongus! __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

18 February 2010, 07:27 AM	#12
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Took a while bit it has departed This listing (260554471785) has been removed, or this item is not available. The big giveaway on this little fungus is the date magnification and date font, the winding crown is set wrong and crooked meaning it aint attached to genuine Rolex movement, the grade of the steel on the case is as dull as hell compared to the genuine, and that dial where do I start :-) __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

18 February 2010, 01:20 PM	#13
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,583	...oh yes...

17 February 2010, 01:21 PM	#2
meloncap78 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Joshua Location: Syracuse, NY Watch: LV C Posts: 2,204	KAKA. It also looks like our seller could use a spelling lesson as well.

17 February 2010, 11:06 PM	#6
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	sparrowslocker09 ( 321) OUCH!

18 February 2010, 12:27 AM	#8
jnmarshall "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: DFW Posts: 364	Can some of you experts educate the rest of us? I took a quick look and besides it truely being "nasty" in need of a good steam bath, what makes this a fake?

18 February 2010, 01:24 AM	#10
jnmarshall "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: DFW Posts: 364	The 69173 might raise the question. Isn't that a two tone model or was their an SS only? This doesn't look like a two tone.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)