ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mosco · 2 March 2010, 01:43 PM

what is this thing.... Yuck....

http://cgi.ebay.com/Hublot-Big-Bang-...item2eab7872dd

He even dared to take the back off

1000ftSub · 2 March 2010, 01:46 PM

The movement just looks bad!

Earl Camembert · 2 March 2010, 03:20 PM

I don't know how people that deal not only in different models of a brand but different brands can possibly know every nuance that could have been.

I would not consider this watch not because I know anything about it but because the pictures are blurry and the seller has been around two months with a 7 feed back; he never sold a watch, the biggest thing was software. I wonder if it was legitimate?

ParisDakarBmw · 2 March 2010, 03:51 PM

That watch doesn't have any luster that the real ones have. I would say it's a fake, and then the small feedback. I'd stay away.

BASSETHOUNDS · 2 March 2010, 06:05 PM

Look at that chinese POS that they want us to believe to be a Hublot movement ..

crazyfingers · 2 March 2010, 06:29 PM

"I have put the starting price lower, because the watch is not new, and I wanted many people to participate. I am convinced that everyone will appreciate the beauty and quality of this watch, well known worldwide. "

What a thoughtful chap

idk01 · 2 March 2010, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosco

what is this thing.... Yuck....

http://cgi.ebay.com/Hublot-Big-Bang-...item2eab7872dd

He even dared to take the back off

Taking the back off this Hunkus De Junkus would send the time space continuum into a spin, need to can this crap!

TheBluePrince · 2 March 2010, 10:27 PM

Aw it's gone, didn't see.

Mosco · 2 March 2010, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Earl Camembert

I don't know how people that deal not only in different models of a brand but different brands can possibly know every nuance that could have been.

I would not consider this watch not because I know anything about it but because the pictures are blurry and the seller has been around two months with a 7 feed back; he never sold a watch, the biggest thing was software. I wonder if it was legitimate?

On that one, it was easy - the rotor on the real one is tungsten, not tuna-can metal like in the offender's example

Trust me on it, it was an awful fake!

Mosco · 2 March 2010, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idk01

Taking the back off this Hunkus De Junkus would send the time space continuum into a spin, need to can this crap!

I think it has.... All my clocks are running backwards

idk01 · 2 March 2010, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosco

I think it has.... All my clocks are running backwards

Even my Seiko Digital went backwards on that one

Guys, just for reference, here is a pic of the genuine:

I should have posted the pic of the fake just to compare, well there was no comparison the subdials we so far off it was ridiculous :-)

1000ftSub · 2 March 2010, 11:15 PM

Yup, the really inside looks NOTHING like that.

2 March 2010, 01:43 PM	#1
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	Not even trying... what is this thing.... Yuck.... http://cgi.ebay.com/Hublot-Big-Bang-...item2eab7872dd He even dared to take the back off __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

2 March 2010, 06:29 PM	#6
crazyfingers "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Arjun Location: India Watch: Submariner 14060M Posts: 347	"I have put the starting price lower, because the watch is not new, and I wanted many people to participate. I am convinced that everyone will appreciate the beauty and quality of this watch, well known worldwide. " What a thoughtful chap __________________ *Buy less, but buy better!* http://watchesindia.blogspot.com/

2 March 2010, 01:46 PM	#2
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471	The movement just looks bad!

2 March 2010, 03:20 PM	#3
Earl Camembert Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,858	I don't know how people that deal not only in different models of a brand but different brands can possibly know every nuance that could have been. I would not consider this watch not because I know anything about it but because the pictures are blurry and the seller has been around two months with a 7 feed back; he never sold a watch, the biggest thing was software. I wonder if it was legitimate?

2 March 2010, 03:51 PM	#4
ParisDakarBmw Banned Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: New Haven, CT Watch: 116610 Sub-C Posts: 6,552	That watch doesn't have any luster that the real ones have. I would say it's a fake, and then the small feedback. I'd stay away.

2 March 2010, 06:05 PM	#5
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	Look at that chinese POS that they want us to believe to be a Hublot movement ..

2 March 2010, 10:27 PM	#8
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Aw it's gone, didn't see.

2 March 2010, 11:15 PM	#12
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471	Yup, the really inside looks NOTHING like that.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)