The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 March 2010, 05:10 AM   #1
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
Broken heart

My heart was broken today :

The new Tudor Chrono is equipped with a Eta 2892 with a DD 2054 module.

The watch is assembled and testes in the Rolex facility.

I'll pass on this one, don't like the module and its service possibilities.
Jackxv is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:19 AM   #2
Nicko
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
So, I'm not quite sure I understand. Is this a bad thing becuse of the ETA Movement?
Nicko is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:23 AM   #3
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
It is a Tudor, not a Rolex. Were you expecting a Rolex movement also, that is the reason they are so much cheaper. Nothing wrong with a ETA movement IMHO, solid movements.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:25 AM   #4
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
Confused
ParisDakarBmw is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:26 AM   #5
Noonan
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
I'd prefer that to a modified 7750.
Noonan is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:29 AM   #6
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
Speedmaster

The 2892 is a good movement but the module is almost unservicable.
When there are defects in it it's easier to change it than service it.

My indepedant watch maker will not service a module movement.


Jack
Jackxv is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:30 AM   #7
Nicko
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackxv View Post
The 2892 is a good movement but the module is almost unservicable.
When there are defects in it it's easier to change it than service it.

My indepedant watch maker will not service a module movement.


Jack
Thanks for the clarification...
Nicko is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:32 AM   #8
cronin
"TRF" Member
 
cronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Drew
Location: .
Posts: 299
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!
cronin is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:33 AM   #9
Nicko
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!

Nicko is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:36 AM   #10
Prince
"TRF" Member
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!
LOL! That sounds like a RADO to me!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society
"You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson
Prince is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:40 AM   #11
DRAWTOOL
"TRF" Member
 
DRAWTOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
This is all about as clear as mud to me, what exactly is a DD 2054 module?
__________________
Dances with Dogs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
And you call that a nightmare, ya tosser?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
You just made it into the Tosser Hall of Fame, ya bastid tosser!!
Inducted 3/25/10
DRAWTOOL is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:41 AM   #12
Colorao
"TRF" Member
 
Colorao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere
Watch: SS M-Submariner
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!
x2!!!!!!!! Yeah
Colorao is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:51 AM   #13
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
Explanation

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRAWTOOL View Post
This is all about as clear as mud to me, what exactly is a DD 2054 module?
The Eta 2892 is a perfect normal, low profile, automatic high beat movement but not a chronograph.

On top op this movement there's a extra plate with a chronograph parts placed on it.
This is a completely different idea of a chronograph movement in comparisson to a 7750 or the high end chronograph movements with column wheel.

I wasn't expecting a Rolex movement but neither a Omega Speedmaster reduced one.....

The Valjoux 7750 is much more reliable as the 2892 with DD.
All the cheaper Swatch group auto Chrono's use this movement and module.

Offcourse the watch is assembled and QC by Rolex in their headquarters that might be the part to pull over potential buyers.

Redirecting the counters on Valjoux 775X and the date at 6 would've been virtually impossible.

Jack
Jackxv is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 05:58 AM   #14
CoopJr
"TRF" Member
 
CoopJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Coop
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Subs
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!


CoopJr is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:04 AM   #15
AstroBoy
"TRF" Member
 
AstroBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Lucky
Location: Ohio USA
Watch: TT-Tona/EXII/Tudor
Posts: 696
How you do that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!
Now...That's an idea!

a very small hamspster i bet!
__________________
Astroboy

"Life Is Not A Problem To Be Solved But A Reality To Be Experienced"

"JJ - Your smile takes all my troubles away!"
AstroBoy is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:10 AM   #16
Rscmaine
"TRF" Member
 
Rscmaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nat Parkinson
Location: Maine, USA
Watch: me pull a rabbit..
Posts: 1,196
I had a Doxa with a 2892 movement that was as accurate as get out. If the modular aspect is that big a concern you can buy and entire spare 2892 movement from Otto Frei for $186 and simple throw away that entire module every 5 years.

Sounds pretty simple to me.
__________________
When the alien spaceships actually landed, to everyone's surprise, it turned out that the world's governments had not been hiding anything. They were just as clueless as the rest of us!
Rscmaine is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:15 AM   #17
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
Not..

The problem is not the 2892, that pretty reliable. The module is not, that is the extra plate produced by Dubois et Depraz.



Jack
Jackxv is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:34 AM   #18
GMTcrazy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Makati/FL
Posts: 301
So how much does a new module cost, since you say you can't service it???

GT
GMTcrazy is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:40 AM   #19
zillap
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Martin
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronin View Post
I dont care if there is a hampster on a wheel inside I still love that watch!
HAHAHAHAHAHA
zillap is offline  
Old 23 March 2010, 06:58 AM   #20
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
I'm in the camp of 'hampster wheel' too...I really could care less when it comes to what movement is in my watch, as long as it keeps excellent time, is an automatic and, well...are those two things!
outtatime is offline  
Old 25 March 2010, 04:56 AM   #21
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
I don't get it? Why didn't they just use a Val 7750? Disappointed.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline  
Old 25 March 2010, 07:11 AM   #22
TheBluePrince
"TRF" Member
 
TheBluePrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
I don't get it? Why didn't they just use a Val 7750? Disappointed.
Because the chrono layout and functionality is wrong.

If these things break it's gonna be the RSC way to fix them or no-way. And after the 2 year warranty that's gonna be £££ i recks.
TheBluePrince is offline  
Old 25 March 2010, 07:18 AM   #23
Safetrends
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
Tudor = Tudor

Rolex = Rolex

Tudor + Rolex = Tulex

Rolex + Tudor= Rudor


Safetrends is offline  
Old 25 March 2010, 07:34 AM   #24
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackxv View Post
The Eta 2892 is a perfect normal, low profile, automatic high beat movement but not a chronograph.

On top op this movement there's a extra plate with a chronograph parts placed on it.
This is a completely different idea of a chronograph movement in comparisson to a 7750 or the high end chronograph movements with column wheel.

I wasn't expecting a Rolex movement but neither a Omega Speedmaster reduced one.....

The Valjoux 7750 is much more reliable as the 2892 with DD.
All the cheaper Swatch group auto Chrono's use this movement and module.

Offcourse the watch is assembled and QC by Rolex in their headquarters that might be the part to pull over potential buyers.

Redirecting the counters on Valjoux 775X and the date at 6 would've been virtually impossible.

Jack
How does it compare with the 4130 on the Daytona in terms of accuracy and stability?
__________________
Rest in peace JJ!
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani

"Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly"
mpkRolex is online now  
Old 25 March 2010, 07:37 AM   #25
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by outtatime View Post
I'm in the camp of 'hampster wheel' too...I really could care less when it comes to what movement is in my watch, as long as it keeps excellent time, is an automatic and, well...are those two things!
The hampster will go on for two years with warranty. Soon after two years if the hampster decides to take a break you are out of luck.
__________________
Rest in peace JJ!
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani

"Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly"
mpkRolex is online now  
Old 25 March 2010, 07:40 AM   #26
TheBluePrince
"TRF" Member
 
TheBluePrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
I think my plan is gonna be buy both, sell the one i like the least after a week and then sell the other after 12-18 months with plenty of warranty left. I'm sure i'll be bored of it after One month anyway.

If there is any crap/problems at all within the first month i'll be giving it back for a refund though - not messing around with it.
TheBluePrince is offline  
Old 26 March 2010, 12:00 AM   #27
Jackxv
"TRF" Member
 
Jackxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
4130

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpkRolex View Post
How does it compare with the 4130 on the Daytona in terms of accuracy and stability?
The 4130 is one of the best chrono movements around.
Very, Very reliable and serviceble.

It can compete with AP, Jaeger, PP and all the other high end chrono's.



Jack
Jackxv is offline  
Old 26 March 2010, 12:53 AM   #28
Tylden Reed
TechXpert
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackxv View Post
The Eta 2892 is a perfect normal, low profile, automatic high beat movement but not a chronograph.

On top op this movement there's a extra plate with a chronograph parts placed on it.
This is a completely different idea of a chronograph movement in comparisson to a 7750 or the high end chronograph movements with column wheel.

I wasn't expecting a Rolex movement but neither a Omega Speedmaster reduced one.....

The Valjoux 7750 is much more reliable as the 2892 with DD.
All the cheaper Swatch group auto Chrono's use this movement and module.

Offcourse the watch is assembled and QC by Rolex in their headquarters that might be the part to pull over potential buyers.

Redirecting the counters on Valjoux 775X and the date at 6 would've been virtually impossible.

Jack
Hi Jack. I've often fully serviced both the ETA and the Val. 7750 ( I own a Longines with Cal 7751 - with moon phase ) and would agree with you that, when it comes to servicing, the 7750 is far superior to the ETA 2892 + DD module. In my opinion it is also stronger. Tylden.
Tylden Reed is offline  
Old 26 March 2010, 12:53 AM   #29
AstroBoy
"TRF" Member
 
AstroBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Lucky
Location: Ohio USA
Watch: TT-Tona/EXII/Tudor
Posts: 696
You Should Be....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Safetrends View Post
Tudor = Tudor

Rolex = Rolex

Tudor + Rolex = Tulex

Rolex + Tudor= Rudor


...a poet!...
__________________
Astroboy

"Life Is Not A Problem To Be Solved But A Reality To Be Experienced"

"JJ - Your smile takes all my troubles away!"
AstroBoy is offline  
Old 26 March 2010, 01:26 AM   #30
acce1999
"TRF" Member
 
acce1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tylden Reed View Post
Hi Jack. I've often fully serviced both the ETA and the Val. 7750 ( I own a Longines with Cal 7751 - with moon phase ) and would agree with you that, when it comes to servicing, the 7750 is far superior to the ETA 2892 + DD module. In my opinion it is also stronger. Tylden.
Tylden, could you elaborate a bit on "stronger"? Do you find it to be stronger in terms of capability to take shocks, or in longevity/intervals between service (parts not breaking as easy), or in terms of power reserve, or in terms of accuracy/consistency? (Perhaps all of them)

Best,

A
acce1999 is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.