The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 20 April 2010, 05:32 AM   #7
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
Thank you for your thoughts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Perhaps...... There are differences..

Rolex uses a full balance bridge and larger balance wheel (more mass, better stability), so it will distort less when conditions are less than ideal.. They also use a Breguet over-coil that helps with isochronism, and also, then, keeps the beat at less than ideal conditions over the entire mainspring torque curve.. The free sprung balance also isolates critical parts when others are less than perfect...

So, an argument could be made (or a theory postulated) that a Rolex movement could continue to keep admirable time even if some parts are on the point of failure; whereas, the 2892-2 could/would show poor cadence much sooner.....
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.