ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 April 2010, 02:02 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
Date Just ref 1500 ?
Something iffy here :
http://cgi.ebay.fr/ROLEX-DATEJUST-OY...#ht_500wt_1182 Different style of pictures ( I suspect stolen ) showing a Date Just but in his description sellers claims that the case is marked 1500 ? Gives part of the serial to date it and the end links . "montre rolex oysterperpetual datejust montre à mouvement automatique reference 1500 gravé sur boitier référence de fabrication no: 5451*** bien visible sur la montre correspondant à l'année 1977 taille aprox.35 mm hors couronne, cadran texturé original couleur argentémarqueurs et aiguilles impécables bracelet rolex jubilée original avec tout les maillons montés sur embout 555 mouvement rolex automatique calibre 1570 de 26 rubis ,5 positions tres bien entretenu |
27 April 2010, 02:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Flint, MI
Watch: Ω 3570.50.00
Posts: 2,058
|
Clicked link, shows GMT
Can only sort of make out the non-english. claiming its a 1977 is correct based on the 5,4xx,xxx serial number, but I can not get a good look at the dial Mines a 1603 (5,19x,xxx), and it should have the 1570 movement. From what I can see, the date window and number font look ok... sort of on an angle. My end links are also 555. looks legit, but thats the best I can do with that picture.
__________________
Miss you JJ Wash out this tired notion that the best is yet to come |
27 April 2010, 02:26 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
OOOPS , Link corrected . Sorry about that
|
27 April 2010, 02:40 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Flint, MI
Watch: Ω 3570.50.00
Posts: 2,058
|
Tristan,
You could be very right about the stolen pics... not the same size at all. The pics dont help me... and again, I can not really read the discription. Seems shady to me, why not take better pics, ya know? Could be legit, but I dont get that impression. That information about the serial number, movement, and year and so on can be looked up on lots of websites. So without better pictures, I'd steer clear.
__________________
Miss you JJ Wash out this tired notion that the best is yet to come |
27 April 2010, 03:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
|
A ref. 1500 is a "-Date-" and I think it's smaller than a DateJust.
|
27 April 2010, 11:33 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
No luck in finding those pics I smell a scam though!!!
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
28 April 2010, 01:19 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
More of a stink , then a smell IMHO
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.