ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

otree-1 · 12 May 2010, 07:35 AM

What do you think? I need to make a decision and it is getting very difficult.

1000ftSub · 12 May 2010, 07:37 AM

If i had to pick i would probably take the GMT IIc.

matt.wu · 12 May 2010, 07:44 AM

SS sub is a classic and the one I would probably pick first.

The GMT Master · 12 May 2010, 07:48 AM

I'd take the GMT IIc, it's a superbly engineered watch, and, in my opinion, feels that little bit more refined than the 16610. I personally prefer the chunkier construction, and the dressy looks of the GMT, plus the GMT complication would have more use for me than the diver's bezel.

However, either way, you're getting a great watch - you can't go wrong with either

sea-dweller · 12 May 2010, 08:45 AM

I would buy the Sub first...

MortgageGuy · 12 May 2010, 09:02 AM

I would buy the Sub first as well... its a classic and wont be around long BNIB at today's prices... The GMT however will be. Good Luck

JMIND · 12 May 2010, 09:10 AM

I chose the ss sub date and very pleased with it. You can try both on and see which one grabs you the most. Good luck.

landroverking · 12 May 2010, 09:47 AM

Gmt

Dr. Robert · 12 May 2010, 09:51 AM

I vote for the Rolex sub...an icon in the watch world.

dalip · 12 May 2010, 09:52 AM

GMT....love the Sub...but I'd rather have a GMT and get a DSSD/SD in time

sakuraba · 12 May 2010, 09:58 AM

Sub for me. The PCLs would drive me nuts.

Kapture1 · 12 May 2010, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1000ftsub

if i had to pick i would probably take the gmt iic.

+1

Perdu · 12 May 2010, 10:03 AM

Try them both on and you'll know.

andrew79 · 12 May 2010, 10:18 AM

I believe price isn't a factor at all.... so.... GMT iic

hennabav · 12 May 2010, 11:02 AM

I think I will probably have to go with the GMT on this one. I just love the PCLs and the bezel looks to be more sharp than the Sub ceramic.

wisguy · 12 May 2010, 11:12 AM

A couple of months ago I faced the same issue, I bought the GMTIIc.

My reasons:

1. Much better bracelet in the GMTIIc, even if I'm not crazy about the PCL's.
2. Ceramic bezel
3. Didn't want to buy that will be essentially old in a couple of months
4. I don't dive, but I do travel
5. The maxi-case and maxi-dial of the GMTIIc are more inline with the times
6. Did I mention the better bracelet?? For me this was a deal breaker with the Sub

Latrodectus · 12 May 2010, 11:14 AM

GMT would be my pick.

nauticajoe · 12 May 2010, 11:15 AM

That's a tough one. Both great watches. If I can do it again, I'd probably lean towards the Sub. It's comfortable on the wrist since it sits higher.
The IIc is also a great watch, but felt the bezel was a bit too 'busy'. The PCL's takes some time to get used to.
Also, keep in mind that it'll probably be more difficult, in time, to find the Sub BNIB (assuming you're going for 'new'), since its being discontinued. The IIc will be around for awhile.
Good luck & Happy Hunting!

dama156 · 12 May 2010, 11:17 AM

gmt but im biased.

scl6118 · 12 May 2010, 12:17 PM

Iic!

Traveler · 12 May 2010, 12:21 PM

Flip a coin !

Psmith · 12 May 2010, 12:31 PM

GMT IIc

Imo, the nicest SS Rolex...

Cheers

wrxsti · 12 May 2010, 12:31 PM

You can't go wrong with either. I wanted a sub for as long as I could remember and started to save. When I had enough cash I tried on the sub and the gmt, but the gmt smiled back at me. You will know when you try both on.

The following improvements made my decision:
-updated bracelet with half link adjustment
-new super case, larger crown and guards
-maxi dial and hands
-polished links (i love them even though at first i wanted brushed)
-anti reflective cyclops

but what do I know...

Andy

Z-Sub · 12 May 2010, 12:41 PM

Sub first for me and then GMT

bounce · 12 May 2010, 08:24 PM

I had the GMT IIc & traded it for a Sub, I didn't like all the scratches the GMT kept picking up. If you don't mind that its a great watch.

multimedia · 12 May 2010, 08:27 PM

GMT for me, but then again I'm a bit bias...

Cheers,
Joe

WatchSmith · 12 May 2010, 08:50 PM

GMT for sure

bokmeipai · 12 May 2010, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by otree-1

What do you think? I need to make a decision and it is getting very difficult.

how about buying one now & the other one later? They are both good watches with different functions, the GMT for travelling & SUb for diving.

gqllc · 12 May 2010, 10:09 PM

I ended up buying both. I bought the Sub LV first but still really longed for the GMTc. I finally traded my tt blue sub for the GMTc. I felt that I did not need two subs and the tt blue sub just sat in the safe. I have a tt Datejust2 so I have not missed the tt blue sub in the slightest. Both SS Sub and GMTc are similair but distinctively different if you know what I mean...That is why I got the Sub LV...the green bezel is "different" enough for me compared to the GMTc!

chillviper · 12 May 2010, 10:10 PM

GMT. You'll always be able to find a pre-owned Sub if you want one or more likely pick up the new ceramic one.

12 May 2010, 07:35 AM	#1
otree-1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Virginia Watch: TT Submariner Posts: 48	Current SS Submariner or SS GMTIIc What do you think? I need to make a decision and it is getting very difficult.

12 May 2010, 08:45 AM	#5
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I would buy the Sub first... __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

12 May 2010, 09:02 AM	#6
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	I would buy the Sub first as well... its a classic and wont be around long BNIB at today's prices... The GMT however will be. Good Luck __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

12 May 2010, 09:52 AM	#10
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	GMT....love the Sub...but I'd rather have a GMT and get a DSSD/SD in time __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

12 May 2010, 09:58 AM	#11
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	Sub for me. The PCLs would drive me nuts. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

12 May 2010, 07:37 AM	#2
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471	If i had to pick i would probably take the GMT IIc.

12 May 2010, 07:44 AM	#3
matt.wu "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bay Area, CA, USA Posts: 884	SS sub is a classic and the one I would probably pick first.

12 May 2010, 07:48 AM	#4
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	I'd take the GMT IIc, it's a superbly engineered watch, and, in my opinion, feels that little bit more refined than the 16610. I personally prefer the chunkier construction, and the dressy looks of the GMT, plus the GMT complication would have more use for me than the diver's bezel. However, either way, you're getting a great watch - you can't go wrong with either

12 May 2010, 09:10 AM	#7
JMIND "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Jerry Location: New Mexico Watch: 16610 M Series Posts: 1,084	I chose the ss sub date and very pleased with it. You can try both on and see which one grabs you the most. Good luck.

12 May 2010, 09:47 AM	#8
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Gmt

12 May 2010, 09:51 AM	#9
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,288	I vote for the Rolex sub...an icon in the watch world.

12 May 2010, 10:03 AM	#13
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	Try them both on and you'll know. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

12 May 2010, 10:18 AM	#14
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	I believe price isn't a factor at all.... so.... GMT iic __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

12 May 2010, 11:02 AM	#15
hennabav Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jon Location: New England Watch: --Rolex-- Posts: 2,391	I think I will probably have to go with the GMT on this one. I just love the PCLs and the bezel looks to be more sharp than the Sub ceramic.

12 May 2010, 11:12 AM	#16
wisguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,406	A couple of months ago I faced the same issue, I bought the GMTIIc. My reasons: 1. Much better bracelet in the GMTIIc, even if I'm not crazy about the PCL's. 2. Ceramic bezel 3. Didn't want to buy that will be essentially old in a couple of months 4. I don't dive, but I do travel 5. The maxi-case and maxi-dial of the GMTIIc are more inline with the times 6. Did I mention the better bracelet?? For me this was a deal breaker with the Sub

12 May 2010, 11:14 AM	#17
Latrodectus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Fred Location: KY, USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 10,043	GMT would be my pick. __________________ Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group

12 May 2010, 11:15 AM	#18
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	That's a tough one. Both great watches. If I can do it again, I'd probably lean towards the Sub. It's comfortable on the wrist since it sits higher. The IIc is also a great watch, but felt the bezel was a bit too 'busy'. The PCL's takes some time to get used to. Also, keep in mind that it'll probably be more difficult, in time, to find the Sub BNIB (assuming you're going for 'new'), since its being discontinued. The IIc will be around for awhile. Good luck & Happy Hunting!

12 May 2010, 11:17 AM	#19
dama156 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: David Location: Long Island, NY Watch: gmt c Posts: 130	gmt but im biased.

12 May 2010, 12:17 PM	#20
scl6118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Shawn Location: United States Watch: SS GMT IIC Posts: 1,624	Iic! __________________ Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules :

12 May 2010, 12:21 PM	#21
Traveler Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 374	Flip a coin !

12 May 2010, 12:31 PM	#22
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	GMT IIc Imo, the nicest SS Rolex... Cheers __________________

12 May 2010, 12:31 PM	#23
wrxsti "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth Posts: 1,695	You can't go wrong with either. I wanted a sub for as long as I could remember and started to save. When I had enough cash I tried on the sub and the gmt, but the gmt smiled back at me. You will know when you try both on. The following improvements made my decision: -updated bracelet with half link adjustment -new super case, larger crown and guards -maxi dial and hands -polished links (i love them even though at first i wanted brushed) -anti reflective cyclops but what do I know... Andy __________________ PP Geneva

12 May 2010, 12:41 PM	#24
Z-Sub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man Posts: 7,383	Sub first for me and then GMT __________________ SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297

12 May 2010, 08:24 PM	#25
bounce Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: kent Posts: 234	I had the GMT IIc & traded it for a Sub, I didn't like all the scratches the GMT kept picking up. If you don't mind that its a great watch.

12 May 2010, 08:27 PM	#26
multimedia "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Joe Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,835	GMT for me, but then again I'm a bit bias... Cheers, Joe __________________ "Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." - S.J.

12 May 2010, 08:50 PM	#27
WatchSmith 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA Posts: 702	GMT for sure

12 May 2010, 10:09 PM	#29
gqllc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Albany NY Watch: Blue Bezel SubC Posts: 1,511	I ended up buying both. I bought the Sub LV first but still really longed for the GMTc. I finally traded my tt blue sub for the GMTc. I felt that I did not need two subs and the tt blue sub just sat in the safe. I have a tt Datejust2 so I have not missed the tt blue sub in the slightest. Both SS Sub and GMTc are similair but distinctively different if you know what I mean...That is why I got the Sub LV...the green bezel is "different" enough for me compared to the GMTc! __________________ K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC

12 May 2010, 10:10 PM	#30
chillviper "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Atlanta Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 509	GMT. You'll always be able to find a pre-owned Sub if you want one or more likely pick up the new ceramic one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)