ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 May 2010, 10:28 AM | #1 |
Removed
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tokyo
Watch: 16600K (lug holes)
Posts: 182
|
Rolex Owner Opinion Survey
I offer the following Rolex Owner Opinion Survey on the subject of customization.
Interested TRF members may either respond via open reply or PM. DISCLAIMER: None of the data gathered in this process will be used for any useful purpose, just killing time on TRF. I will tabulate and report the results of the survey (without TRF member user or real names) after the thread runs its course. Thank you in advance for your participation. Enjoy the survey! V/R, Michael Multiple Choice Answer Options (Choose only one) A: Strongly agree B: Somewhat agree C: No opinion D: Somewhat disagree E: Strongly disagree Answer Format Sample: 1.A2.B3.C4.D5.E6.A7.B8.C9.D10.E11.A12.B13.C14. Rolex Owner Opinion Survey on the subject of customization (14 questions) Note: The phrase, “non standard Rolex” refers to an authentic Rolex component installed on a Rolex model for which it was not designed or intended. (e.g., a red GMTII 24-hour hand on a GMTIIC) 1. I think Rolex owners should make NO changes to watch or bracelet of any kind other than scheduled maintenance or necessary repair. 2. I think the use of NATO or ZULU style nylon or fabric straps IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 3. I think the installation of transparent case backs IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 4. I think removal of the cyclops lens IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 5. I think brushing out PCLs IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., TT or SS GMTIIC) 6. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex bezel IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a blue WG Sub bezel on a SS Sub) 7. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex dial IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a blue WG Sub dial on a SS Sub) 8. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex hand IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a red GMTII 24-hour hand on a GMTIIC) 9. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a modified GMTIIC SL bracelet on a GMTII) 10. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex clasp IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a Daytona clasp on a YM) 11. I think the installation of a PVD/DLC “blacked out” or otherwise modified Rolex part IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a customized black PVD Rolex Daytona crown and pushers kit) 12. I think the purchase of a complete PVD/DLC “blacked out” or otherwise fully modified Rolex watch and bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., Project X customized Rolex models) 13. I think the installation of an aftermarket or custom made NON Rolex part IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., Hadley-Roma look-a-like bracelets and clasps) 14. I think the application of additional precious metals or jewels to watch or bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., gold plated and/or diamond encrusted hip-hop bling) |
25 May 2010, 11:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
1.b2.e3.c4.c5.b6.e7.e8.e9.e10.e11.c12.c13.e14.e
|
25 May 2010, 11:50 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nowhere
Posts: 283
|
1.e 2.a 3.a 4.a 5.a 6.a 7.a 8.a 9.a 10.a 11.a 12.a 13.a 14.a
I think if you want to do it..do it |
25 May 2010, 12:01 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 300
|
1:A, 2-14:E. Call me closed-minded.
|
25 May 2010, 12:04 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I think you should do whatever you want with your own watch. But, good luck trying to sell your non-standard watch.
|
25 May 2010, 12:07 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
|
You paid for it, so you can do whatever you want with it.
|
25 May 2010, 12:13 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
1.a 2.a 3.e 4.e 5.e 6.e 7.e 8.e 9.e 10.e 11.e 12.e 13.e 14.e
__________________
16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV |
25 May 2010, 03:43 PM | #8 |
Removed
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tokyo
Watch: 16600K (lug holes)
Posts: 182
|
Your Opinion Matters
For those who replied with a single opinion statement, would appreciate it if you would provide your opinion on each of the 14 survey questions (per the provided answer format) so that a more detailed assessment of results can be performed.
Thank you. V/R, Michael |
25 May 2010, 03:47 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
|
What ever frosts your flakes.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
25 May 2010, 05:14 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 884
|
1. e
2. a 3. a 4. a 5. a 6. b 7. b 8. a 9. a 10. a 11. a 12. a 13. d 14. c For the most part, I'm all for doing whatever you want with your own watch - I'm not going to have someone tell me what I can and cannot do with my watch |
25 May 2010, 06:18 PM | #11 |
Removed
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tokyo
Watch: 16600K (lug holes)
Posts: 182
|
Lot's of PM responses.
Thanks to all those who took the time to answer the survey. V/R, Michael |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.