The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 September 2010, 11:41 PM   #1
rolexdeepsea
"TRF" Member
 
rolexdeepsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: england
Posts: 251
Time keeping!!

My rolex deepsea is +2 second a day is that normal for an expensive watch.
My local deal said that normal can't say I was not disappointted in hearing that!
If not normal should I get it look at under Warranty...my Dealer said rolex wouldn't touch it unless it was over the chronometer stand off -/+
rolexdeepsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2010, 11:46 PM   #2
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
as long as it is checked against a proper timing source, then it is well with in the COSC standard.

the average daily rate of a COSC certaified movement is -4/+6 seconds
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2010, 11:47 PM   #3
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
+2 is considered very good timekeeping in a mechanical watch.

Rolex advertises their watches will adhere to COSC specs; +6 to -4 seconds per day. If you take it in for adjustment to closer than that, they will set it to run roughly +2 seconds per day. Sometimes overnight resting position can give you a slight improvement. For instance, mine runs a second or so slower if I leave it crown up on the table at night.

Quartz watches run a bit more accurately, within +/- 15 seconds a month, but few mechanical watches are as accurate as Rolexes, and I've never seen one better. Enjoy!
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 01:20 AM   #4
wuzzzer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexdeepsea View Post
My rolex deepsea is +2 second a day is that normal for an expensive watch.
My local deal said that normal can't say I was not disappointted in hearing that!
If not normal should I get it look at under Warranty...my Dealer said rolex wouldn't touch it unless it was over the chronometer stand off -/+
The cost of a watch has absolutely nothing to do with the accuracy of it.
wuzzzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 01:47 AM   #5
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexdeepsea View Post
My rolex deepsea is +2 second a day is that normal for an expensive watch.
My local deal said that normal can't say I was not disappointted in hearing that!
If not normal should I get it look at under Warranty...my Dealer said rolex wouldn't touch it unless it was over the chronometer stand off -/+
Your watch is only showing 99.998% accuracy please tell me of any other purely mechanical item that has the precision of a mechanical watch.You should be singing your watches praises thats its showing such accuracy.Now the escapement of a mechanical watch in 24 hours pushes the gears 432,000 times in a 24 hours and a day has 86,400 seconds and your disappointed by a +2 second gain out of those 86.400 seconds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuzzzer View Post
The cost of a watch has absolutely nothing to do with the accuracy of it.
Have to agree if you want almost perfect accuracy buy a quartz or radio controlled.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 03:23 AM   #6
Rolexsd4000
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexsd4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: N.Y
Watch: SD43 Mk1 , TT SD43
Posts: 970
I would keep it the way it is. I like my watches on the +side. My DS was running -2 per day. Went back to RCS NYC. They confirmed it . Now its regualted to +1 to +1.5 per day depending on the dial position during the night.
__________________
Rolexsd4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 03:44 AM   #7
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
That is excellent accuracy. Keep in mind consistency is the real key. If your watch is consistently +2 a day is as accurate as it can be. I would hesitate regulating it (trying to get it to +/- o). Might find it would be off more.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 03:56 AM   #8
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Remember also that this device is in constant mothion as you go about your day. That means all sorts of variable forces are acting on it and yet it still maintains incredible accuracy.

I think you owe your DS an apology and a hug!
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 03:58 AM   #9
Captainz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Aldo
Location: Left Coast
Watch: All of them
Posts: 879
Mine was -5 sec per day when I first got it. Once it breaks in it will perform better.

YOurs seems to be working VERY WELL!!! Congrats

Al
__________________
"The Rolex Sickness is Great, when your support group is TRF!"
-CZ
Captainz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 04:10 AM   #10
Rogue884
"TRF" Member
 
Rogue884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Texas
Watch: 216570 & 116660
Posts: 587
That is what mine is keeping
__________________

"The probability of anyone watching you do something is in direct proportion to the stupidity of what you are doing" - Warren Miller
Rogue884 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 05:16 AM   #11
sailmed
"TRF" Member
 
sailmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Barry
Location: Newtown Square
Watch: Red Sub, 5513, FF
Posts: 299
To make subtle adjustments

To gain a few sec, lay the watch dial up overnite.
To lose a few sec, lay the watch vertically on the crown.
To lose a few more, lay the watch vertically, crown upwards.

Comments, anyone?
sailmed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 05:25 AM   #12
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailmed View Post
To gain a few sec, lay the watch dial up overnite.
To lose a few sec, lay the watch vertically on the crown.
To lose a few more, lay the watch vertically, crown upwards.

Comments, anyone?
You're referring to the card below. Members have commented that it doesn't have as much effect on newer movements as on older ones.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 07:24 AM   #13
rolexdeepsea
"TRF" Member
 
rolexdeepsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: england
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuzzzer View Post
The cost of a watch has absolutely nothing to do with the accuracy of it.
wuzzer you are correct in what you have said. i was in the impression that rolex quality was prefect in time keep and that the -/+ doesn't refer to rolex.
Rolex quality wise i know it top so you are corrct to point that out!

thank you guy for clearing thing up for me you lot are the best!!

Padi56 i never make it out that i'm an expect in watches so pls don't get on your high horse!

if i have offended people here then my apology it not intension!!

yes i was disappointed in finding out my watch run at +2, now is that disappointment misplaced?... yes as i through -/+ did not effect rolex and other high end watch brand!
I was wrong to belive or think like that!!
i can see IF i made it up or lied about this, then you going into one then fine. but when i'm asking a Q on about something that is a fact, i'm surpraise that you have jumping down my throat!
just because i'm disappointted doesn't mean i do not want my roloex or looking to change it!!

if i cannot ask a Q or voice my opinion without being jump on then all you had to do was to say!!
rolexdeepsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 08:53 AM   #14
MaPham
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne, AUS
Posts: 17
i've read that the new omega 8500 movement is more accurate and seiko spring drive is the gold standard :)
MaPham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 09:07 AM   #15
docmarioce
"TRF" Member
 
docmarioce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
I read somewhere that Rolex watches have a bad reputation in regards of their accuracy but I have Omega and Hamilton and have had Breitling and all are the same. mechanical watches are not as accurate as digital but at 2 seconds a day are pretty close. Don't send your watch to calibration because you might end with a worse performer watch in the end.

Regards
docmarioce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 09:16 AM   #16
Chipmunk
"TRF" Member
 
Chipmunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
It's all good. Nothing's wrong with your watch. Wear it in good health.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

Chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 09:31 AM   #17
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
+2 seconds. OMG, return it. Better get a quartz.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 10:39 AM   #18
rolexdeepsea
"TRF" Member
 
rolexdeepsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: england
Posts: 251
i had a speedmaster that i really loved but that was always ten minute fast after 3 month and it stay 10 min fast it wouldn't go faster then 10 min....that put me off omega...on reflection 1 min a month it bloody excellent then
rolexdeepsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 10:45 AM   #19
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Most of the time when I look at my Rolex it is to look at the watch and not to check the time anyway.

Plus or minus a couple of secs daily doesn't really bother me. So if you reset it once monthly it generally won't be that far off anyway.

Just look at your Rolex and smile, I know I do.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 10:55 AM   #20
lch6257
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Lee
Location: Louisville,KY
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by dddrees View Post
Most of the time when I look at my Rolex it is to look at the watch and not to check the time anyway.

Plus or minus a couple of secs daily doesn't really bother me. So if you reset it once monthly it generally won't be that far off anyway.

Just look at your Rolex and smile, I know I do.
I am with this guy....I can't count how many times I stare at my Rolex and then realize, I forgot to check the dang time!! LMAO!! They are so beautiful....and not just for the wearer. I was out talking to my neighbor the other day, a UPS international pilot, and he kept asking me the time. Like 3 times in a 5 minute conversation. By the third time, I realized and kind of smiled cause I discovered that he just wanted to see that gorgeous Explorer II as I let him look....Next time I see him and a sunny day, wait till he gets a load of the black dial on the Sub in the sun....SIMPLY STUNNING!
lch6257 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 04:46 PM   #21
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Better than normal almost! Enjoy!
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 04:57 PM   #22
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexdeepsea View Post
wuzzer you are correct in what you have said. i was in the impression that rolex quality was prefect in time keep and that the -/+ doesn't refer to rolex.
Rolex quality wise i know it top so you are corrct to point that out!

thank you guy for clearing thing up for me you lot are the best!!

Padi56 i never make it out that i'm an expect in watches so pls don't get on your high horse!

if i have offended people here then my apology it not intension!!

yes i was disappointed in finding out my watch run at +2, now is that disappointment misplaced?... yes as i through -/+ did not effect rolex and other high end watch brand!
I was wrong to belive or think like that!!
i can see IF i made it up or lied about this, then you going into one then fine. but when i'm asking a Q on about something that is a fact, i'm surpraise that you have jumping down my throat!
just because i'm disappointted doesn't mean i do not want my roloex or looking to change it!!

if i cannot ask a Q or voice my opinion without being jump on then all you had to do was to say!!
No need to accuse people of being over sensitive by being over sensitive. You asked and they answered. It's all good, my friend. You've got a great running watch in top condition. Wear and enjoy.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 05:23 PM   #23
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaPham View Post
i've read that the new omega 8500 movement is more accurate and seiko spring drive is the gold standard :)
Dont forget the Seiko spring drive is part Quartz,but for any mechanical watch to run too or inside COSC spec IMHO is a marvel.Now when you consider what a mechanical watch has to put up with daily while on wrist.Gravity is the main enemy of mechanical watches,so today no purely mechanical watch is going to be 100% accurate any brand any price.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 06:20 PM   #24
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexdeepsea View Post

Padi56 i never make it out that i'm an expect in watches so pls don't get on your high horse!
Well not on any high horse as you put it, just stating the simple facts of the workings of any modern day mechanical watch.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 11:28 PM   #25
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
+2 is excellent. I definitely would not have the watch opened.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2010, 11:48 PM   #26
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaPham View Post
i've read that the new Omega 8500 movement is more accurate and Seiko spring drive is the gold standard :)
I have several Rolexes and two Omega 8500 movements. I find them to be equivalently accurate, and they are both remarkable. The Seiko spring drive is a purely quartz/electronic timing system, so it is not comparable.
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.