ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 12:40 AM

I know nothing about Submariner, but seems quite popular in the Rolex sporty, and recently I found a submariner without date, then what the model is, can anyone could help?

Speed · 30 September 2010, 12:46 AM

If new - 14060M

Kokyuryoku · 30 September 2010, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

I know nothing about Submariner, but seems quite popular in the Rolex sporty, and recently I found a submariner without date, then what the model is, can anyone could help?

Sub No Date

Bill is right

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speed

If new - 14060M

Thanks Bill, it seems that the new 14060M found no different with 14060.

gman54 · 30 September 2010, 01:47 AM

I've owned a stainless with date and tt with date but prefer the no date. Am in the market to purchase one.

padi56 · 30 September 2010, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Thanks Bill, it seems that the new 14060M found no different with 14060.

The 14060 will have the cal 3000 the 14060M the M stands for modified the Cal 3130 which is now basically a 3135 without the date complication.Both movements are very good not a lot the choose between them.

shirtguy · 30 September 2010, 02:18 AM

has anyone replaced the black bezel to green on a no date sub?

dedi313 · 30 September 2010, 02:44 AM

^
can't do that due to different size.

Check · 30 September 2010, 03:35 AM

Also, the 14060M (aka No date) is thinner and wears differently than the Sub date (16610 or 16610LV).

niner niner seven · 30 September 2010, 03:39 AM

why the he11 didnt rolex come out w a ceramic no date stainless? it seems without the date function it would have been an easy watch to make in comparisson to the 116610. i thought for certain basel 2010 would have came out with one.

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 03:41 AM

Thought if Rolex create a new model of Submariner based on Sub 116610LN but omit the date is the best, also change the bezel and dial to light aqua blue and rip off the bezel lume dot.

renfield33 · 30 September 2010, 03:41 AM

No date is a good weekend watch because you can let it die and then you don't have to set the date.

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 03:57 AM

Anyone could share their 14060M pics here?

esm · 30 September 2010, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Anyone could share their 14060M pics here?

dont own one - this was trying at the AD, got the Sub-C instead

TheVTCGuy · 30 September 2010, 04:07 AM

Just MHO, but the next watch I get will DEFINITELY have a date, it's the one thing I miss most when I sold my GMT for my Daytona. I don't know the price difference, and of course, you may prefer the look of a dial without a date window, but if given the choice, why not get the date feature?

Just my $.47 worth. (Inflation)

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 04:38 AM

^
Cyclops onto the date window is a well-known trademark as all we know, but bit disturb the dial is what I feel.

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

dont own one - this was trying at the AD, got the Sub-C instead

Thanks, eric, sounds good! the width of lugs seems smaller than sub date, isn't it?

DRAWTOOL · 30 September 2010, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Anyone could share their 14060M pics here?

Here is mine, Z series wearing a modified SEL bracelet.

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

The 14060 will have the cal 3000 the 14060M the M stands for modified the Cal 3130 which is now basically a 3135 without the date complication.Both movements are very good not a lot the choose between them.

Very useful information, thanks, padi56

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Check

Also, the 14060M (aka No date) is thinner and wears differently than the Sub date (16610 or 16610LV).

Thinner much better for slim wrist like me.

esm · 30 September 2010, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Thanks, eric, sounds good! the width of lugs seems smaller than sub date, isn't it?

i think the 14060M and 16610 lug is about the same width.... the Sub-C has a wider lug

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRAWTOOL

Here is mine, Z series wearing a modified SEL bracelet.

Wonderful shot, thanks drawtool, by the way, what's the SEL stands for? oic, super easy link, right? what's the original bracelet? hollow end link with cheaper stamp clasp?

esm · 30 September 2010, 05:09 AM

SEL = Solid End Links

dave thomas · 30 September 2010, 05:10 AM

here's a few pics of mine sorry got carried away with the last one.

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i think the 14060M and 16610 lug is about the same width.... the Sub-C has a wider lug

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

SEL = Solid End Links

Thanks, esm

Hansch99 · 30 September 2010, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Anyone could share their 14060M pics here?

Here are a few for you. By the way, it's a great watch.

DRAWTOOL · 30 September 2010, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Wonderful shot, thanks drawtool, by the way, what's the SEL stands for? oic, super easy link, right? what's the original bracelet? hollow end link with cheaper stamp clasp?

The original bracelet was a 93150 but if you think they are cheap....

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave thomas

here's a few pics of mine sorry got carried away with the last one.

Thanks Thomas, what I get from your pics are the 14060M is originally come from hole lugs and hollow end link, and maybe the stamped clasp, right?

Hansch99 · 30 September 2010, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

what's the original bracelet? hollow end link with cheaper stamp clasp?

Yes and yes.

Aspirin · 30 September 2010, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRAWTOOL

The original bracelet was a 93150 but if you think they are cheap....

The modified SEL bracelet costs you $$$ ?

30 September 2010, 12:40 AM	#1
Aspirin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: at home Posts: 1,330	Sub without date I know nothing about Submariner, but seems quite popular in the Rolex sporty, and recently I found a submariner without date, then what the model is, can anyone could help?

30 September 2010, 01:47 AM	#5
gman54 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gary Location: Springfield IL Watch: Explorer II Posts: 30	I've owned a stainless with date and tt with date but prefer the no date. Am in the market to purchase one. __________________ Explorer II 16550 Yacht Master 18K/SS

30 September 2010, 03:39 AM	#10
niner niner seven "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Matthew Location: Rolex&911Nation Watch: GV Posts: 547	why the he11 didnt rolex come out w a ceramic no date stainless? it seems without the date function it would have been an easy watch to make in comparisson to the 116610. i thought for certain basel 2010 would have came out with one. __________________ 16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV

30 September 2010, 03:41 AM	#12
renfield33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Watch: GMT-II Pepsi Posts: 1,051	No date is a good weekend watch because you can let it die and then you don't have to set the date. Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk __________________ Lug hole loyalist!

30 September 2010, 12:46 AM	#2
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	If new - 14060M

30 September 2010, 02:18 AM	#7
shirtguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ny Watch: sub-c Date Posts: 1,322	has anyone replaced the black bezel to green on a no date sub?

30 September 2010, 02:44 AM	#8
dedi313 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Jakarta Posts: 3	^ can't do that due to different size.

30 September 2010, 03:35 AM	#9
Check 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Matt Vera Location: So Cal Watch: Explorer (124270) Posts: 314	Also, the 14060M (aka No date) is thinner and wears differently than the Sub date (16610 or 16610LV).

30 September 2010, 03:57 AM	#13
Aspirin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: at home Posts: 1,330	Anyone could share their 14060M pics here?

30 September 2010, 04:07 AM	#15
TheVTCGuy Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Paul Location: San Diego Watch: 126619LB Posts: 21,540	Just MHO, but the next watch I get will DEFINITELY have a date, it's the one thing I miss most when I sold my GMT for my Daytona. I don't know the price difference, and of course, you may prefer the look of a dial without a date window, but if given the choice, why not get the date feature? Just my $.47 worth. (Inflation)

30 September 2010, 04:38 AM	#16
Aspirin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: at home Posts: 1,330	^ Cyclops onto the date window is a well-known trademark as all we know, but bit disturb the dial is what I feel.

30 September 2010, 05:09 AM	#23
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	SEL = Solid End Links

30 September 2010, 05:10 AM	#24
dave thomas "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Dave Location: scotland Watch: sea dweller Posts: 99	here's a few pics of mine sorry got carried away with the last one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)