The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 November 2010, 01:59 PM   #91
gold canyon
"TRF" Member
 
gold canyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 1,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Thanks...my bad.

I have seen a couple stories on TRF re: smashed ceramic bezels...but nary any pics. Leads me to believe the fragility is greatly exaggerated.
I've thought the same thing. I do like the new ceramic bezels a lot. In fact, I'd say I'm pleased with most of the improvements Rolex has been turning out lately. I think Rolex is making a strong attempt to keep there watches relevent (e.g. new technologies, improved bracelet and clasp, anti-refective coating on the cyclops, super-case, etc). HOWEVER, and IMHO, there will always be a special place in my heart for the Rolex of previous generations.
gold canyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:09 AM   #92
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
So is this alleged fragile ceramic Rolex bezel a myth?
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:13 AM   #93
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
So is this alleged fragile ceramic Rolex bezel a myth?
How many pictures of cracked bezels have been posted since the GMT-C came out in total?

I'm sure there are some around, but I've seen only 1.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:15 AM   #94
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsio View Post
How many pictures of cracked bezels have been posted since the GMT-C came out in total?

I'm sure there are some around, but I've seen only 1.
I've seen one or two after deep searches. I'm just trying to evaluate if I should just flip my Sub-C out of concern for those recessed numbers making it fragile? Will we see Sub-C specimens 40 years from now with their original ceramic bezels? Or will they all be shattered and scratched?
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:32 AM   #95
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
I've seen one or two after deep searches. I'm just trying to evaluate if I should just flip my Sub-C out of concern for those recessed numbers making it fragile? Will we see Sub-C specimens 40 years from now with their original ceramic bezels? Or will they all be shattered and scratched?
In 40 years people will be paying $10,000 for chipped and cracked ceramic bezels to give their vintage sub-C "character"
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:45 AM   #96
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsio View Post
In 40 years people will be paying $10,000 for chipped and cracked ceramic bezels to give their vintage sub-C "character"


I do wonder how the ceramic bezel inserts will age. I live in a 60 year old house and have found a couple of samples of the original ceramic tiles out in the yard where workers were doing their thing back in the day. I wonder if the ceramic Rolex bezels will hold up so well?
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 10:48 AM   #97
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
I sort of wondered what would happen if you sanded back the surface of a ceramic bezel, whether it'd be black underneath, or whether the original colour of the ceramic material would show through.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 11:17 AM   #98
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsio View Post
I sort of wondered what would happen if you sanded back the surface of a ceramic bezel, whether it'd be black underneath, or whether the original colour of the ceramic material would show through.
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 12:14 PM   #99
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsio View Post
I sort of wondered what would happen if you sanded back the surface of a ceramic bezel, whether it'd be black underneath, or whether the original colour of the ceramic material would show through.
As far as I know the colour is throughout the ceramic, not a surface glaze. If it was just a surface glaze they would be able to do any coulour and the coke/pepsi inserts would be easy to produce. And it would be very difficult to sand the surface.
Ceramics are extremely strong as long as they are well supported. I haven't seen a bezel without the insert but it would be very surprising if it was anything but flat bottomed so as to give 100% support to the insert. I think the only part that is vulnerable to chipping is the inner edge, adjacent to the crystal. So I think it would be very unlikely to have a blow to the insert at just the right spot in order to cause damage without also damaging the crystal.
I think there is a lot of paranoia about these inserts being fragile. Nothing is unbreakable but I suspect most of these watches will be fine many years down the road. I've put my hard earned money on the line in is belief!
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 12:40 PM   #100
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
With the amount of people complaining that they bang their dssds on anything and everything, I'd venture to say that the ceramic is plenty tough.
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 01:46 PM   #101
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
That's a pretty valid point, the DSSDs wears with its buttocks hanging out and the owners don't tend to baby them.

In terms of high cost consumable parts, the aluminium bezel inserts may be cheap to replace on the older subs, but the bracelets are certainly not. On the whole I really think this is going to be a more robust and durable piece as a package, even if individual part costs have gone up.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 05:18 PM   #102
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBat View Post
Then why did you buy it?
Good question. I wondered the same myself.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2010, 09:40 AM   #103
BeerNutta
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singslinger View Post
Good question. I wondered the same myself.
I didnt, fiance bought it as a wedding gift.
BeerNutta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2010, 09:50 AM   #104
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
Personally, I love them. Feels smooth and looks so damn clean!
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.