ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 December 2010, 08:14 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: phoenix
Posts: 16
|
Two Tone or Stainless Sub?
I am new to TRF and am amazed by the depth and scope of knowledge demonstrated by the members on this board. Thanks for everything you've all taught me. Here's my issue: I've decided that I want a used Sub when my budget will allow and I'm seeking opinions about whether to buy one with a stainless or a two tone bracelet (oyster). It will be my daily watch - - something that I wear primarily in a biz casual environment - but I also attend a fair amount of black tie events and wear suits about 20% of the time so versatility is key. So if I'm only going to have the one, should it be stainless or TT? Black face or blue? I'm not in the least bit flashy so I worry about the gold on a TT. Decisions, decisions. Thanks in advance for your advice.
______ "A lawyer is either a social engineer or a parasite upon society." -Charles Hamilton Houston |
11 December 2010, 08:31 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
I would suggest SS over TT....far more versatile IMO. I had a TT and it didn't last long - I really want to like YG on me (I like it on others) but can't ever come to terms with it!!!
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
11 December 2010, 08:59 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
Either will be nice, but I poersonally like the TT .. It all boils down to one very important factor .. Which do you prefer?? .. Either way you will make the right choice .. You can NEVER go wrong with a Rolex .. Congrats on you're first Rolex .. Wear it in great health
|
11 December 2010, 09:12 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I have to agree I think the SS version is more versatile personally.
|
12 December 2010, 01:04 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I like the TT DJ for a more dressy watch. My next will be a SS Sub.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
12 December 2010, 01:08 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
With regards to versatility, I believe a 16610 LN would be your best choice
|
12 December 2010, 01:13 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
|
I asked myself the same question, until I just purchased a SS Submariner Ceramic 116610. I love the two tone, but I asked myself this, Do I want to spend thousands more on the two tone which will ultimately look more scratched over time? Yes, I know I know, Rolex will make it look like new again after service - but that's supposedly over 5 years. Why have a watch for five years that will look more worn, scratched etc. Now I know everyone says that gives your watch 'character', yes it does, but in the mean time - it would just irritate me.
Are you the type of person that wants to draw a bit more attention to yourself? If so, maybe the YG is a good pick. Even though it's not 'blingy' with diamonds and a fluted bezel and all, it is definitely recognizable as a Rolex watch with real gold, I'm sure most people wouldn't think it plated, because it is a Rolex. |
12 December 2010, 01:16 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
I'm not going to argue about the utilitarian beauty of an all stainless steel Sub, but I do indeed prefer the versatility and warmer beauty of a steel & gold Sub.
Here's mine:
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
12 December 2010, 01:17 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
|
|
12 December 2010, 01:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
Both watches are beyond beautiful, however, I think that you can wear the SS everywhere. The advantage of SS is that you can be dressed down and the watch won't look out of place or go to a black tie event and look amazing. By the way the Sub and the SD look great with a Tux on because of their beautiful black dial.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
12 December 2010, 01:38 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
lovely watch. hoss
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
12 December 2010, 01:44 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
Thanks, Johny. How's the weather there, buddy? Are you staying warm??
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
12 December 2010, 01:46 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
got my chance 2 view da new HOT 116610LN n i think its da most versatile model ive seen so far...so im gon say da SS SUB C over TT
|
12 December 2010, 01:47 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
hi allan we are ok. you all ok. we have had a thaw for the moment but more to come at the end of the week. the snow has been great.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
12 December 2010, 01:50 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denmark
Watch: Daytona SS
Posts: 61
|
I love them both.. The TT is a bit more "bling" but still a classic. The SS can be a bit more "silent" and therefore very easy to use without getting too much attention.. You could also choose the LV? Here are mine..
[/QUOTE] |
12 December 2010, 02:06 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Des
Location: China
Watch: 16613 16710 116520
Posts: 2,841
|
The TT certainly does suit us over 40's better Allan
__________________
TRFs "after Dark" bar and NightClub Addict Punctuality is the courtesy shown only by Kings Dalip: "GTG posts are worthless without pics, absolutely worthless" |
12 December 2010, 02:21 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
You betcha, Des!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
12 December 2010, 02:25 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
Beautiful Subs, Dave!!!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
12 December 2010, 02:27 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
Glad you are enjoying the situation, Johny!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
12 December 2010, 02:32 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
thank you vp hurtling down a snow covered hill in a canoe whilst balancing ones drink...its not all fun you know hoss
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
12 December 2010, 02:33 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Champaign, IL
Watch: 16610lv
Posts: 818
|
I struggled with this too; I only had enough money to purchase one, so I had to make a choice. While I liked the TT look slighly more than the SS LV, my ultimate decision came down to durability, meaning in my case the ability of the watch to withstand abuse and continue to look good.
|
12 December 2010, 02:40 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
I had the blue TT for about 6 months but kept noticing that it caught people's eye, which was too much for me. I believe the value holds up better on the SS and it is much more subtle. Also, I love vintage.
|
12 December 2010, 02:43 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
If its an all-rounder watch then go SS as its the most versatile IMHO.
You can always get a TT for yor next Rolex should you have one. M |
12 December 2010, 02:46 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jack Daniels Land
Watch: me drink Guinness!
Posts: 373
|
Stainless steel with black face all the way. Can be dressed up or down and will remain timeless.
Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk |
12 December 2010, 02:50 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
The TT Subs are beautiful, but I think the SS Sub is more versatile and less "blingy". I had a 16613 in blue, but sold it and kept my 16610 and 14060 (SS Subs).
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
12 December 2010, 02:50 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
This was my first Rolex and I absolutely love it. If you get the TT, I would recommend an old 16613 over the 116613. The blue is mesmorizing. The bottom line is that you cannot go wrong either way. I am lucky enough to have this one and a classic SS Sea Dweller. Please don't make me choose! Good luck in your decision.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
12 December 2010, 03:36 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: GMTIIc, TTDJ2
Posts: 186
|
I have a ss GMTIIc but when I saw it in TT today at the AD all I gotta say is WOW. I think you should try on both and get the one that gives you the wow factor. I don't think it matters how much attention your watch brings to other people just most important that it should get yours.
|
12 December 2010, 03:39 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Fan of Steel!
|
12 December 2010, 03:43 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manila
Posts: 1,177
|
As your first Rolex sub, you can't go wrong with the more versatile SS version. Don't get me wrong, I love TT Rolexs but I still strongly suggest the SS as your first.
Here's mine: Here's my old 16800: Together:
__________________
18083 & 16750 16234 & 16233 16610 & 16800 3717-01 & 104 & 312 Nav B-Uhr |
12 December 2010, 05:11 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: phoenix
Posts: 16
|
Thanks for all the responses. I'm definitely not looking for a "bling" factor (I actually try to avoid even using such a non-word as bling). They're both beautiful but since I'm looking for timeless beauty, versatility and (to some degree) subtlety, I'm leaning heavily in favor of SS with the black face. Must...resist...urge...to...buy...right...now. Thanks, all. Cheers.
_____ "Just be yourself - everyone else is already taken." -Source Unknown |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.