ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 December 2010, 01:21 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Hague
Watch: SDDS, 116610LV
Posts: 384
|
Sub no date maxi case and dial
Hi guys!
I was just thinking of Basel 2011... Anyone have an idea how a new sub no date would look? Anyone with photoshop skills here? I guess it would be an instant hit! |
29 December 2010, 01:25 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
Not gonna happen. Rolex is content making the 14060 the way it is and there are other watches more in need of an update, like the Daytona.
|
29 December 2010, 01:28 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
A Sub ND-C is quite possible fir Basel 2011, alongside the new EXP II (fingers crossed) |
|
29 December 2010, 01:29 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 198
|
Only Rolex knows what Rolex will or will not do.
Personally I like the Sub ND the way it is. Why mess with the classic Rolex watch? |
29 December 2010, 01:37 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Hague
Watch: SDDS, 116610LV
Posts: 384
|
Some think it's messing with the classics others think it's updating the classics. Rolex have been doing that with almost every model range.
|
29 December 2010, 01:58 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
hmm..interesting...i would like to see a Sub ND with the a solid bracelet
|
29 December 2010, 02:10 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I think that both the Daytona and Sub ND will get updates, it's just a matter of "when"...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
29 December 2010, 02:13 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
I hope the Sub no date stays the way it is. I really do not care for the case on the new Sub. The rest of the improvements are nice though.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
29 December 2010, 02:58 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
My guess is with the change over the past few years to the super case/maxi dial for the rest of the sub line that it is only a matter of time that the no date will also change. Long term it does not make sense for rolex to keep them as two distinct case styles ( date vs nodate). Personally I think it would be a nice update. The current one is looking long in the tooth. Not to mention how much better the new bracelet/clasp is.
|
29 December 2010, 03:34 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
I'll bet you a brand new Sub ND it won't change at Basel 2011.
|
29 December 2010, 03:55 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Hague
Watch: SDDS, 116610LV
Posts: 384
|
|
29 December 2010, 04:26 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 348
|
|
29 December 2010, 04:52 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Hague
Watch: SDDS, 116610LV
Posts: 384
|
|
29 December 2010, 04:56 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 348
|
|
29 December 2010, 05:27 AM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
The Sub ND, otoh, has been made in the same format with the older case, bracelet, clasp, movement, etc., since approximately the end of the US Civil War. I see no future in betting the farm that it will suddenly change anytime soon. Rolex likely sees this model as a cash cow that continues to sell well despite, maybe because of, its retro format, requiring no research, no retooling or other investment. If they did change it, it would very likely only pirate a few sales from the Sub-C. Why do that for a less expensive model, it would only cost them money? |
|
29 December 2010, 05:38 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
|
29 December 2010, 05:44 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 348
|
Quote:
|
|
29 December 2010, 07:03 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
|
I do hope the Sub ND to be discontinued because I own one. :)
|
29 December 2010, 08:09 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Snook
Location: USS Bluefish
Watch: Pam24, Seamaster
Posts: 883
|
Jocke???
__________________
Truth will rise above falsehood as oil above water. - Miguel De Cervantes Last edited by Badfish179; 29 December 2010 at 08:12 AM.. Reason: change text color |
29 December 2010, 08:58 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 168
|
At the very least...
That's how I felt too until Rolex mucked up and came out with the Explorer 39mm. Anything's possible now. At the very least, put a Solid End Link bracelet on the darn SubND 14060m. Hello? The 20th Century called, they want their cheap bracelet back.
|
29 December 2010, 09:10 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
29 December 2010, 05:53 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Hague
Watch: SDDS, 116610LV
Posts: 384
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.