ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nko51 · 31 May 2007, 12:25 AM

As far as professional models! I consider the SS Sub date to be the classic standard. How do you feel?

SPACE-DWELLER · 31 May 2007, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nko51

As far as professional models! I consider the SS Sub date to be the classic standard. How do you feel?

Well.............YES

But I would add "Diver's watch" to "classic standard", since there are many other Rolex watches that could be considered as being "standard classics" in their own right.

colemanitis · 31 May 2007, 01:03 AM

Yep, I agree!

Tommer · 31 May 2007, 01:22 AM

i vote the explore I for the classic looks, sub looks just way too macho for my view.

roadcarver · 31 May 2007, 01:33 AM

Even though I own an SD, I voted yes since it is iconic. However the true dive watch would be the SD.

Alcan · 31 May 2007, 01:53 AM

I'd guess that it's the most recognizable (and copied, counterfeitted, and "homage'd") of all the Rolex professional models.

nko51 · 31 May 2007, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadcarver

Even though I own an SD, I voted yes since it is iconic. However the true dive watch would be the SD.

Yes! I agree that the SD is the true dive watch, which I also have. I guess you can say that the Sub is the default between 100m and 4000 feet.

NyOO768 · 31 May 2007, 02:24 AM

Yes, most definitely a classic! Actually the SubDate was my very first rolex I bought for myself!

nko51 · 31 May 2007, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NyOO768

Yes, most definitely a classic! Actually the SubDate was my very first rolex I bought for myself!

And lets not forget that the Sub first came out in 1953!

mikey · 31 May 2007, 02:28 AM

Well, the Sub no date would make more sense to vote on because the Rolex seen across the world was in the 007 films since the early 60s.

nko51 · 31 May 2007, 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey

Well, the Sub no date would make more sense to vote on because the Rolex seen across the world was in the 007 films since the early 60s.

Maybe I should rephrase it to say which Sub is more desirable date or non date.

JJ Irani · 31 May 2007, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nko51

Maybe I should rephrase it to say which Sub is more desirable date or non date.

Sub-date!! Without a doubt the ULTIMATE Rolex....always!!

Blue Bull · 31 May 2007, 04:33 AM

Aaah,yes,it is the commoners choice ....

C.J. · 31 May 2007, 04:39 AM

I voted no. Most popular, yes. But for the classic Rolex sports watch my vote has to go to the Submariner (non-date)

Teofilo · 31 May 2007, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C.J.

I voted no. Most popular, yes. But for the classic Rolex sports watch my vote has to go to the Submariner (non-date)

No prizes for guessing which way I voted....

JJ Irani · 31 May 2007, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teofilo

No prizes for guessing which way I voted....

Leopard Daytona?

mike · 31 May 2007, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C.J.

I voted no. Most popular, yes. But for the classic Rolex sports watch my vote has to go to the Submariner (non-date)

Heed the word

watchfreak2003 · 31 May 2007, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

Heed the word

WOW - cool pix

Teofilo · 1 June 2007, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Leopard Daytona?

Better than a sheep Daytona..........

View Poll Results: I feel the standard classic is a SS Sub date!
No	10	22.22%
Yes	35	77.78%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

31 May 2007, 12:25 AM	#1
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	I consider the SS Sub date to be....... As far as professional models! I consider the SS Sub date to be the classic standard. How do you feel? __________________

31 May 2007, 01:03 AM	#3
colemanitis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Florida Watch: PAM 1090 Posts: 3,723	Yep, I agree! __________________ Member #471

31 May 2007, 01:33 AM	#5
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	Even though I own an SD, I voted yes since it is iconic. However the true dive watch would be the SD. __________________ I'm just a cook...

31 May 2007, 01:53 AM	#6
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	I'd guess that it's the most recognizable (and copied, counterfeitted, and "homage'd") of all the Rolex professional models. __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

31 May 2007, 01:22 AM	#4
Tommer Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Tom Location: So. Cal Posts: 149	i vote the explore I for the classic looks, sub looks just way too macho for my view.

31 May 2007, 02:24 AM	#8
NyOO768 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Atlanta; USA Posts: 230	Yes, most definitely a classic! Actually the SubDate was my very first rolex I bought for myself!

31 May 2007, 02:28 AM	#10
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	Well, the Sub no date would make more sense to vote on because the Rolex seen across the world was in the 007 films since the early 60s.

31 May 2007, 04:33 AM	#13
Blue Bull Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,887	Aaah,yes,it is the commoners choice ....

31 May 2007, 04:39 AM	#14
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	I voted no. Most popular, yes. But for the classic Rolex sports watch my vote has to go to the Submariner (non-date) __________________ Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)