ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

citytime_kc · 2 April 2011, 11:55 PM

Hi
I heard panerai in-house movement so many complain.It that true???

Ben

marcinthemiddle · 3 April 2011, 12:49 AM

It's been a week and no problems with with mine...

mfer · 3 April 2011, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by citytime_kc

Hi
I heard panerai in-house movement so many complain.It that true???

Ben

It is a small community and people like to complain more than they give praise when it comes to movement problems.

Basically, there are nightmare stories and people who are like WTH, I've never had a problem.

If you are worried at all, there are plenty of nice 6497's out there. I love 'em.

B. Doggy · 3 April 2011, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

it is a small community and people like to complain more than they give praise when it comes to movement problems.

Basically, there are nightmare stories and people who are like wth, i've never had a problem.

If you are worried at all, there are plenty of nice 6497's out there. I love 'em.

+1

mike · 3 April 2011, 10:31 AM

Hi Ben,

As stated we always here the bad before the good. I have two Pams with in-house movements.

A 359 that I have not had that first minute's trouble with and that keeps amazing time. I worn the watch a LOT and except for some swirls on the polished case (I swear if you look at it it'll pick up another

) and,..

A 321 that I got about 6 weeks ago. It ran about 42 seconds fast and back to the AD it went for regulation. Because it was an in-house movement and my watchmaker has not as yet been to Panerai"s school on that movement it went to the Pam service center......and there it's been all this time.

I'm more apt to scream at their service center than any problem with the movement.

bcacncnc · 3 April 2011, 12:23 PM

I have the 8 day GMT (only a few months old) and I have not had any direct problems with the movement. I can comment however that the crown stem movement sometimes (enough to worry me) to get "stuck" when trying to push it back in after adjustment. I have heard of only one other case like this on the forum - so it may be an isolated case and not an actual design problem.

citytime_kc · 4 April 2011, 10:16 AM

Thank Bro HAVE A NICE DAY.............

nauticajoe · 4 April 2011, 10:39 AM

No problems with my 233.

maxsar · 10 April 2011, 05:22 AM

My 10 day movement keeps close to perfect time. Maybe gains a second a week.

I have been lucky my Rolex GMT 2C also keeps great time.

+SwissWatch · 10 April 2011, 09:37 AM

I have also heard of few comments with the 312s when they first came out, but lately I have not come across any negative feedback on them, looks like Panerai has sorted out the problem already, thus the popularity of the 312s now with the ristis. Anybody heard otherwise?

penangite · 10 April 2011, 12:56 PM

My PAM 312 movement is good (I'm the type who seldom complain in life though it loses 6 secs a day) but honestly, I think movement in my rolex sub is so much better, so much more accurate (+1 sec/day). But I love 312 more ...

Swede00 · 10 April 2011, 01:53 PM

Same here, have a 312 M-Series and no problems at all. Over 2 months without having to adjust the time.

kilyung · 10 April 2011, 05:05 PM

312 for almost a year and no issues.

superb · 10 April 2011, 09:41 PM

A recent thread from another site if this is ok.

> Another 312 bites the dust..so disappointed.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/35339...o+disappointed.

2 April 2011, 11:55 PM	#1
citytime_kc Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: ben Location: singapore Watch: Rolex Posts: 81	Any panerai in-house movement recommend?? Hi I heard panerai in-house movement so many complain.It that true??? Ben

3 April 2011, 12:49 AM	#2
marcinthemiddle Vacated Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Marc Location: Connecticut Watch: PAM 111 'N' Posts: 2,558	It's been a week and no problems with with mine... __________________ NAWCC Member Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Executive Dorklehead

3 April 2011, 10:31 AM	#5
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Hi Ben, As stated we always here the bad before the good. I have two Pams with in-house movements. A 359 that I have not had that first minute's trouble with and that keeps amazing time. I worn the watch a LOT and except for some swirls on the polished case (I swear if you look at it it'll pick up another) and,.. A 321 that I got about 6 weeks ago. It ran about 42 seconds fast and back to the AD it went for regulation. Because it was an in-house movement and my watchmaker has not as yet been to Panerai"s school on that movement it went to the Pam service center......and there it's been all this time. I'm more apt to scream at their service center than any problem with the movement.

3 April 2011, 12:23 PM	#6
bcacncnc "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Bryan Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,577	I have the 8 day GMT (only a few months old) and I have not had any direct problems with the movement. I can comment however that the crown stem movement sometimes (enough to worry me) to get "stuck" when trying to push it back in after adjustment. I have heard of only one other case like this on the forum - so it may be an isolated case and not an actual design problem. __________________ Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko

4 April 2011, 10:16 AM	#7
citytime_kc Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: ben Location: singapore Watch: Rolex Posts: 81	Thank Bro HAVE A NICE DAY.............

4 April 2011, 10:39 AM	#8
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	No problems with my 233.

10 April 2011, 05:22 AM	#9
maxsar "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Lawrence Location: Cincinnati Watch: Daytona Posts: 80	My 10 day movement keeps close to perfect time. Maybe gains a second a week. I have been lucky my Rolex GMT 2C also keeps great time.

10 April 2011, 09:37 AM	#10
+SwissWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Manila Posts: 32	I have also heard of few comments with the 312s when they first came out, but lately I have not come across any negative feedback on them, looks like Panerai has sorted out the problem already, thus the popularity of the 312s now with the ristis. Anybody heard otherwise?

10 April 2011, 12:56 PM	#11
penangite Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Mikey Location: Watching World Watch: Rolex & Panerai Posts: 212	My PAM 312 movement is good (I'm the type who seldom complain in life though it loses 6 secs a day) but honestly, I think movement in my rolex sub is so much better, so much more accurate (+1 sec/day). But I love 312 more ...

10 April 2011, 01:53 PM	#12
Swede00 Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Shanghai Posts: 67	Same here, have a 312 M-Series and no problems at all. Over 2 months without having to adjust the time.

10 April 2011, 05:05 PM	#13
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	312 for almost a year and no issues.

10 April 2011, 09:41 PM	#14
superb "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: anywhere but here Posts: 690	A recent thread from another site if this is ok. > Another 312 bites the dust..so disappointed. http://www.network54.com/Forum/35339...o+disappointed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)