|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 April 2011, 06:47 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
Good solid advice!
The seller (then buyer) never checked the papers once since 2007.  Not placing blame but Furman could have simply made an error and issued the wrong papers, yes they should have verified the numbers before letting the watch go but the buyer also should have verified that the correct watch is with the correct papers waaaaaaaaaaaaay back in 2007.
__________________
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode