ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rad87gn · 21 April 2011, 12:49 AM

There are two customers. Those that want lume and those that don't. Rolex has models of each.

Rolex lume works fine if used properly. And that is to charge it with bright light before expecting it to work right.

Postnikov · 21 April 2011, 01:29 AM

If you do not want lume, why do you buy watches with lume? There are so many watches without lume - but an all purpose watch (like the submariner etc. should have a lume!). Whenever I wear my watches from the 70´s with their dead tricium I am remembered of the useful lumen - just my opinion out of experience.

Dan2000 · 21 April 2011, 02:32 AM

I love lume! I often will deliberately stick my arm out in the sun while driving just to get a charge. I rarely wear my watches in the dark. I just like to see it glow. I too wish it were stronger and would last longer... wait was that my wife speaking!

watch watcher · 21 April 2011, 05:14 AM

So guys, which modern (<30 years) model Rolex offers no lume? Not that I am so desperate that I'm going to rush out and buy one.

capote · 21 April 2011, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watch watcher

So guys, which modern (<30 years) model Rolex offers no lume? Not that I am so desperate that I'm going to rush out and buy one.

Get one produced before 1998, then you will get dead tritium instead. Personally I really like lume. Those rare rare moments when the watch is actually glowing slightly is very nice

Explorer 2011 · 21 April 2011, 06:41 AM

i love my Blue Lume. Wouldn't have it any other way

tomallen · 21 April 2011, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watch watcher

Am I the only one who thinks that lume does not belong on a Rolex and other high-end watches? It is completely useless after a short while in the darkness. If I want to see the time in the dark I either lean over and look at my clock-radio, or look at my cell phone (during the day in a dark situation), which is always with me.

Worse, it cheapens the look and distracts from the beauty of the watch. If the watch has gold hands, I want to see that, not some lume splashed on it. Lume is appropriate and desirable on a $100 watch, but not an expensive one.

I was at the AD looking at the DD II. It has much more lume than my DD. Also the sport models have a lot of lume (which sort of looks appropriate for that type of watch, though). She said Rolex did that because "the prior models were hard to see"; that is in the daylight. Well, I see my other watches sans lume very well, so I'm not sure how credible her statement was.

Also, is it possible to have a watch de-lumed? I'm sure Rolex won't do it, but is it even possible to do it without ruining the hands or dial? I love the watch anyway no matter what, so I'm just wondering more than anything.

I will admit that playing with the lume is a fun thing, and there are some impressive lume shots posted here. But, on a classy watch, is just dosen't seem right, IMO.

With your clock radio and cell phone it sounds like you don't need to wear a watch.

zeuloa · 21 April 2011, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watch watcher

So guys, which modern (<30 years) model Rolex offers no lume? Not that I am so desperate that I'm going to rush out and buy one.

Datejust, DayDate, and various Cellini models.

motleynick · 19 May 2011, 06:48 PM

i love the blue lume on my deepsea!!!!

landroverking · 19 May 2011, 09:55 PM

I like lume, I will not travel or wear a watch to bed that does not have good lume.

2th Dr · 20 May 2011, 12:02 AM

I love the lume, and I for one have never had a problem reading my watches at any time of the night.

cdweller · 20 May 2011, 12:27 AM

Maybe Rolex should spend some of it's $$ on lume development, and create a new "in-house" lume that actually glows brightly and lasts. I feel like the lume is one feature on Rolexes that is constantly complained about...

I personally prefer the look of the old tritium because of the various patinas it can develop. The only downside, in my opinion, is the crumbling/cracking over time. I guess time will tell how super luminova holds up...

2th Dr · 20 May 2011, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan2000

I love lume! I often will deliberately stick my arm out in the sun while driving just to get a charge. I rarely wear my watches in the dark. I just like to see it glow. I too wish it were stronger and would last longer... wait was that my wife speaking!

Grumpy Badger · 20 May 2011, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2th DR

I love the lume, and I for one have never had a problem reading my watches at any time of the night.

That's you and me both!

tkc324 · 20 May 2011, 12:50 AM

I love lume on my watches, but I wish Rolex's lume was stonger. Panerai's lume is like a freakin torch compare to my Rolexes.

al_bongo · 20 May 2011, 12:53 AM

I don't agree with lume cheapening watches but it is utterly useless within a few minutes of putting the light out. Never mind eight or nine hours, with me eight or nine minutes is about the limit of lume.

I can only imagine that tritium must have been pretty amazing by comparison - real all night long lume.

gypsy jim · 20 May 2011, 02:59 AM

I think it would be cool if Rolex offered a sport watch with tritium tubes like Marathon.

East Bay Rider · 20 May 2011, 04:56 AM

I don't like my watches glowing in the dark being a distraction or inviting attention. Noticed it in the darkened movie theater once. Seemed nuts that reaching for the soda cup was noticeable from 5 seats down because my wrist was glowing.
Remember Timex Indiglo? At least you could turn it off.
FWIW, my Tudor has only tiny specks above the number indices and a thin area on the hands.

jamski · 20 May 2011, 05:00 AM

My 20-year old ExpII lost it's "lume" years ago. Perhaps that makes it more desirable?

gimpex · 20 May 2011, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecsub44

Every feature of a Rolex is superfluous today. You could just buy a $30 Timex and get a better watch all-round.

eric23 · 20 May 2011, 05:21 AM

I love the Blue & green lume on my while dial Millgauss! Not the reason why I got the watch, It's a nice to have option. my Air-King does not have any lume and I am OK with that too.

tinman · 20 May 2011, 10:45 AM

I have a late model Explorer I, and I don't think a whole lot of the lume on it.
After about 10 min. in darkness, I can barely read it.

I have a Bulova that cost me about $80.00 a year ago. This thing can be read all through the night when I leave it on the night stand. I went to the movie a couple nights ago, and after two hours in a dark theatre , it was still shinning great.

Picture is of the watch, and after leaving the theatre.

I wish all my other watches lume were as good as this one. I like my Rolex, but I think that they could improve the lume they use, without too much of an expense.

Art161 · 20 May 2011, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdweller

Maybe Rolex should spend some of it's $$ on lume development, and create a new "in-house" lume that actually glows brightly and lasts. I feel like the lume is one feature on Rolexes that is constantly complained about...

I personally prefer the look of the old tritium because of the various patinas it can develop. The only downside, in my opinion, is the crumbling/cracking over time. I guess time will tell how super luminova holds up...

No need for Rolex to develop "in-house" lume. Just use tritium tubes. I am seriously considering a Ball watch because of the lousy Rolex lume.

Megalobyte · 20 May 2011, 03:22 PM

I've had some of the stronger lumed watches, and while I agree the older Rolexes had fairly weak Lume, not horribly but not great, the Lume on my Sub-C however is very good, it charges quickly and lasts all night. My Panerai Sub has great Lume too, perhaps slightly better, but only because they use more.

raph · 20 May 2011, 04:34 PM

Tritium all the way... even 10yo tritium glows brighter than lume that's 5 minutes off from a full charge.

21 April 2011, 12:49 AM	#31
rad87gn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: Des Moines, Iowa Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega Posts: 1,607	There are two customers. Those that want lume and those that don't. Rolex has models of each. Rolex lume works fine if used properly. And that is to charge it with bright light before expecting it to work right. __________________ Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52

21 April 2011, 06:41 AM	#36
Explorer 2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Kris Location: ENGLAND Watch: Searching Posts: 1,038	i love my Blue Lume. Wouldn't have it any other way __________________ __________________ ROLEX Explorer 214270 "Nil Satis Nisi Optimum..."

20 May 2011, 04:56 AM	#48
East Bay Rider "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: East Bay RI Watch: GMT-II 16710LN Posts: 12,073	I don't like my watches glowing in the dark being a distraction or inviting attention. Noticed it in the darkened movie theater once. Seemed nuts that reaching for the soda cup was noticeable from 5 seats down because my wrist was glowing. Remember Timex Indiglo? At least you could turn it off. FWIW, my Tudor has only tiny specks above the number indices and a thin area on the hands. __________________ I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46

20 May 2011, 10:45 AM	#52
tinman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: richmond Posts: 9	My best lume watch I have a late model Explorer I, and I don't think a whole lot of the lume on it. After about 10 min. in darkness, I can barely read it. I have a Bulova that cost me about $80.00 a year ago. This thing can be read all through the night when I leave it on the night stand. I went to the movie a couple nights ago, and after two hours in a dark theatre , it was still shinning great. Picture is of the watch, and after leaving the theatre. I wish all my other watches lume were as good as this one. I like my Rolex, but I think that they could improve the lume they use, without too much of an expense.

21 April 2011, 01:29 AM	#32
Postnikov "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Germany Posts: 163	If you do not want lume, why do you buy watches with lume? There are so many watches without lume - but an all purpose watch (like the submariner etc. should have a lume!). Whenever I wear my watches from the 70´s with their dead tricium I am remembered of the useful lumen - just my opinion out of experience.

21 April 2011, 02:32 AM	#33
Dan2000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 120	I love lume! I often will deliberately stick my arm out in the sun while driving just to get a charge. I rarely wear my watches in the dark. I just like to see it glow. I too wish it were stronger and would last longer... wait was that my wife speaking!

21 April 2011, 05:14 AM	#34
watch watcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: ME Watch: Vintages Posts: 565	So guys, which modern (<30 years) model Rolex offers no lume? Not that I am so desperate that I'm going to rush out and buy one.

19 May 2011, 06:48 PM	#39
motleynick "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Nick Location: San Clemente Watch: DSSD-PAM312-PAM177 Posts: 15	i love the blue lume on my deepsea!!!!

19 May 2011, 09:55 PM	#40
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	I like lume, I will not travel or wear a watch to bed that does not have good lume.

20 May 2011, 12:02 AM	#41
2th Dr Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Mark-O! Location: Arlington, TX Watch: Rolex Posts: 12,714	I love the lume, and I for one have never had a problem reading my watches at any time of the night.

20 May 2011, 12:27 AM	#42
cdweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: PA Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail Posts: 1,054	Maybe Rolex should spend some of it's $$ on lume development, and create a new "in-house" lume that actually glows brightly and lasts. I feel like the lume is one feature on Rolexes that is constantly complained about... I personally prefer the look of the old tritium because of the various patinas it can develop. The only downside, in my opinion, is the crumbling/cracking over time. I guess time will tell how super luminova holds up...

20 May 2011, 12:50 AM	#45
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	I love lume on my watches, but I wish Rolex's lume was stonger. Panerai's lume is like a freakin torch compare to my Rolexes.

20 May 2011, 12:53 AM	#46
al_bongo "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Scotland, UK Posts: 444	I don't agree with lume cheapening watches but it is utterly useless within a few minutes of putting the light out. Never mind eight or nine hours, with me eight or nine minutes is about the limit of lume. I can only imagine that tritium must have been pretty amazing by comparison - real all night long lume.

20 May 2011, 02:59 AM	#47
gypsy jim "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Jimmy Location: Kensington. Md. Watch: 168000 Posts: 281	I think it would be cool if Rolex offered a sport watch with tritium tubes like Marathon.

20 May 2011, 05:00 AM	#49
jamski "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 72	My 20-year old ExpII lost it's "lume" years ago. Perhaps that makes it more desirable?

20 May 2011, 05:21 AM	#51
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	I love the Blue & green lume on my while dial Millgauss! Not the reason why I got the watch, It's a nice to have option. my Air-King does not have any lume and I am OK with that too.

20 May 2011, 03:22 PM	#54
Megalobyte "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Ari Location: Florida Watch: ...me go broke Posts: 2,428	I've had some of the stronger lumed watches, and while I agree the older Rolexes had fairly weak Lume, not horribly but not great, the Lume on my Sub-C however is very good, it charges quickly and lasts all night. My Panerai Sub has great Lume too, perhaps slightly better, but only because they use more.

20 May 2011, 04:34 PM	#55
raph Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: USA Posts: 17	Tritium all the way... even 10yo tritium glows brighter than lume that's 5 minutes off from a full charge.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)