ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

B. Doggy · 29 June 2011, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

uhhhhhhohhhhhhhh! bwahahahahahahahahahahaha

We need MORE VOTES!! Come one COME ALL!!

Shade · 29 June 2011, 02:19 PM

Mkay I will create new login names and vote 232 multiple times lol!

topcat30093 · 29 June 2011, 09:40 PM

Based on your choices, I voted for the 190 :)

B. Doggy · 30 June 2011, 01:47 AM

To my surprise the 190 is beginning to pull ahead a bit more..

Shade · 30 June 2011, 02:06 AM

Momentary lead hehehe..

Launch Mini · 30 June 2011, 02:39 AM

I have had all three, sold the 232, kept the 190 & 249.
I did like the clean dial on the 232, but preferred the 190, bit smaller, but taller, wears a bit better, and you can't beat the smooth 8 day movement.
However, both the 190 & 249 now live in the safe, as I just don't wear either of them.
I am wearing the 98 instead. Prefer the 42mm case and features on this one.
When I get my backside in gear, I will photo them & list them for sale.

Shade · 30 June 2011, 02:45 AM

The pam 98 is an awesome watch my friend, and the unique alarm feature that is not available on other references in pam.

esm · 30 June 2011, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shade

The pam 98 is an awesome watch my friend, and the unique alarm feature that is not available on other references in pam.

Thought the alarm sound on the 98 was "too soft"

Launch Mini · 30 June 2011, 04:23 AM

The alarm is subtle during the day, but loud enough during the night to wake me up. Have a nice vibration you can feel during the day, so if you don't hear it, you feel it.

ocwatching · 30 June 2011, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Launch Mini

I have had all three, sold the 232, kept the 190 & 249.
I did like the clean dial on the 232, but preferred the 190, bit smaller, but taller, wears a bit better, and you can't beat the smooth 8 day movement.
However, both the 190 & 249 now live in the safe, as I just don't wear either of them.
I am wearing the 98 instead. Prefer the 42mm case and features on this one.
When I get my backside in gear, I will photo them & list them for sale.

John,
If I remember correctly, you had a quite a collection of PAMs.
Fallen out of love with them? You had the great pieces.

monty` · 30 June 2011, 06:45 AM

190

i'm a huge fan of sub seconds dials

yycwatchdog · 3 July 2011, 02:23 AM

I also own the 190 and I love the 8-day JLC movement. One more vote for the 190. Alan in Calgary.

ocwatching · 3 July 2011, 04:56 AM

wow..the 190 pulls ahead...
I think I have searched a whole bunch on the p.com and the 232 always wins...
weird...

B. Doggy · 3 July 2011, 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocwatching

wow..the 190 pulls ahead...
I think I have searched a whole bunch on the p.com and the 232 always wins...
weird...

The fight isn't over yet, Phil! I'm confident the 232 will take the lead....

Shade · 3 July 2011, 07:43 AM

Im with you on this one Bryan!

View Poll Results: 232 or 190?
232	17	36.96%
190	29	63.04%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

29 June 2011, 02:19 PM	#32
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Mkay I will create new login names and vote 232 multiple times lol! __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

29 June 2011, 09:40 PM	#33
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,459	Based on your choices, I voted for the 190 :) __________________

30 June 2011, 01:47 AM	#34
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	To my surprise the 190 is beginning to pull ahead a bit more.. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

30 June 2011, 02:06 AM	#35
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Momentary lead hehehe.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

30 June 2011, 02:39 AM	#36
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	I have had all three, sold the 232, kept the 190 & 249. I did like the clean dial on the 232, but preferred the 190, bit smaller, but taller, wears a bit better, and you can't beat the smooth 8 day movement. However, both the 190 & 249 now live in the safe, as I just don't wear either of them. I am wearing the 98 instead. Prefer the 42mm case and features on this one. When I get my backside in gear, I will photo them & list them for sale. __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

30 June 2011, 02:45 AM	#37
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	The pam 98 is an awesome watch my friend, and the unique alarm feature that is not available on other references in pam. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

30 June 2011, 04:23 AM	#39
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	The alarm is subtle during the day, but loud enough during the night to wake me up. Have a nice vibration you can feel during the day, so if you don't hear it, you feel it. __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

30 June 2011, 06:45 AM	#41
monty` Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 30	190 i'm a huge fan of sub seconds dials

3 July 2011, 02:23 AM	#42
yycwatchdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Calgary, Alberta Posts: 1	I also own the 190 and I love the 8-day JLC movement. One more vote for the 190. Alan in Calgary.

3 July 2011, 04:56 AM	#43
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	wow..the 190 pulls ahead... I think I have searched a whole bunch on the p.com and the 232 always wins... weird... __________________ too much into watches...

3 July 2011, 07:43 AM	#45
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Im with you on this one Bryan! __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)