ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 July 2011, 10:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 152
|
the "real" mcqueen
Happened across this piece at Hodinkee...then got curious and dug up the watch on antiquorum here.
I'm sure this is old hat to some, but being newish to the vintage scene, why does the orange hand 1655 (the so-called mcqueen) command such a premium to four-line 5512s? Also, does Mcqueen's 5512 have a service dial or something? Seems it has a feet first dial in a meters first vintage case. |
1 July 2011, 10:54 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Not sure where you are getting that 1655's command premium to 4 line 5512. I can tell you that a mint gilt dial 4 line 61 5512 costs twice as much as even a mint early straight hand 1655. As for why people called 1655's Mcqueens- no idea why...Ps- Way too many variances in references to make price generalizations in vintage Rolex.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
1 July 2011, 11:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 152
|
Meant a 5512 like mcqueens. Which if I'm not mistaken is a feet-first, 4-line circa 1967 possibly with a rivet bracelet. Or perhaps the better terminology is a meters-first with the dial swapped out.
|
1 July 2011, 12:24 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
|
Quote:
|
|
1 July 2011, 12:37 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
I have a quesiton about the McQueen 5512 from 1961.....What is the S/N range for a 1961???? 3 months ago I looked at a 1.12M S/N, 4 line, 5512 in outstanding shape...all original, that was said to be a 1961 model.....is this possible? It was spectacular!!! still available and still on my grail list.
Thanks in advance for any info you can give......befor I get realy excited about this watch. |
1 July 2011, 12:55 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,641
|
Funny
that people associate the 1655 as Steve McQueen, but in my long years of collecting and learning about Rolex, I have yet seen a picture of him wearing the watch.
His 1967 5512 that was sold last year for a cool 225K even though it has a replacement feet first dial and hands ... |
2 July 2011, 07:35 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
The Heuer Monaco has a claim to the term "Steve McQueen Watch" because he wore it in a movie. The 1655 doesn't have that going for it either.
__________________
I don't wear a Rolex for other people, I wear it for me. "We're going to hell anyway, let's travel first class" -- Kaiser Chiefs |
|
2 July 2011, 08:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
I just think that mistake has been perpetuated way too long. Some dealer probably called a 1655 that long ago and newbies caught it and threw it to each other for years without any thought or knowledge.
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
2 July 2011, 09:48 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
to me the 1655 is the "freccione"
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
2 July 2011, 10:55 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
|
Quote:
|
|
4 July 2011, 09:59 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.