ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Welshwatchman · 7 July 2011, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

I'm actually surprised Paul. Didn't know you liked 'em.

I saw one on a rather nifty strap and it looked pretty darned impressive, Mik.

Nearly bought one for list less $750 (back when MRSP was "sensible"), desperate seller.

Nearly ...

toph · 7 July 2011, 11:08 AM

if you have a PAM keep the rolex. I sold 2 rolex to get two PAMs ( in a a year or 2) and sold tehm both and have gone back to 2 rolex and others.

landroverking · 7 July 2011, 12:52 PM

No

LinusSS · 7 July 2011, 01:21 PM

Keep the rolex...

α-ψ! · 8 July 2011, 04:30 AM

Save money and buy 000 in the future!

mocheen · 8 July 2011, 01:57 PM

I would not trade my sub for a PAM. I think you would be better off saving for the PAM 000 and having both watches.

MDUB · 9 July 2011, 03:00 AM

The Sub stays and will be accompanied by a 0 soon enough.

topcat30093 · 9 July 2011, 03:51 AM

In a word NO!

Though I am a recent convert to Panerai and have in the past owned a couple of Subs.

To me a Rolex submariner is an all time classic watch.

And the pedigree of a Sub is virtually unrivalled.

Keep it and if you are still dedicated to buying a Pam 0 then save up for it.

Regards
Tony

samcro · 14 July 2011, 10:09 AM

No way.

rolexsweep · 14 July 2011, 02:59 PM

In the same boat, though I am saving up for the zero, no way In hell would I sell my rolex

skyedog · 14 July 2011, 03:48 PM

No.

7 July 2011, 11:08 AM	#32
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	if you have a PAM keep the rolex. I sold 2 rolex to get two PAMs ( in a a year or 2) and sold tehm both and have gone back to 2 rolex and others. __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

7 July 2011, 01:21 PM	#34
LinusSS "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Chicago Posts: 17	Keep the rolex... __________________ Rolex SS DJ 16200 serial U Breitling Chronomat

9 July 2011, 03:00 AM	#37
MDUB Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Marc Location: SoCal Posts: 65	Thanks again for all of your opinions. The Sub stays and will be accompanied by a 0 soon enough.

9 July 2011, 03:51 AM	#38
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,459	In a word NO! Though I am a recent convert to Panerai and have in the past owned a couple of Subs. To me a Rolex submariner is an all time classic watch. And the pedigree of a Sub is virtually unrivalled. Keep it and if you are still dedicated to buying a Pam 0 then save up for it. Regards Tony __________________

14 July 2011, 02:59 PM	#40
rolexsweep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Australia Watch: RG DD40 Posts: 1,149	In the same boat, though I am saving up for the zero, no way In hell would I sell my rolex __________________ "Did you get that at retail?"

7 July 2011, 12:52 PM	#33
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	No

8 July 2011, 04:30 AM	#35
α-ψ! "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: tolis Location: athens Watch: daytona tt Posts: 194	Save money and buy 000 in the future!

8 July 2011, 01:57 PM	#36
mocheen "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Aaron Location: San Francisco Watch: 16610LV Posts: 187	I would not trade my sub for a PAM. I think you would be better off saving for the PAM 000 and having both watches.

14 July 2011, 10:09 AM	#39
samcro "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: kansas city Posts: 16	No way.

14 July 2011, 03:48 PM	#41
skyedog "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Joey Location: around the Bay Watch: ing TRF Posts: 1,942	No.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)