ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Speed · 27 July 2011, 12:23 AM

Sounds like you are all over the map! Not to worry. Not unusual.

These are mass produced watches. Not shares of Apple stock.

You dont sound like a diver or frequent traveller so just Buy the one you would like
to wear most.

Ye olde coin toss-after trying them on- might work.

Caraptor · 27 July 2011, 12:24 AM

If it really is a toss-up in terms of functionality, then I would go with the Sub. It's the more familiar model to non-WIS, it will always be popular, and should hold its value well. Submariner is almost a brand name in and of itself, and you should be able to bank on it for a long time to come.

TimeOnHand · 27 July 2011, 12:30 AM

Both great watches. Both hold their value over time.

Since I only have the GMT it gets my vote!

ManUtd · 27 July 2011, 12:31 AM

Get both if you can afford it. They are really beautiful watches. If you must pick one you really need to try them on at an AD. While they look similar from afar the design differences are significant when you see both up close. These design differences would likely lead to your decision. Asking for peoples choices here would only get you more confused. That's my 2 cents.

MortgageGuy · 27 July 2011, 01:28 AM

As said they are both amazing watches, I own both of them but my vote goes for the GMT, I love the bezel for whatever that is worth. Good luck with your decision

dooder202 · 27 July 2011, 01:29 AM

Go for the GMT. I actually really like the PCL's, and the business of the bezel! The green hand and text on the dial set's it apart too.

esm · 27 July 2011, 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomo1984

I Want BOTH :-/

Cant blame you for saying that really..

Rollie2011 · 27 July 2011, 02:47 AM

Personally, i could never justify the purchase of both. They are just too similar.

If i were you, I'd go with the GMT IIc. It is seen far less in the wild and really is a top notch piece

SteKos · 27 July 2011, 02:50 AM

If you NEED the 2nd/3rd time-zone function, get the GMT. If you don't, get the Sub.

My reasoning - the Sub is a slightly better daily watch, better water resistance, simpler movement, etc.

HDHNTER · 27 July 2011, 02:56 AM

Both are superb, can't go wrong with either but I prefer the slightly more under the radar appeal of the Sub.

DiamondJack · 27 July 2011, 03:24 AM

I have both and would comment as follows;

The Sub is an all time ,great looking, classic and will be recognised by most of the people you will ever meet. But its a divers watch with limited functionality other than a time lapse bezel.

The GMTIIc is the most useful (mechanical) watch I have ever owned and I regularly use all the functions when travelling or tracking other time zones during a typical business day. The ability to independently change the hour hand without stopping the watch when moving between time zones is an incredible feature and saves you the effort of resetting the watch everytime ......but you need to travel to make full use of the features.

Either way....you can't go wrong

Tomo1984 · 27 July 2011, 05:10 AM

Thanks for all the good advice guys.!!
Upto now im gona side with the Subc!!
I Will defo try both on over the wkend then decide!!
Also I will see how much i can get each for!!

Caraptor · 27 July 2011, 05:27 AM

Post some pics when you've finished shopping!

TSW · 27 July 2011, 05:29 AM

Can't go wrong with either one!
My favorite is the Sub though.

Tomo1984 · 27 July 2011, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caraptor

Post some pics when you've finished shopping!

will do dont worry

The Archer · 27 July 2011, 05:43 AM

I like the GMT more, just because I would actually use its features. I never swim when I am wearing a watch. But both are great choices, Can't go wrong with either! The GMT has Polished Center Links, so that may influence your decision. Some don't like PCL's, I love them on the other hand. Welcome to TRF!

Tomo1984 · 27 July 2011, 05:47 AM

I also like the PCL's.
It is just far 2 difficult to pick

warren G. · 27 July 2011, 05:51 AM

Get the Sub-C.

The Archer · 27 July 2011, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomo1984

I also like the PCL's.
It is just far 2 difficult to pick

In these cases, I would recommend you the age old Coin Toss. Also, there have been poorly made GMT Master IIC Bracelets about four years ago, so try to pick up a current GMT. I am not aware if the Sub had the same problems.

Not trying to scare you off, just laying the facts on the table.

Welcome to TRF!

Ski Dweller · 27 July 2011, 07:49 AM

If you travel by air a lot, get the GMT. IF you like the water, get the Sub.

Sherwooddavid · 27 July 2011, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nauticajoe

Both great watches to own as a 1st. Can't go wrong with either.

I'd lean towards the SubC.

Good luck!

I agree with Joe 100%

spuds · 27 July 2011, 08:40 AM

I have both......

GMTc's dressier (IMO) due to the PCL's but the cSub's clasp makes me all tingly just playing with it!

You really can't go wrong with either mate.

cedargrove · 27 July 2011, 11:19 AM

Both great watches, and you can't go wrong with either.

Sub is more iconic, GMT a little more functionality.

East Bay Rider · 27 July 2011, 11:42 AM

I don't know too many sub owners who are routinely exceeding the dive rating of a GMT so IMO there's simply more functionality with the GMT.

numbsy · 29 July 2011, 12:54 AM

For me its pcls vs no pcls.
If this is going to be your everyday watch get the sub.
If this is going to be a weekend watch get the gmt.

My 2cents :)

tkc324 · 29 July 2011, 01:00 AM

Flip a coin.

ersnyder · 29 July 2011, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

Cant blame you for saying that really..

VERY nice shot!

Of course, you can't go wrong with either one. But IMO if you want "unique" go with the GMT; if the most popular is important, go with the Sub.

27 July 2011, 12:30 AM	#33
TimeOnHand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Hong Kong Watch: Rolex Air-King Posts: 4,468	Both great watches. Both hold their value over time. Since I only have the GMT it gets my vote! __________________ Instagram: timeonhand1010

27 July 2011, 12:31 AM	#34
ManUtd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 1,613	Get both if you can afford it. They are really beautiful watches. If you must pick one you really need to try them on at an AD. While they look similar from afar the design differences are significant when you see both up close. These design differences would likely lead to your decision. Asking for peoples choices here would only get you more confused. That's my 2 cents. __________________ 116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986

27 July 2011, 01:28 AM	#35
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	As said they are both amazing watches, I own both of them but my vote goes for the GMT, I love the bezel for whatever that is worth. Good luck with your decision __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

27 July 2011, 02:50 AM	#39
SteKos Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 150	My opinion If you NEED the 2nd/3rd time-zone function, get the GMT. If you don't, get the Sub. My reasoning - the Sub is a slightly better daily watch, better water resistance, simpler movement, etc.

27 July 2011, 05:29 AM	#44
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Can't go wrong with either one! My favorite is the Sub though. __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

27 July 2011, 12:23 AM	#31
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	Sounds like you are all over the map! Not to worry. Not unusual. These are mass produced watches. Not shares of Apple stock. You dont sound like a diver or frequent traveller so just Buy the one you would like to wear most. Ye olde coin toss-after trying them on- might work.

27 July 2011, 12:24 AM	#32
Caraptor Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: me save for it. Posts: 444	If it really is a toss-up in terms of functionality, then I would go with the Sub. It's the more familiar model to non-WIS, it will always be popular, and should hold its value well. Submariner is almost a brand name in and of itself, and you should be able to bank on it for a long time to come.

27 July 2011, 01:29 AM	#36
dooder202 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Eric Location: US Watch: DateJust Posts: 1,468	Go for the GMT. I actually really like the PCL's, and the business of the bezel! The green hand and text on the dial set's it apart too.

27 July 2011, 02:47 AM	#38
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	Personally, i could never justify the purchase of both. They are just too similar. If i were you, I'd go with the GMT IIc. It is seen far less in the wild and really is a top notch piece

27 July 2011, 02:56 AM	#40
HDHNTER "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Allen Location: SC Posts: 2,766	Both are superb, can't go wrong with either but I prefer the slightly more under the radar appeal of the Sub.

27 July 2011, 03:24 AM	#41
DiamondJack "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: London Watch: Quite a few Posts: 4,315	I have both and would comment as follows; The Sub is an all time ,great looking, classic and will be recognised by most of the people you will ever meet. But its a divers watch with limited functionality other than a time lapse bezel. The GMTIIc is the most useful (mechanical) watch I have ever owned and I regularly use all the functions when travelling or tracking other time zones during a typical business day. The ability to independently change the hour hand without stopping the watch when moving between time zones is an incredible feature and saves you the effort of resetting the watch everytime ......but you need to travel to make full use of the features. Either way....you can't go wrong

27 July 2011, 05:10 AM	#42
Tomo1984 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Cheshire Posts: 35	Thanks for all the good advice guys.!! Upto now im gona side with the Subc!! I Will defo try both on over the wkend then decide!! Also I will see how much i can get each for!!

27 July 2011, 05:27 AM	#43
Caraptor Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: me save for it. Posts: 444	Post some pics when you've finished shopping!

27 July 2011, 05:43 AM	#46
The Archer Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Adam Location: Texas Watch: G-Shock! Posts: 383	I like the GMT more, just because I would actually use its features. I never swim when I am wearing a watch. But both are great choices, Can't go wrong with either! The GMT has Polished Center Links, so that may influence your decision. Some don't like PCL's, I love them on the other hand. Welcome to TRF!

27 July 2011, 05:47 AM	#47
Tomo1984 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Cheshire Posts: 35	I also like the PCL's. It is just far 2 difficult to pick

27 July 2011, 05:51 AM	#48
warren G. "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Duy Location: New Orleans, LA Watch: Speedmaster 3861 Posts: 1,925	Get the Sub-C. __________________ De gustibus non est disputandum.

27 July 2011, 07:49 AM	#50
Ski Dweller Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Aspen, CO Watch: Swatch KikiPicasso Posts: 266	If you travel by air a lot, get the GMT. IF you like the water, get the Sub.

27 July 2011, 08:40 AM	#52
spuds "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Dan Location: Essex, UK Watch: West Ham! COYI!! Posts: 7,941	I have both...... GMTc's dressier (IMO) due to the PCL's but the cSub's clasp makes me all tingly just playing with it! You really can't go wrong with either mate. __________________ Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010

27 July 2011, 11:19 AM	#53
cedargrove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: Canada Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc Posts: 3,013	Both great watches, and you can't go wrong with either. Sub is more iconic, GMT a little more functionality.

27 July 2011, 11:42 AM	#54
East Bay Rider "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: East Bay RI Watch: GMT-II 16710LN Posts: 12,073	I don't know too many sub owners who are routinely exceeding the dive rating of a GMT so IMO there's simply more functionality with the GMT. __________________ I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46

29 July 2011, 12:54 AM	#55
numbsy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: vit Location: canada Watch: 116613 & 16710 Posts: 102	For me its pcls vs no pcls. If this is going to be your everyday watch get the sub. If this is going to be a weekend watch get the gmt. My 2cents :)

29 July 2011, 01:00 AM	#56
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	Flip a coin.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)