ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

HDHNTER · 21 August 2011, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgoose1

I've stated many times that the 16610/LV arguably is the finest Rolex Submariner of all time. Now with that stated, I would not trade/sell a new Sub/C for a classic LV, nor would I sell an LV to fund a Sub/C. They both stand on their own; the classic has been there--done that as a pioneering tool watch for decades, the sequel product is the benefactor of all the heavy lifting and will never really have to prove itself. They are both great watches to have, if I had to pick between the two, it would be one or the other!

Rollie2011 · 21 August 2011, 10:18 AM

No way in hell. Stick with the Sub-C

mjm800 · 21 August 2011, 10:50 AM

I'd do it...you'll have cash to spare as well. I'm not a fan at all of the ceramic bezel so of course I say go for it.

ncj · 21 August 2011, 12:24 PM

I just can't get over the squared look of the new subs. Sorry, but not a fan.

21 August 2011, 10:50 AM	#3
mjm800 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 1,950	I'd do it...you'll have cash to spare as well. I'm not a fan at all of the ceramic bezel so of course I say go for it. __________________

21 August 2011, 12:24 PM	#4
ncj "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: USA Watch: Sea Dweller 16600 Posts: 63	I just can't get over the squared look of the new subs. Sorry, but not a fan. __________________ My second career after retiring from medicine. Sea-Dweller 16600 Suunto Observer Omega Seamaster (Titanium with Electric Blue Dial) - now sold.

21 August 2011, 10:18 AM	#2
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	No way in hell. Stick with the Sub-C

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)