The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 October 2011, 12:35 AM   #31
Fiddy
"TRF" Member
 
Fiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Asia
Watch: PP AP PAM ROLEX
Posts: 495
my first PAM was 241. I worn it for 2 years and I needed something bigger.
After 241, 359 was the only automatic Panerai.
I think manual movement is CLASSIC.

I think 111/112/000/005 are the best to start.
Price in secondary market is quite fair.

BTW, congrats in advance.
Fiddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2011, 06:09 AM   #32
dgr8dude
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
005 all the way!
dgr8dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2011, 06:49 AM   #33
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgr8dude View Post
005 all the way!
Does the 005 have the sandwich dail?
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2011, 06:56 AM   #34
dgr8dude
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
nope....sausage dial :)
dgr8dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2011, 06:56 AM   #35
dgr8dude
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
cheaper than the 111 too...
dgr8dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2011, 11:17 AM   #36
andrew79
"TRF" Member
 
andrew79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
Mine was 000, then switched to 111 in just a week time... it really depends on what type sings to you louder....
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera
Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570
Panerai 111 , 232
andrew79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2011, 12:44 PM   #37
runs_wscissors
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DC
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicismith View Post
im going crazy deciding between the explorer2, gmt, and pam 111, 112 and 183,210...
I am so in this boat too... I've been lurking and browsing for 2 months now. I like the 210, 177 and the 312/359, which I realize covers a lot of different styles and price ranges. The look of the leather band is more appealing to my significant other, who wants to help me get my first mechanical watch. I want to wear and not worry so I keep going back to the 16570 explorer II. I don't know how you guys do it, but $5000 is my limit and that itself can buy a lot of other fun and useful things. It's been an enjoyable learning curve and as a mech. eng. I really appreciate the function aspect of these pieces.
runs_wscissors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2011, 09:19 PM   #38
bicismith
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
On Thursday, I went to a few stores and tried on every rolex and panerai I could find. Since before purchasing the pam104 a few months ago I had originally intended on getting a rolex, and thought I'd finally go this route.

FYI, I sold the pam104 earlier this week.

But after owning the panerai I could not get past the busy dial and overall small appearance of the Rolexes and the cyclops, while better than the panerai, still detracted from the overall appearance of the watch, imo.

So I decided to get a panerai. After trying on quite a few the radiomir was my favorite. It's much more comfortable and lighter weight on my wrist than the pam104 was, and I still thought the luminor manual winds were a bit bulky to my liking. they were better than the automatic pam104 though.

Yesterday a fellow paneristi offered first class service and delivered me a brand new 380N to my door, and he surprised me with a Panerai T-shirt as an added bonus.

The first winding was a joy, and I'm glad I went with the manual.

Here's a poor photo from a bar last night:

bicismith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 01:12 PM   #39
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
First was a 111G and its still here in the family!


red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 02:07 PM   #40
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicismith View Post
On Thursday, I went to a few stores and tried on every rolex and panerai I could find. Since before purchasing the pam104 a few months ago I had originally intended on getting a rolex, and thought I'd finally go this route.

FYI, I sold the pam104 earlier this week.

But after owning the panerai I could not get past the busy dial and overall small appearance of the Rolexes and the cyclops, while better than the panerai, still detracted from the overall appearance of the watch, imo.

So I decided to get a panerai. After trying on quite a few the radiomir was my favorite. It's much more comfortable and lighter weight on my wrist than the pam104 was, and I still thought the luminor manual winds were a bit bulky to my liking. they were better than the automatic pam104 though.

Yesterday a fellow paneristi offered first class service and delivered me a brand new 380N to my door, and he surprised me with a Panerai T-shirt as an added bonus.

The first winding was a joy, and I'm glad I went with the manual.

Here's a poor photo from a bar last night:

Great photo! It's always good to have few drinks after you get a watch to brake it in
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 02:08 PM   #41
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by red1108nyc View Post
First was a 111G and its still here in the family!


Nice!
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 06:05 PM   #42
Ultraman
"TRF" Member
 
Ultraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,175
Another noob question on PAMs..

With PAMs serial (eg: J, K, N), how can I differentiate the year they are manufacture? Do they vary in prices as well?
Ultraman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 10:46 PM   #43
bicismith
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultraman View Post
Another noob question on PAMs..

With PAMs serial (eg: J, K, N), how can I differentiate the year they are manufacture? Do they vary in prices as well?

Year Designator
Panerai watches are dated by a letter that appears before the production number.

No Letter - 1997
A - 1998
B - 1999
C - 2000
D - 2001
E - 2002
F - 2003
G - 2004
H - 2005
I - 2006
J - 2007
K - 2008
L - 2009
M - 2010
N - 2011
bicismith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 10:48 PM   #44
Ultraman
"TRF" Member
 
Ultraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicismith View Post
Year Designator
Panerai watches are dated by a letter that appears before the production number.

No Letter - 1997
A - 1998
B - 1999
C - 2000
D - 2001
E - 2002
F - 2003
G - 2004
H - 2005
I - 2006
J - 2007
K - 2008
L - 2009
M - 2010
N - 2011
Thanks mate!
Ultraman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2011, 11:40 PM   #45
ExpII
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: chris
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: Milgauss, PAM 359
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric23 View Post
That sounds like a crazy road you went down.

Maybe I should stick with Rolex I only flipped 2 watches in over 4 years.

I do like the Pam Subs too (24&25).
The PAM 24 is a sweet watch.
ExpII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2011, 10:13 AM   #46
runs_wscissors
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DC
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicismith View Post
F - 2003
G - 2004
H - 2005
I - 2006
J - 2007
K - 2008
L - 2009
M - 2010
N - 2011
Hey, those letters are in ORDER! What fun is it trying to figure out if V is older than M or Z?
runs_wscissors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:05 AM   #47
timlaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: Worcestershire,UK
Watch: Coke 16710
Posts: 894
I agree that trying all models on is vital. I bought a 49 as my first PAM 4 years ago and still looks as good as the day I bought it. I think the 40mm luminor wears bigger than 40mm due to the crown protector. any choice is a good one tho.

timlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:08 AM   #48
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
I went with the 210, I am liking it!
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:22 AM   #49
barstoolman
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric23 View Post
If I was you I would get a Rolex, if you don't have one. They are the best watch for the price but that is just me.
Have you seen their list prices lately????? They are hardly the best watch for the price nowadays. Love them still but new ones from an AD are at prices I just won't pay.....just my .02
barstoolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:40 AM   #50
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by barstoolman View Post
Have you seen their list prices lately????? They are hardly the best watch for the price nowadays. Love them still but new ones from an AD are at prices I just won't pay.....just my .02
Same can be said for almost every luxury/high end brands at the ADs.
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:46 AM   #51
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by barstoolman View Post
Have you seen their list prices lately????? They are hardly the best watch for the price nowadays. Love them still but new ones from an AD are at prices I just won't pay.....just my .02
That is true, but most AD's will give a high discount on Rolex, not that much on Panerai.

I love them both and now have both, but I would say first high-end watch should be a Rolex. but that is just me.
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.