|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: LV Sub or original Sea Dweller? (Both brand new) | |||
| LV Sub |
   
|
92 | 41.44% |
| Original Sea Dweller |
  
|
130 | 58.56% |
| Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27 May 2010, 01:57 PM
|
#61 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
|
Quote:
 I got my LV before I got my SD. I go back and forth on which one I like more. The LV seems a bit more rare, but the SD is as well when compared to a regular Sub. Getting a black insert for the LV will give you a taste of both worlds. I really cant say....just get both.... 
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2011, 09:57 AM
|
#62 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12 November 2011, 06:35 AM
|
#63 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 116610GLB?
Posts: 210
|
lv for sure
|
|
|
|
|
13 November 2011, 06:10 AM
|
#64 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
after some consideration in my same dilemma...
the lugholes only available on the SD might be the tie breaker.... such a close list of pros and cons. anyone else think the same?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
