ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 November 2011, 05:19 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
Submariner pet peeve
Why is it Rolex refers to the Submariner without a date complication as " Submariner " and the Submariner with a date complication as the "Submariner Date" but most Rolex owners with the date complication Submariners refer to their watches as " Submariner/Sub" and use the somewhat disparaging term "Submariner NO Date/Sub NO date" for the actual "Submariner"? The Original had no date complication, so what gives, if the terminology is good enough for Rolex why is not good enough for the majority of Submariner Date owners themselves ?
http://www.rolex.com/en#/rolex-watch...l-m14060m-0004 |
26 November 2011, 05:21 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
|
I calls it a "Submareener-Date" sans - the silly cycloptic sapphire bubble thingy
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
|
26 November 2011, 05:21 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 896
|
I agree. I have wondered this myself from time to time.
|
26 November 2011, 05:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
|
The original is the Submariner... The one with added date is the Submariner Date...
That is all there is to it...
__________________
Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers.. |
26 November 2011, 05:27 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
Quote:
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
|
26 November 2011, 05:30 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 211
|
I'd rather that that hearing them called "Rollies, Bluesy, The Hulk, Kermit, etc, etc."
|
26 November 2011, 05:54 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
|
26 November 2011, 06:09 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
I know I'm a pretty complacent guy but it irks me .Submariner Date owners use that Sub No-date as a negative term like the "Submariner" is missing something ,when in fact its just the opposite, the Date complication really is just a gimicky add on. If its good enough for Rolex then it should be good enough for the Daters themselves.Sub Date ..Sub No Date it is even easier to use the proper terminology.This Anarchy must be stopped or what's next Explorer No Date .
|
26 November 2011, 06:17 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
Yes, according to the Italians.
It is Sub-marine-er So, as long as we know which is what? No problems from me.
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
26 November 2011, 06:34 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
I own one and refer to it as a "no-date", I'm going to just start saying "sub" and for what it's worth, I never miss having a date on that watch, I'm just so happy wearing it, that's enough
|
26 November 2011, 06:45 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Quote:
But I don't want to stop.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
26 November 2011, 06:46 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK. Lancaster
Watch: Submariner 2003
Posts: 102
|
I often wondered why a diver would need to know the date.
How much air is left may prove more helpful. |
26 November 2011, 06:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
|
26 November 2011, 06:58 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: Florida
Watch: No-date Sub
Posts: 289
|
My watch, can call it any name I want!!!
|
26 November 2011, 07:01 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Kelly
Location: In the Bluegrass
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 550
|
I say it too, but dont know why! I'll try to do better. I promise!!
__________________
SubC 116610LN, DJ 16014, GMT16750 pepsi Matte, Explorer II 16570 Polar V, Sea Dweller 16600, Sub 14060 More to come! "Too many watches, too little time"! |
26 November 2011, 07:04 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
PS: you need an amendment. "Master II, Sub w/no date, Explore II w/Black Dial, Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph Diver, Breitling Evolution, Navitimer Heritage, Old Navitiner II TT" |
|
26 November 2011, 07:09 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
|
26 November 2011, 07:23 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
I have a 14060M, and have never found the term Sub No Date to be negative. I prefer the watch to the version with the date, so I always thought they were pointing out its superiority!
__________________
|
26 November 2011, 07:29 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
+1
__________________
|
26 November 2011, 08:20 AM | #20 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Some of us don't..
The Sub is a Sub and has been around since 1953 The Sub-Date is a completely different watch..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
26 November 2011, 08:27 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Majority rules and there are a lot more of us than you. So tough luck! (lol jk!)
|
26 November 2011, 08:30 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Seriously I think it really does have to do with the fact there are a lot more date models sold, and they are all a version of submariner. So I will refer to my watch as a sub or submariner for simplicity sake, not to try to force anyone else to call theirs a sub no date.
|
26 November 2011, 08:31 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
|
26 November 2011, 08:33 AM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Quote:
|
|
26 November 2011, 08:40 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
I say potato you say tomato,so what.
|
26 November 2011, 08:52 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
|
26 November 2011, 08:53 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
There are just no pleasing people these days....
I try to quite the reference number as much as I can... Can't really get wrong with it right?!? 16610 116610LV 116713LN 116520 116433 No?!? |
26 November 2011, 09:00 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
|
Perfect, Eric !
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
|
26 November 2011, 09:01 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
|
26 November 2011, 09:18 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Watch: Sub C LV,
Posts: 490
|
Someone is picking fly dung out of pepper. They are all Submariners or Subs.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.