ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
6 January 2012, 02:05 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: WHITE ROCK BC
Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914,
Posts: 897
|
|
6 January 2012, 02:36 AM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
No way and you will never get a Sub for as good of a deal as the one you have...
Price goes up and up and up...every year. |
6 January 2012, 03:12 AM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
I wouldn't part with the Sub.
I'd just start putting money away for the Heritage.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
6 January 2012, 03:13 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
No!
|
6 January 2012, 03:29 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
keep the Sub!
|
6 January 2012, 03:33 AM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Nope. More money, yup.
|
6 January 2012, 03:51 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
I wouldn't
|
6 January 2012, 12:04 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Danny
Location: georgia
Watch: it Bub
Posts: 1,334
|
Wow.. THe Heritage is on my short list of wants so this is a tough decision..
If the Sub and bracelet are in good condition, I probably would not. Now if it were a Monte Carlo.. I would consider for even a newer Sub.. |
6 January 2012, 12:06 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: TC
Location: GMT -8
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 582
|
nope
__________________
Tudor Submariner 76100/Rolex TT Submariner Blue X/Victorinox AirBoss Mach 6/Longines Grande Vitesse/Rolex SeaDweller DeepSea V/ GShock GW-3000B/ Tudor Prince Date 74034/ Rolex ExII 42 WD/ Rolex Submariner 116610 LV/ Tudor Pelagos Blue |
6 January 2012, 02:25 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
Sub for me, I also would save up for the Tudor but keep the Sub or perhaps save for a Sub c and flip the current sub........ Decisions decisions...
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
6 January 2012, 02:45 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Too many to narrow
Posts: 585
|
Wow seems like a unanimous vote!
I do love my sub very very much... Although I still think the Tudor is quite the looker... A few side by sides I found on the net: |
6 January 2012, 03:07 PM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,369
|
That's not something I would do.
|
6 January 2012, 03:27 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Arthur
Location: Manila
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 278
|
I love Tudors, but in this case I wouldn't do the trade. I tried the Heritage and it wears too big for me, diameter-wise and thickness-wise. It will wear very different from your sub. But that's on my 6.5" wrist.
|
6 January 2012, 03:54 PM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Too many to narrow
Posts: 585
|
Quote:
|
|
6 January 2012, 06:16 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Arthur
Location: Manila
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 278
|
Looks like you're sold on the THC...do what you have to do and go for it.
|
6 January 2012, 08:06 PM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
I wouldn't.
But if you prefer the Heritage go for it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.