ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

polarinda · 7 March 2012, 02:59 PM

got a chance to trade my remaining moonwatch+bond watch for a 14060 with box and paper with no top ups from either side.

Would you do it? I already have a 16750 and thinking the 14060 would be the last watch I'll ever get.

but than they say, never say ever....

PS: i paid near $3k USD for the mw+sm.

Kringkily · 7 March 2012, 03:03 PM

Depending on condition and year of your MW it could either be a good or below average trade but that is also depending on serial and condition of the 14060. Trade seems reasonable.

Andad · 7 March 2012, 05:27 PM

....Rolex Forum hat......

14060 of course.

The others are Omegas.

brettpaul · 7 March 2012, 05:43 PM

Good trade depending on the condition of the 14060...is it a non-COSC or with COSC?

gwalker · 7 March 2012, 06:15 PM

I would keep the omegas. I don't care for the ND sub.

Andad · 7 March 2012, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brettpaul

Good trade depending on the condition of the 14060...is it a non-COSC or with COSC?

Based on that Omega price point I'd say non-cosc.
Around a 'K'?

Len · 7 March 2012, 07:13 PM

If you paid 3K for the Omegas then trade for the 14060... I had an Omega 2254.50.00 and sold it and bought the 14060M. I have never had regrets...

travisb · 7 March 2012, 07:18 PM

As long as you don't think you'll miss your Omegas.

wokafu · 7 March 2012, 07:25 PM

as much as i love the iconic 14060...i wont trade in the other 2 icon...

polarinda · 7 March 2012, 08:05 PM

14060 non cosc. N series. Tritium.

Adam K. · 7 March 2012, 08:15 PM

Any 14060 Submariner with the 3130 movement (meaning: 14060M)...2-line, 4-line, doesn't matter. Same excellent caliber with Breguet hairspring, full balance bridge, and all the Rolex-baked goodies. As to whether the dial says "chronometer" or not, that's all up to you and your preferences--either way, its the last interpretation of the classic Submariner you, I, or anyone will likely ever see. A great performer, a classic design that will be cool decades from now, and a solid buy at the right price.

Get a 14060M while you can!

dddrees · 7 March 2012, 10:14 PM

Personally I would have a problem trading the Speedmaster Pro. If I could trade the Bond watch and cash for the Sub that's what I would do.

dsio · 7 March 2012, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Personally I would have a problem trading the Speedmaster Pro. If I could trade the Bond watch and cash for the Sub that's what I would do.

This ^

nick c · 7 March 2012, 10:48 PM

14060 for me

powerfunk · 7 March 2012, 11:11 PM

As long as the Speedy isn't a 105.012, go for the 14060m!

Hansch99 · 8 March 2012, 12:13 AM

That's a tough one, and I've been in your shoes. While I like the 14060 better than both the Speedmaster and Bond Seamaster combined, I'd be reluctant to do the trade unless the Rolex had recently been serviced. If you have to turn around and service it right away, it doesn't seem like a great deal to me.

snowbird · 8 March 2012, 12:21 AM

If it were me I'd rather keep the two Omegas, especially the moon watch.

mjclark32 · 8 March 2012, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Personally I would have a problem trading the Speedmaster Pro. If I could trade the Bond watch and cash for the Sub that's what I would do.

Good call

7 March 2012, 02:59 PM	#1
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	14060 or Speedmaster+seamaster? got a chance to trade my remaining moonwatch+bond watch for a 14060 with box and paper with no top ups from either side. Would you do it? I already have a 16750 and thinking the 14060 would be the last watch I'll ever get. but than they say, never say ever.... PS: i paid near $3k USD for the mw+sm.

7 March 2012, 05:27 PM	#3
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,533	....Rolex Forum hat...... 14060 of course. The others are Omegas. __________________ E

7 March 2012, 07:18 PM	#8
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	I'd do it. As long as you don't think you'll miss your Omegas.

7 March 2012, 10:14 PM	#12
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	Personally I would have a problem trading the Speedmaster Pro. If I could trade the Bond watch and cash for the Sub that's what I would do. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

7 March 2012, 03:03 PM	#2
Kringkily "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: George Location: New York Watch: Speedmaster, Rolex Posts: 3,082	Depending on condition and year of your MW it could either be a good or below average trade but that is also depending on serial and condition of the 14060. Trade seems reasonable.

7 March 2012, 05:43 PM	#4
brettpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Brett Location: Bahrain, Dubai Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 5,538	Good trade depending on the condition of the 14060...is it a non-COSC or with COSC?

7 March 2012, 06:15 PM	#5
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	I would keep the omegas. I don't care for the ND sub.

7 March 2012, 07:13 PM	#7
Len "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Hans Henrik Location: EU, Denmark Posts: 184	If you paid 3K for the Omegas then trade for the 14060... I had an Omega 2254.50.00 and sold it and bought the 14060M. I have never had regrets...

7 March 2012, 07:25 PM	#9
wokafu "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Malaysia Watch: SM300+14060M Posts: 2,012	as much as i love the iconic 14060...i wont trade in the other 2 icon...

7 March 2012, 08:05 PM	#10
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	14060 non cosc. N series. Tritium.

7 March 2012, 08:15 PM	#11
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	Any 14060 Submariner with the 3130 movement (meaning: 14060M)...2-line, 4-line, doesn't matter. Same excellent caliber with Breguet hairspring, full balance bridge, and all the Rolex-baked goodies. As to whether the dial says "chronometer" or not, that's all up to you and your preferences--either way, its the last interpretation of the classic Submariner you, I, or anyone will likely ever see. A great performer, a classic design that will be cool decades from now, and a solid buy at the right price. Get a 14060M while you can!

7 March 2012, 10:48 PM	#14
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	14060 for me

7 March 2012, 11:11 PM	#15
powerfunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Rob Location: Boston, MA Watch: 1530 Posts: 3,799	As long as the Speedy isn't a 105.012, go for the 14060m!

8 March 2012, 12:13 AM	#16
Hansch99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: USA Watch: 14060M, 116200 Posts: 318	That's a tough one, and I've been in your shoes. While I like the 14060 better than both the Speedmaster and Bond Seamaster combined, I'd be reluctant to do the trade unless the Rolex had recently been serviced. If you have to turn around and service it right away, it doesn't seem like a great deal to me.

8 March 2012, 12:21 AM	#17
snowbird "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: USA Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 2,157	If it were me I'd rather keep the two Omegas, especially the moon watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)