ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

warren G. · 13 March 2012, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtrunner

Keep clicking on it as well out of habit.

same here...

threemonkeys · 13 March 2012, 09:10 AM

It's kind of thrown me off a bit. Maybe I need a life, though. Come to think of it, maybe we all need a life other than TRF.

Hahaha - totally kidding folks. I'm addicted and I know it. I'll see you kids on TRF.

ng3l1 · 13 March 2012, 09:56 AM

Same here when i click everything look so different

JustABreathAway · 13 March 2012, 09:59 AM

I must say that I respectfully disagree with this decision. First, the caveat that I appreciate all of the hard work of the moderators and administrators making this a wonderful site. I also do not quarrel lightly with such powerful individuals, I see no need to risk unnecessary loss of privilege.

However, the bulk of traffic on this site certainly seems to be focused on the Rolex General Discussion board. I think, based on this, it rightly should be the first forum available on the selection page. It doesn't seem right to look for inadvertent visits to the Vintage section. There are several members who appreciate the older models, but Vintage should stand on it's own as a forum of interest. The order of forums ought to be reflective of interest on the site - Rolex General Discussion at the top.

Thank you for consideration of my politely offered opinion and reasoning.

Lol-x · 13 March 2012, 10:05 AM

Thanks for your honest support

Carry on

JustABreathAway · 13 March 2012, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

Thanks for your honest support

Carry on

My heart raced a little when I saw you had replied as I was opening up the page. I thought I was going straight to TRF Hell, or maybe Purgatory!

snaggle · 13 March 2012, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

I knew someone would say that.

Well the fact of the matter is many people get a bit forgetful and just click on the 'General Discussion Forum' without giving the wonderful 'Vintage Rolex Forum' much regard. So I thought a little more prominence may remind some that we do have a great appreciation for vintage pieces and the history of Rolex.

You might say I'd like the Vintage Rolex Forum to be 'outstanding'.

I knew that was the reason!!

salem65 · 13 March 2012, 10:56 AM

This change has completely disrupted my life

horseco · 13 March 2012, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustABreathAway

I must say that I respectfully disagree with this decision. First, the caveat that I appreciate all of the hard work of the moderators and administrators making this a wonderful site. I also do not quarrel lightly with such powerful individuals, I see no need to risk unnecessary loss of privilege.

However, the bulk of traffic on this site certainly seems to be focused on the Rolex General Discussion board..

I must humbly agree...

Time2time · 13 March 2012, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nch209

I like vintage, but I like the General Discussion at the TOP, since I am so used to it being there over the past years. . . I hope it gets changed back!

X2. If it ain't broke don't fix it!!

Time2time · 13 March 2012, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustABreathAway

I must say that I respectfully disagree with this decision. First, the caveat that I appreciate all of the hard work of the moderators and administrators making this a wonderful site. I also do not quarrel lightly with such powerful individuals, I see no need to risk unnecessary loss of privilege.

However, the bulk of traffic on this site certainly seems to be focused on the Rolex General Discussion board. I think, based on this, it rightly should be the first forum available on the selection page. It doesn't seem right to look for inadvertent visits to the Vintage section. There are several members who appreciate the older models, but Vintage should stand on it's own as a forum of interest. The order of forums ought to be reflective of interest on the site - Rolex General Discussion at the top.

Thank you for consideration of my politely offered opinion and reasoning.

X2 If it ain't broke don't fix it!!

speedracer5.0 · 13 March 2012, 12:49 PM

Yeah, I have to change my browser settings too!

Time2time · 13 March 2012, 12:57 PM

Looks like it's a resounding, "Please put it back to the top!".

So please return it to the top.

general · 13 March 2012, 01:02 PM

I was wondering about the same thing.

Mosco · 13 March 2012, 01:08 PM

I hope this is the worst thing that happens to me this week

clay1680 · 13 March 2012, 02:25 PM

Oh, wait, I thought I was in the Vintage section...

13 March 2012, 10:05 AM	#35
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,588	Thanks for your honest support Carry on __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

13 March 2012, 10:56 AM	#38
salem65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Canada Watch: JS Watch co. 101 Posts: 1,395	This change has completely disrupted my life __________________ JS Watch 101 ▪ Grand Seiko SBGX061 ▪ Breitling A17364

13 March 2012, 01:08 PM	#45
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	I hope this is the worst thing that happens to me this week __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

13 March 2012, 02:25 PM	#46
clay1680 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Clay Location: Chicago Posts: 136	Oh, wait, I thought I was in the Vintage section... __________________ 1680 Submariner 5.0M 16013 Datejust 7.1M 16613 Submariner "Y" 16710 GMT "Z" '73 Speedy Pro

13 March 2012, 09:10 AM	#32
threemonkeys "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Craig Location: Seattle-ish, USA Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc Posts: 7,022	It's kind of thrown me off a bit. Maybe I need a life, though. Come to think of it, maybe we all need a life other than TRF. Hahaha - totally kidding folks. I'm addicted and I know it. I'll see you kids on TRF.

13 March 2012, 09:56 AM	#33
ng3l1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Australia Watch: Rolex 116610LV Posts: 51	Same here when i click everything look so different

13 March 2012, 09:59 AM	#34
JustABreathAway Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: United States Watch: The Reference Posts: 1,743	I must say that I respectfully disagree with this decision. First, the caveat that I appreciate all of the hard work of the moderators and administrators making this a wonderful site. I also do not quarrel lightly with such powerful individuals, I see no need to risk unnecessary loss of privilege. However, the bulk of traffic on this site certainly seems to be focused on the Rolex General Discussion board. I think, based on this, it rightly should be the first forum available on the selection page. It doesn't seem right to look for inadvertent visits to the Vintage section. There are several members who appreciate the older models, but Vintage should stand on it's own as a forum of interest. The order of forums ought to be reflective of interest on the site - Rolex General Discussion at the top. Thank you for consideration of my politely offered opinion and reasoning.

13 March 2012, 12:49 PM	#42
speedracer5.0 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Joel Location: Bel Air, MD Watch: 16623 16200 126610 Posts: 114	Yeah, I have to change my browser settings too!

13 March 2012, 12:57 PM	#43
Time2time Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: U.K Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C Posts: 2,178	Looks like it's a resounding, "Please put it back to the top!". So please return it to the top.

13 March 2012, 01:02 PM	#44
general "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Earth Posts: 723	I was wondering about the same thing.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)