93150 band question

[Elliot1957]

Was the 93150 bracelet ever made with a clasp that did not have a flip lock?
If yes, when and for what model..

[acce1999]

Originally Posted by Elliot1957

Was the 93150 bracelet ever made with a clasp that did not have a flip lock?
If yes, when and for what model..

Not that I know of, but it is not complicated to replace a clasp on a 93150 band with a - for example 78360 clasp; so you have a bracelet marked 93150 and a clasp marked 78360.

There are variations of the 93150 with different clasps, but they all have the flip-lock.

I know that the 93150 clasp was sold without divers extension as a replacement clasp for the 78360 bracelet earlier, and I've seen several such watches.

Best,

A

[Kingair]

Originally Posted by Elliot1957

Was the 93150 bracelet clasp ever made without the fliplock?
If yes, then when and for what models..

Not that I know . . . but I don't know everything . . . ;-)

As time keeps ticking the pro's will jump in !

HAGOne

[yessir69]

Originally Posted by Elliot1957

Was the 93150 bracelet clasp ever made without the fliplock?
If yes, then when and for what models..

I'm not aware of any. Rolex made the "Oysterlock" 78790 which was shorter and didn't have a divers extension. It was on GMTs and Explorers. But it still had the lock.

[azguy]

Originally Posted by Elliot1957

Was the 93150 bracelet ever made with a clasp that did not have a flip lock?
If yes, when and for what model..

No, I do not think so.......